-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.04
0.04028661 = product of:
0.08057322 = sum of:
0.08057322 = sum of:
0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018323096 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.062250126 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062250126 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001)
0.02
0.018675037 = product of:
0.037350073 = sum of:
0.037350073 = product of:
0.07470015 = sum of:
0.07470015 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07470015 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24. 8.2005 19:20:22
-
Ermert, A.; Stein, R.: ¬Das Portal museumsvokabular.de für kontrolliertes Vokabular (2006)
0.01
0.0054969285 = product of:
0.010993857 = sum of:
0.010993857 = product of:
0.021987714 = sum of:
0.021987714 = weight(_text_:d in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021987714 = score(doc=2831,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
-
Landwehr, L.: Überlegungen und Erfahrungen zum Thema Langzeitarchivierung beim Verbundprojekt digiCULT-MuseenSH (2006)
0.00
0.004580774 = product of:
0.009161548 = sum of:
0.009161548 = product of:
0.018323096 = sum of:
0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018323096 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
-
Stein, R.; Saro, C.: Online-Plattform für kontrolliertes Vokabular (2006)
0.00
0.004580774 = product of:
0.009161548 = sum of:
0.009161548 = product of:
0.018323096 = sum of:
0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 3443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018323096 = score(doc=3443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 3443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
-
Michel, D.: Taxonomy of Subject Relationships (1997)
0.00
0.004580774 = product of:
0.009161548 = sum of:
0.009161548 = product of:
0.018323096 = sum of:
0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018323096 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kless, D.: From a thesaurus standard to a general knowledge organization standard?! (2007)
0.00
0.004580774 = product of:
0.009161548 = sum of:
0.009161548 = product of:
0.018323096 = sum of:
0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018323096 = score(doc=528,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 528, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=528)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Busch, D.: Organisation eines Thesaurus für die Unterstützung der mehrsprachigen Suche in einer bibliographischen Datenbank im Bereich Planen und Bauen (2016)
0.00
0.0032390966 = product of:
0.006478193 = sum of:
0.006478193 = product of:
0.012956386 = sum of:
0.012956386 = weight(_text_:d in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012956386 = score(doc=3308,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
-
Assem, M. van; Menken, M.R.; Schreiber, G.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: ¬A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL (2004)
0.00
0.0032065418 = product of:
0.0064130835 = sum of:
0.0064130835 = product of:
0.012826167 = sum of:
0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012826167 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC'04). Eds. D. Plexousakis and F. van Harmelen
-
Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M.: Analysis of the long term dynamics in thesaurus developments and its consequences (2017)
0.00
0.0025912772 = product of:
0.0051825545 = sum of:
0.0051825545 = product of:
0.010365109 = sum of:
0.010365109 = weight(_text_:d in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010365109 = score(doc=3081,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.118742 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die Arbeit analysiert die dynamische Entwicklung und den Gebrauch von Thesaurusbegriffen. Zusätzlich konzentriert sie sich auf die Faktoren, die die Zahl von Indexbegriffen pro Dokument oder Zeitschrift beeinflussen. Als Untersuchungsobjekt dienten der MeSH und die entsprechende Datenbank "MEDLINE". Die wichtigsten Konsequenzen sind: 1. Der MeSH-Thesaurus hat sich durch drei unterschiedliche Phasen jeweils logarithmisch entwickelt. Solch einen Thesaurus sollte folgenden Gleichung folgen: "T = 3.076,6 Ln (d) - 22.695 + 0,0039d" (T = Begriffe, Ln = natürlicher Logarithmus und d = Dokumente). Um solch einen Thesaurus zu konstruieren, muss man demnach etwa 1.600 Dokumente von unterschiedlichen Themen des Bereiches des Thesaurus haben. Die dynamische Entwicklung von Thesauri wie MeSH erfordert die Einführung eines neuen Begriffs pro Indexierung von 256 neuen Dokumenten. 2. Die Verteilung der Thesaurusbegriffe erbrachte drei Kategorien: starke, normale und selten verwendete Headings. Die letzte Gruppe ist in einer Testphase, während in der ersten und zweiten Kategorie die neu hinzukommenden Deskriptoren zu einem Thesauruswachstum führen. 3. Es gibt ein logarithmisches Verhältnis zwischen der Zahl von Index-Begriffen pro Aufsatz und dessen Seitenzahl für die Artikeln zwischen einer und einundzwanzig Seiten. 4. Zeitschriftenaufsätze, die in MEDLINE mit Abstracts erscheinen erhalten fast zwei Deskriptoren mehr. 5. Die Findablity der nicht-englisch sprachigen Dokumente in MEDLINE ist geringer als die englische Dokumente. 6. Aufsätze der Zeitschriften mit einem Impact Factor 0 bis fünfzehn erhalten nicht mehr Indexbegriffe als die der anderen von MEDINE erfassten Zeitschriften. 7. In einem Indexierungssystem haben unterschiedliche Zeitschriften mehr oder weniger Gewicht in ihrem Findability. Die Verteilung der Indexbegriffe pro Seite hat gezeigt, dass es bei MEDLINE drei Kategorien der Publikationen gibt. Außerdem gibt es wenige stark bevorzugten Zeitschriften."
-
Tudhope, D.; Alani, H.; Jones, C.: Augmenting thesaurus relationships : possibilities for retrieval (2001)
0.00
0.002290387 = product of:
0.004580774 = sum of:
0.004580774 = product of:
0.009161548 = sum of:
0.009161548 = weight(_text_:d in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009161548 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hill, L.: New Protocols for Gazetteer and Thesaurus Services (2002)
0.00
0.0018323096 = product of:
0.0036646193 = sum of:
0.0036646193 = product of:
0.0073292386 = sum of:
0.0073292386 = weight(_text_:d in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073292386 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 8(2002) no.3, x S
-
ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997)
0.00
0.0016032709 = product of:
0.0032065418 = sum of:
0.0032065418 = product of:
0.0064130835 = sum of:
0.0064130835 = weight(_text_:d in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0064130835 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.07346786 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
