-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007)
0.03
0.03143327 = product of:
0.06286654 = sum of:
0.06286654 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030829264 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.03
0.03143327 = product of:
0.06286654 = sum of:
0.06286654 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030829264 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.01
0.012331706 = product of:
0.024663411 = sum of:
0.024663411 = product of:
0.049326822 = sum of:
0.049326822 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049326822 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.01
0.010899791 = product of:
0.021799581 = sum of:
0.021799581 = product of:
0.043599162 = sum of:
0.043599162 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043599162 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books? (2016)
0.01
0.009611183 = product of:
0.019222366 = sum of:
0.019222366 = product of:
0.03844473 = sum of:
0.03844473 = weight(_text_:k in 2768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03844473 = score(doc=2768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2768)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Orduna-Malea, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Web citations in patents : evidence of technological impact? (2017)
0.01
0.009611183 = product of:
0.019222366 = sum of:
0.019222366 = product of:
0.03844473 = sum of:
0.03844473 = weight(_text_:k in 3764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03844473 = score(doc=3764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3764)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016)
0.01
0.009248778 = product of:
0.018497556 = sum of:
0.018497556 = product of:
0.036995113 = sum of:
0.036995113 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036995113 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 19. 3.2016 12:22:00
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.01
0.009248778 = product of:
0.018497556 = sum of:
0.018497556 = product of:
0.036995113 = sum of:
0.036995113 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036995113 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.01
0.009248778 = product of:
0.018497556 = sum of:
0.018497556 = product of:
0.036995113 = sum of:
0.036995113 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036995113 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations : a multi-discipline exploratory analysis (2007)
0.01
0.008009318 = product of:
0.016018637 = sum of:
0.016018637 = product of:
0.032037273 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? : an analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals (2008)
0.01
0.008009318 = product of:
0.016018637 = sum of:
0.016018637 = product of:
0.032037273 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 1614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=1614,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1614, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1614)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google book search : citation analysis for social science and the humanities (2009)
0.01
0.008009318 = product of:
0.016018637 = sum of:
0.016018637 = product of:
0.032037273 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Rezaie, S.: Assessing the citation impact of books : the role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus (2011)
0.01
0.008009318 = product of:
0.016018637 = sum of:
0.016018637 = product of:
0.032037273 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 4920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=4920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: ¬The role of online videos in research communication : a content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications (2012)
0.01
0.008009318 = product of:
0.016018637 = sum of:
0.016018637 = product of:
0.032037273 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=382,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: ¬An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books (2015)
0.01
0.008009318 = product of:
0.016018637 = sum of:
0.016018637 = product of:
0.032037273 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=1658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Mohammadi, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? : a survey of user motivations (2016)
0.01
0.008009318 = product of:
0.016018637 = sum of:
0.016018637 = product of:
0.032037273 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 2897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=2897,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2897, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2897)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Patent citation analysis with Google (2017)
0.01
0.008009318 = product of:
0.016018637 = sum of:
0.016018637 = product of:
0.032037273 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 3317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=3317,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3317, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3317)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ResearchGate articles : age, discipline, audience size, and impact (2017)
0.01
0.008009318 = product of:
0.016018637 = sum of:
0.016018637 = product of:
0.032037273 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 3349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=3349,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3349, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3349)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? (2017)
0.01
0.008009318 = product of:
0.016018637 = sum of:
0.016018637 = product of:
0.032037273 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: News stories as evidence for research? : BBC citations from articles, Books, and Wikipedia (2017)
0.01
0.008009318 = product of:
0.016018637 = sum of:
0.016018637 = product of:
0.032037273 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 3760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=3760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
