Milard, B.: ¬The social circles behind scientific references : relationships between citing and cited authors in chemistry publications (2014)
0.02
0.016717812 = product of:
0.033435624 = sum of:
0.033435624 = product of:
0.06687125 = sum of:
0.06687125 = weight(_text_:i in 1539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06687125 = score(doc=1539,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.43306938 = fieldWeight in 1539, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper provides a better understanding of the implications of researchers' social networks in bibliographic references. Using a set of chemistry papers and conducting interviews with their authors (n = 32), I characterize the type of relation the author has with the authors of the references contained in his/her paper (n = 3,623). I show that citation relationships do not always involve underlying personal exchanges and that unknown references are an essential component, revealing segmentations in scientific groups. The relationships implied by references are of various strengths and origins. Several inclusive social circles are then identified: co-authors, close acquaintances, colleagues, invisible colleges, peers, contactables, and strangers. I conclude that publication is a device that contributes to a relatively stable distribution among the various social circles that structure scientific sociability.
