Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ford, N."
  1. Caregnato, S.; Ford, N.; Loughridge, B.: Expert systems support for subject librarians or subject specialists in academic libraries (1994) 0.02
    0.022094795 = product of:
      0.04418959 = sum of:
        0.04418959 = product of:
          0.08837918 = sum of:
            0.08837918 = weight(_text_:b in 7703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08837918 = score(doc=7703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 7703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7703)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Ford, N.: ¬The growth of understanding in information science : towards a developmental model (1999) 0.02
    0.015417679 = product of:
      0.030835358 = sum of:
        0.030835358 = product of:
          0.061670717 = sum of:
            0.061670717 = weight(_text_:22 in 4342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061670717 = score(doc=4342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4342)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2000 13:16:22
  3. Ford, N.: Introduction to information behaviour (2015) 0.02
    0.015417679 = product of:
      0.030835358 = sum of:
        0.030835358 = product of:
          0.061670717 = sum of:
            0.061670717 = weight(_text_:22 in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061670717 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:45:48
  4. Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Moss, N.: Web search strategies and human individual differences : cognitive and demographic factors, Internet attitudes, and approaches (2005) 0.01
    0.009469198 = product of:
      0.018938396 = sum of:
        0.018938396 = product of:
          0.037876792 = sum of:
            0.037876792 = weight(_text_:b in 3475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037876792 = score(doc=3475,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 3475, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3475)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The research reported here was an exploratory study that sought to discover the effects of human individual differences an Web search strategy. These differences consisted of (a) study approaches, (b) cognitive and demographic features, and (c) perceptions of and preferred approaches to Web-based information seeking. Sixtyeight master's students used AItaVista to search for information an three assigned search topics graded in terms of complexity. Five hundred seven search queries were factor analyzed to identify relationships between the individual difference variables and Boolean and best-match search strategies. A number of consistent patterns of relationship were found. As task complexity increased, a number of strategic shifts were also observed an the part of searchers possessing particular combinations of characteristics. A second article (published in this issue of JASIST; Ford, Miller, & Moss, 2005) presents a combined analyses of the data including a series of regression analyses.
  5. Whittle, M.; Eaglestone, B.; Ford, N.; Gillet, V.J.; Madden, A.: Data mining of search engine logs (2007) 0.01
    0.009469198 = product of:
      0.018938396 = sum of:
        0.018938396 = product of:
          0.037876792 = sum of:
            0.037876792 = weight(_text_:b in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037876792 = score(doc=1330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Sobczyk, G.; Duffin, R.: Information skills, searching behaviour and cognitive styles for student-centred learning : a computer-assisted learning approach (1996) 0.01
    0.009250606 = product of:
      0.018501213 = sum of:
        0.018501213 = product of:
          0.037002426 = sum of:
            0.037002426 = weight(_text_:22 in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037002426 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.2, S.79-92
  7. Ford, N.: Creativity and convergence in information science research : the roles of objectivity and subjectivity, constraint, and control (2004) 0.01
    0.007890998 = product of:
      0.015781997 = sum of:
        0.015781997 = product of:
          0.031563994 = sum of:
            0.031563994 = weight(_text_:b in 5250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031563994 = score(doc=5250,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 5250, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5250)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Objectivity, in the form of the application of external scrutiny according to standards agreed within a research community, is an essential characteristic of information science research whether pursued from positivist, interpretative, or action research perspectives. Subjectivity may represent both a legitimate focus of research (e.g., people's perceptions and attitudes) and a legitimate component of methodology (e.g., enabling researchers to enter, experience, and share the perceived worlds of their subjects). However, subjectivity that both (a) is not open to external scrutiny and (b) gives rise to contingent dependencies is problematic for research. The issue of problematic types of subjectivity is considered, and the contributions to the debate concerning possible solutions of two key thinkers - the cybernetician Gordon Pask and the methodological philosopher Brenda Dervin - are discussed. The need identified by Dervin for researchers to be able to escape (expose and test) their own assumptions is explored in terms of a dynamic interplay between relatively subjective and objective forces, each requiring the liberating and constraining energies of the other. The extent to which meta-methodological awareness - a prerequisite for any such escape - can be fostered, for example, by the quality of research environments, is explored along with implications for those responsible for managing and funding research.
  8. Gorrell, G.; Eaglestone, B.; Ford, N.; Holdridge, P.; Madden, A.: Towards "metacognitively aware" IR systems : an initial user study (2009) 0.01
    0.007890998 = product of:
      0.015781997 = sum of:
        0.015781997 = product of:
          0.031563994 = sum of:
            0.031563994 = weight(_text_:b in 2842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031563994 = score(doc=2842,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 2842, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2842)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Ford, N.; Eaglestone, B.; Madden, A.; Whittle, M.: Web searching by the "general public" : an individual differences perspective (2009) 0.01
    0.007890998 = product of:
      0.015781997 = sum of:
        0.015781997 = product of:
          0.031563994 = sum of:
            0.031563994 = weight(_text_:b in 3607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031563994 = score(doc=3607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 3607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Birdi, B.; Ford, N.: Towards a new sociological model of fiction reading (2018) 0.01
    0.007890998 = product of:
      0.015781997 = sum of:
        0.015781997 = product of:
          0.031563994 = sum of:
            0.031563994 = weight(_text_:b in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031563994 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Eaglestone, B.; Ford, N.; Brown, G.J.; Moore, A.: Information systems and creativity : an empirical study (2007) 0.01
    0.0063127987 = product of:
      0.012625597 = sum of:
        0.012625597 = product of:
          0.025251195 = sum of:
            0.025251195 = weight(_text_:b in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025251195 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)