Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Wolfram, D."
  1. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.04
    0.03771992 = product of:
      0.07543984 = sum of:
        0.07543984 = sum of:
          0.03844473 = weight(_text_:k in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03844473 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045509085 = queryNorm
              0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
          0.036995113 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036995113 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045509085 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
  2. Dimitroff, A.; Wolfram, D.: Searcher response in a hypertext-based bibliographic information retrieval system (1995) 0.01
    0.012331706 = product of:
      0.024663411 = sum of:
        0.024663411 = product of:
          0.049326822 = sum of:
            0.049326822 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049326822 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045509085 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.1, S.22-29
  3. Lu, K.; Cai, X.; Ajiferuke, I.; Wolfram, D.: Vocabulary size and its effect on topic representation (2017) 0.01
    0.009611183 = product of:
      0.019222366 = sum of:
        0.019222366 = product of:
          0.03844473 = sum of:
            0.03844473 = weight(_text_:k in 3414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03844473 = score(doc=3414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045509085 = queryNorm
                0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3414)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Xie, H.I.; Wolfram, D.: State digital library usability contributing organizational factors (2002) 0.01
    0.008009318 = product of:
      0.016018637 = sum of:
        0.016018637 = product of:
          0.032037273 = sum of:
            0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 5221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032037273 = score(doc=5221,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045509085 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 5221, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5221)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this issue Xie and Wolfram study the Wisconsin state digital library BadgerLink to determine the organizational factors that lead to different use requirements and the degree to which these are met, as well as impact on physical libraries. To this end, usage data from EBSCOhost and ProQuest logs for BadgerLink were analyzed, 313 Wisconsin libraries of all types were surveyed (76% response rate), and analyzed along with 81 responses to a voluntary web survey of end users. Heaviest users were K-12 schools and institutions of higher education. Heaviest use sites were the two largest state universities and the state's largest public library. Small libraries were infrequent users. Web survey respondents were mature working professionals. Sixty percent searched for specific information, but 46% reported browsing in subject areas. Libraries with dedicated Internet access reported more frequent usage than those with dial-up connection. Those who accessed from libraries reported more frequent use than those at work or at home. Libraries that trained end users reported more use, but the majority of the web survey respondents reported themselves as self-taught. Logs confirm reported subject interests. Three surrogates were requested for every full text document but full text availability is reported as the reason for use by 30% of users. Availability has led to the cancellation of subscriptions in many libraries that are important promoters of the service. A model will need to include interactions based upon the influence of each involved participant on the others. It will also need to include the extension of the activities of one participant to other participant organizations and the communication among these organizations.
  5. Zhang, J.; Wolfram, D.; Wang, P.; Hong, Y.; Gillis, R.: Visualization of health-subject analysis based on query term co-occurrences (2008) 0.01
    0.008009318 = product of:
      0.016018637 = sum of:
        0.016018637 = product of:
          0.032037273 = sum of:
            0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032037273 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045509085 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A multidimensional-scaling approach is used to analyze frequently used medical-topic terms in queries submitted to a Web-based consumer health information system. Based on a year-long transaction log file, five medical focus keywords (stomach, hip, stroke, depression, and cholesterol) and their co-occurring query terms are analyzed. An overlap-coefficient similarity measure and a conversion measure are used to calculate the proximity of terms to one another based on their co-occurrences in queries. The impact of the dimensionality of the visual configuration, the cutoff point of term co-occurrence for inclusion in the analysis, and the Minkowski metric power k on the stress value are discussed. A visual clustering of groups of terms based on the proximity within each focus-keyword group is also conducted. Term distributions within each visual configuration are characterized and are compared with formal medical vocabulary. This investigation reveals that there are significant differences between consumer health query-term usage and more formal medical terminology used by medical professionals when describing the same medical subject. Future directions are discussed.
  6. Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: Measuring author research relatedness : a comparison of word-based, topic-based, and author cocitation approaches (2012) 0.01
    0.008009318 = product of:
      0.016018637 = sum of:
        0.016018637 = product of:
          0.032037273 = sum of:
            0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032037273 = score(doc=453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045509085 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=453)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Castanha, R.C.G.; Wolfram, D.: ¬The domain of knowledge organization : a bibliometric analysis of prolific authors and their intellectual space (2018) 0.01
    0.007707316 = product of:
      0.015414632 = sum of:
        0.015414632 = product of:
          0.030829264 = sum of:
            0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030829264 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045509085 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22