-
Sedelow, S.Y.; Sedelow, W.A.: Thesauri and concept-lattice semantic nets (1994)
0.03
0.0346844 = product of:
0.1040532 = sum of:
0.0704479 = weight(_text_:et in 7733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0704479 = score(doc=7733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 7733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7733)
0.033605296 = product of:
0.06721059 = sum of:
0.06721059 = weight(_text_:al in 7733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06721059 = score(doc=7733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 7733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7733)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
-
Kent, R.E.: Implications and rules in thesauri (1994)
0.03
0.0346844 = product of:
0.1040532 = sum of:
0.0704479 = weight(_text_:et in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0704479 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
0.033605296 = product of:
0.06721059 = sum of:
0.06721059 = weight(_text_:al in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06721059 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
-
Priss, U.: Comparing classification systems using facets (2000)
0.03
0.0346844 = product of:
0.1040532 = sum of:
0.0704479 = weight(_text_:et in 6485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0704479 = score(doc=6485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 6485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6485)
0.033605296 = product of:
0.06721059 = sum of:
0.06721059 = weight(_text_:al in 6485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06721059 = score(doc=6485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 6485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
-
Priss, U.: ¬A graphical interface for conceptually navigating faceted thesauri (1998)
0.03
0.030348849 = product of:
0.09104654 = sum of:
0.06164191 = weight(_text_:et in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06164191 = score(doc=6658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
0.029404636 = product of:
0.058809273 = sum of:
0.058809273 = weight(_text_:al in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058809273 = score(doc=6658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
-
Wille, R.: Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung in der Wirtschaft (2002)
0.03
0.030348849 = product of:
0.09104654 = sum of:
0.06164191 = weight(_text_:et in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06164191 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
0.029404636 = product of:
0.058809273 = sum of:
0.058809273 = weight(_text_:al in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058809273 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung ist einem pragmatischen Wissensverständnis verpflichtet, nach dem menschliches Wissen in einem offenen Prozess menschlichen Denkens, Argumentierens und Kommunizierens entsteht und weiterlebt. Sie gründet sich auf eine mathematische Begriffstheorie, die auf das wechselseitige Zusammenwirken von Formalem und Inhaltlichem ausgerichtet ist. Wie diese theoretische Konzeption in der wirtschaftlichen Praxis zur Wirkung kommt wird erläutert anhand der Kernprozesse des organisationalen Wissensmanagements, d.h. nach G. Probst et al. anhand von Wissensidentifikation, Wissenserwerb, Wissensentwicklung, Wissens(ver)teilung, Wissensnutzung und Wissensbewahrung; jeweils an einem Beispiel wird der Einsatz spezifischer Methoden der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung demonstriert. Abschließend wird auf den prozesshaften Wirkungszusammenhang von Wissenszielen und Wissensbewertungen mit den Kernprozessen aus Sicht der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung eingegangen.
-
Wille, R.: Geometric representations of concept lattices (1989)
0.03
0.02685146 = product of:
0.16110876 = sum of:
0.16110876 = weight(_text_:o in 3042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16110876 = score(doc=3042,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1816457 = queryWeight, product of:
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.8869396 = fieldWeight in 3042, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3042)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Conceptual and numerical analysis of data. Ed.: O. Opitz
-
Eklund, P.; Groh, B.; Stumme, G.; Wille, R.: ¬A conceptual-logic extension of TOSCANA (2000)
0.03
0.0260133 = product of:
0.0780399 = sum of:
0.052835923 = weight(_text_:et in 5082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052835923 = score(doc=5082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 5082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5082)
0.025203973 = product of:
0.050407946 = sum of:
0.050407946 = weight(_text_:al in 5082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050407946 = score(doc=5082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 5082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5082)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
-
Eklund. P.W.: Logic-based networks : concept graphs and conceptual structures (2000)
0.03
0.0260133 = product of:
0.0780399 = sum of:
0.052835923 = weight(_text_:et in 5084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052835923 = score(doc=5084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 5084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5084)
0.025203973 = product of:
0.050407946 = sum of:
0.050407946 = weight(_text_:al in 5084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050407946 = score(doc=5084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 5084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5084)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
-
Burmeister, P.; Holzer, R.: On the treatment of incomplete knowledge in formal concept analysis (2000)
0.03
0.0260133 = product of:
0.0780399 = sum of:
0.052835923 = weight(_text_:et in 5085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052835923 = score(doc=5085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 5085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5085)
0.025203973 = product of:
0.050407946 = sum of:
0.050407946 = weight(_text_:al in 5085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050407946 = score(doc=5085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 5085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5085)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
-
Ganter, B.: Computing with conceptual structures (2000)
0.03
0.0260133 = product of:
0.0780399 = sum of:
0.052835923 = weight(_text_:et in 5088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052835923 = score(doc=5088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 5088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5088)
0.025203973 = product of:
0.050407946 = sum of:
0.050407946 = weight(_text_:al in 5088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050407946 = score(doc=5088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 5088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
-
Hereth, J.; Stumme, G.; Wille, R.; Wille, U.: Conceptual knowledge discovery and data analysis (2000)
0.02
0.021677751 = product of:
0.06503325 = sum of:
0.044029936 = weight(_text_:et in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044029936 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.021003311 = product of:
0.042006623 = sum of:
0.042006623 = weight(_text_:al in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042006623 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
-
Scheich, P.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Conceptual data systems (1993)
0.02
0.020138597 = product of:
0.12083158 = sum of:
0.12083158 = weight(_text_:o in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12083158 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1816457 = queryWeight, product of:
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.6652047 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Information and classification: concepts, methods and applications. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, University of Dortmund, April 1-3, 1992. Ed.: O. Opitz u.a
-
Priss, U.; Jacob, E.: Utilizing faceted structures for information systems design (1999)
0.02
0.0173422 = product of:
0.0520266 = sum of:
0.03522395 = weight(_text_:et in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03522395 = score(doc=2470,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
0.016802648 = product of:
0.033605296 = sum of:
0.033605296 = weight(_text_:al in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033605296 = score(doc=2470,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The writers show that a faceted navigation structure makes web sites easier to use. They begin by analyzing the web sites of three library and information science faculties, and seeing if the sites easily provide the answers to five specific questions, e.g., how the school ranks in national evaluations. (It is worth noting that the web site of the Faculty of Information Studies and the University of Toronto, where this bibliography is being written, would fail on four of the five questions.) Using examples from LIS web site content, they show how facets can be related and constructed, and use concept diagrams for illustration. They briefly discuss constraints necessary when joining facets: for example, enrolled students can be full- or part-time, but prospective and alumni students cannot. It should not be possible to construct terms such as "part-time alumni" (see Yannis Tzitzikas et al, below in Background). They conclude that a faceted approach is best for web site navigation, because it can clearly show where the user is in the site, what the related pages are, and how to get to them. There is a short discussion of user interfaces, and the diagrams in the paper will be of interest to anyone making a facet-based web site. This paper is clearly written, informative, and thought-provoking. Uta Priss's web site lists her other publications, many of which are related and some of which are online: http://www.upriss.org.uk/top/research.html.
-
Kipke, U.; Wille, R.: Begriffsverbände als Ablaufschemata zur Gegenstandsbestimmung (1986)
0.01
0.01342573 = product of:
0.08055438 = sum of:
0.08055438 = weight(_text_:o in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08055438 = score(doc=3039,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1816457 = queryWeight, product of:
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.4434698 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld. Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P. Degens, H.-J. Hermes, O. Opitz
-
Prediger, S.: Kontextuelle Urteilslogik mit Begriffsgraphen : Ein Beitrag zur Restrukturierung der mathematischen Logik (1998)
0.00
0.0040876144 = product of:
0.024525685 = sum of:
0.024525685 = product of:
0.04905137 = sum of:
0.04905137 = weight(_text_:22 in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04905137 = score(doc=3142,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 26. 2.2008 15:58:22
-
Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995)
0.00
0.0032700915 = product of:
0.019620549 = sum of:
0.019620549 = product of:
0.039241098 = sum of:
0.039241098 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039241098 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81
-
Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000)
0.00
0.00286133 = product of:
0.01716798 = sum of:
0.01716798 = product of:
0.03433596 = sum of:
0.03433596 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03433596 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:47:06
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.00
0.00286133 = product of:
0.01716798 = sum of:
0.01716798 = product of:
0.03433596 = sum of:
0.03433596 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03433596 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Conceptual structures : logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000 (2000)
0.00
0.0021003312 = product of:
0.0126019865 = sum of:
0.0126019865 = product of:
0.025203973 = sum of:
0.025203973 = weight(_text_:al in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025203973 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03620396 = queryNorm
0.15190414 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Computer scientists create models of a perceived reality. Through AI techniques, these models aim at providing the basic support for emulating cognitive behavior such as reasoning and learning, which is one of the main goals of the Al research effort. Such computer models are formed through the interaction of various acquisition and inference mechanisms: perception, concept learning, conceptual clustering, hypothesis testing, probabilistic inference, etc., and are represented using different paradigms tightly linked to the processes that use them. Among these paradigms let us cite: biological models (neural nets, genetic programming), logic-based models (first-order logic, modal logic, rule-based systems), virtual reality models (object systems, agent systems), probabilistic models (Bayesian nets, fuzzy logic), linguistic models (conceptual dependency graphs, language-based rep resentations), etc. One of the strengths of the Conceptual Graph (CG) theory is its versatility in terms of the representation paradigms under which it falls. It can be viewed and therefore used, under different representation paradigms, which makes it a popular choice for a wealth of applications. Its full coupling with different cognitive processes lead to the opening of the field toward related research communities such as the Description Logic, Formal Concept Analysis, and Computational Linguistic communities. We now see more and more research results from one community enrich the other, laying the foundations of common philosophical grounds from which a successful synergy can emerge. ICCS 2000 embodies this spirit of research collaboration. It presents a set of papers that we believe, by their exposure, will benefit the whole community. For instance, the technical program proposes tracks on Conceptual Ontologies, Language, Formal Concept Analysis, Computational Aspects of Conceptual Structures, and Formal Semantics, with some papers on pragmatism and human related aspects of computing. Never before was the program of ICCS formed by so heterogeneously rooted theories of knowledge representation and use. We hope that this swirl of ideas will benefit you as much as it already has benefited us while putting together this program
