Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  1. Tsujii, J.-I.: Automatic acquisition of semantic collocation from corpora (1995) 0.05
    0.047925644 = product of:
      0.09585129 = sum of:
        0.09585129 = sum of:
          0.051477507 = weight(_text_:i in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051477507 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04093939 = queryNorm
              0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
          0.04437378 = weight(_text_:22 in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04437378 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04093939 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  2. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.02
    0.02218689 = product of:
      0.04437378 = sum of:
        0.04437378 = product of:
          0.08874756 = sum of:
            0.08874756 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08874756 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  3. Hlava, M.M.K.: Automatic indexing : comparing rule-based and statistics-based indexing systems (2005) 0.02
    0.019413529 = product of:
      0.038827058 = sum of:
        0.038827058 = product of:
          0.077654116 = sum of:
            0.077654116 = weight(_text_:22 in 6265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077654116 = score(doc=6265,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6265, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6265)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information outlook. 9(2005) no.8, S.22-23
  4. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: ¬The nature of indexing: how humans and machines analyze messages and texts for retrieval : Part I: Research and the nature of human indexing (2001) 0.02
    0.019304065 = product of:
      0.03860813 = sum of:
        0.03860813 = product of:
          0.07721626 = sum of:
            0.07721626 = weight(_text_:i in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07721626 = score(doc=3136,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Pulgarin, A.; Gil-Leiva, I.: Bibliometric analysis of the automatic indexing literature : 1956-2000 (2004) 0.02
    0.01592504 = product of:
      0.03185008 = sum of:
        0.03185008 = product of:
          0.06370016 = sum of:
            0.06370016 = weight(_text_:i in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06370016 = score(doc=2566,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.41253293 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2566)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We present a bibliometric study of a corpus of 839 bibliographic references about automatic indexing, covering the period 1956-2000. We analyse the distribution of authors and works, the obsolescence and its dispersion, and the distribution of the literature by topic, year, and source type. We conclude that: (i) there has been a constant interest on the part of researchers; (ii) the most studied topics were the techniques and methods employed and the general aspects of automatic indexing; (iii) the productivity of the authors does fit a Lotka distribution (Dmax=0.02 and critical value=0.054); (iv) the annual aging factor is 95%; and (v) the dispersion of the literature is low.
  6. Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988) 0.01
    0.013866806 = product of:
      0.027733613 = sum of:
        0.027733613 = product of:
          0.055467226 = sum of:
            0.055467226 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055467226 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 8.1998 12:51:22
  7. Kutschekmanesch, S.; Lutes, B.; Moelle, K.; Thiel, U.; Tzeras, K.: Automated multilingual indexing : a synthesis of rule-based and thesaurus-based methods (1998) 0.01
    0.013866806 = product of:
      0.027733613 = sum of:
        0.027733613 = product of:
          0.055467226 = sum of:
            0.055467226 = weight(_text_:22 in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055467226 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  8. Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016) 0.01
    0.013866806 = product of:
      0.027733613 = sum of:
        0.027733613 = product of:
          0.055467226 = sum of:
            0.055467226 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055467226 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  9. Salton, G.: Fast document classification in automatic information retrieval (1978) 0.01
    0.012869377 = product of:
      0.025738753 = sum of:
        0.025738753 = product of:
          0.051477507 = sum of:
            0.051477507 = weight(_text_:i in 2331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051477507 = score(doc=2331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 2331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Kooperation in der Klassifikation I. Proc. der Sekt.1-3 der 2. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Frankfurt-Hoechst, 6.-7.4.1978. Bearb.: W. Dahlberg
  10. Hlava, M.M.K.: Machine-Aided Indexing (MAI) in a multilingual environemt (1992) 0.01
    0.012869377 = product of:
      0.025738753 = sum of:
        0.025738753 = product of:
          0.051477507 = sum of:
            0.051477507 = weight(_text_:i in 2378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051477507 = score(doc=2378,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 2378, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2378)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online information 92. Proc. of the 16th Int. Online Information Meeting, London, 8-10.12.1992. Ed. by David I. Raitt
  11. Souza, R.R.; Gil-Leiva, I.: Automatic indexing of scientific texts : a methodological comparison (2016) 0.01
    0.012869377 = product of:
      0.025738753 = sum of:
        0.025738753 = product of:
          0.051477507 = sum of:
            0.051477507 = weight(_text_:i in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051477507 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Gomez, I.: Coping with the problem of subject classification diversity (1996) 0.01
    0.011260705 = product of:
      0.02252141 = sum of:
        0.02252141 = product of:
          0.04504282 = sum of:
            0.04504282 = weight(_text_:i in 5074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04504282 = score(doc=5074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 5074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5074)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Gábor, K.; Zargayouna, H.; Tellier, I.; Buscaldi, D.; Charnois, T.: ¬A typology of semantic relations dedicated to scientific literature analysis (2016) 0.01
    0.011260705 = product of:
      0.02252141 = sum of:
        0.02252141 = product of:
          0.04504282 = sum of:
            0.04504282 = weight(_text_:i in 2933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04504282 = score(doc=2933,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 2933, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2933)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Riloff, E.: ¬An empirical study of automated dictionary construction for information extraction in three domains (1996) 0.01
    0.011093445 = product of:
      0.02218689 = sum of:
        0.02218689 = product of:
          0.04437378 = sum of:
            0.04437378 = weight(_text_:22 in 6752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04437378 = score(doc=6752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  15. Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983) 0.01
    0.0097067645 = product of:
      0.019413529 = sum of:
        0.019413529 = product of:
          0.038827058 = sum of:
            0.038827058 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038827058 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 3.1996 13:22:21
  16. Bordoni, L.; Pazienza, M.T.: Documents automatic indexing in an environmental domain (1997) 0.01
    0.0097067645 = product of:
      0.019413529 = sum of:
        0.019413529 = product of:
          0.038827058 = sum of:
            0.038827058 = weight(_text_:22 in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038827058 = score(doc=530,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.1, S.17-28
  17. Wolfekuhler, M.R.; Punch, W.F.: Finding salient features for personal Web pages categories (1997) 0.01
    0.0097067645 = product of:
      0.019413529 = sum of:
        0.019413529 = product of:
          0.038827058 = sum of:
            0.038827058 = weight(_text_:22 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038827058 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  18. Newman, D.J.; Block, S.: Probabilistic topic decomposition of an eighteenth-century American newspaper (2006) 0.01
    0.0097067645 = product of:
      0.019413529 = sum of:
        0.019413529 = product of:
          0.038827058 = sum of:
            0.038827058 = weight(_text_:22 in 5291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038827058 = score(doc=5291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:32:00
  19. Hmeidi, I.; Kanaan, G.; Evens, M.: Design and implementation of automatic indexing for information retrieval with Arabic documents (1997) 0.01
    0.0096520325 = product of:
      0.019304065 = sum of:
        0.019304065 = product of:
          0.03860813 = sum of:
            0.03860813 = weight(_text_:i in 1660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03860813 = score(doc=1660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Flores, F.N.; Moreira, V.P.: Assessing the impact of stemming accuracy on information retrieval : a multilingual perspective (2016) 0.01
    0.0096520325 = product of:
      0.019304065 = sum of:
        0.019304065 = product of:
          0.03860813 = sum of:
            0.03860813 = weight(_text_:i in 3187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03860813 = score(doc=3187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 3187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The quality of stemming algorithms is typically measured in two different ways: (i) how accurately they map the variant forms of a word to the same stem; or (ii) how much improvement they bring to Information Retrieval systems. In this article, we evaluate various stemming algorithms, in four languages, in terms of accuracy and in terms of their aid to Information Retrieval. The aim is to assess whether the most accurate stemmers are also the ones that bring the biggest gain in Information Retrieval. Experiments in English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish show that this is not always the case, as stemmers with higher error rates yield better retrieval quality. As a byproduct, we also identified the most accurate stemmers and the best for Information Retrieval purposes.