-
Egghe, L.: Influence of adding or deleting items and sources on the h-index (2010)
0.02
0.01742711 = product of:
0.052281328 = sum of:
0.052281328 = product of:
0.104562655 = sum of:
0.104562655 = weight(_text_:m.a in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.104562655 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25558433 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.04141409 = queryNorm
0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Adding or deleting items such as self-citations has an influence on the h-index of an author. This influence will be proved mathematically in this article. We hereby prove the experimental finding in E. Gianoli and M.A. Molina-Montenegro ([2009]) that the influence of adding or deleting self-citations on the h-index is greater for low values of the h-index. Why this is logical also is shown by a simple theoretical example. Adding or deleting sources such as adding or deleting minor contributions of an author also has an influence on the h-index of this author; this influence is modeled in this article. This model explains some practical examples found in X. Hu, R. Rousseau, and J. Chen (in press).
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.01
0.00935173 = product of:
0.02805519 = sum of:
0.02805519 = product of:
0.05611038 = sum of:
0.05611038 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05611038 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14502509 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04141409 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.01
0.0056110374 = product of:
0.016833112 = sum of:
0.016833112 = product of:
0.033666223 = sum of:
0.033666223 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033666223 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14502509 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04141409 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Egghe, L.: ¬A universal method of information retrieval evaluation : the "missing" link M and the universal IR surface (2004)
0.01
0.0056110374 = product of:
0.016833112 = sum of:
0.016833112 = product of:
0.033666223 = sum of:
0.033666223 = weight(_text_:22 in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033666223 = score(doc=2558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14502509 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04141409 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 14. 8.2004 19:17:22