Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Bertram, J.: Informationen verzweifelt gesucht : Enterprise Search in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2011) 0.04
    0.035697345 = product of:
      0.07139469 = sum of:
        0.07139469 = sum of:
          0.03217344 = weight(_text_:i in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03217344 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04093939 = queryNorm
              0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.03922125 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03922125 = score(doc=2657,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04093939 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit geht dem Status quo der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen nach und beleuchtet Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Aus der Analyse des Ist-Zustands wird der Bedarf an Enterprise-Search-Software abgeleitet und es werden Rahmenbedingungen für deren erfolgreiche Einführung skizziert. Die Untersuchung stützt sich auf eine im Jahr 2009 durchgeführte Onlinebefragung von 469 österreichischen Großunternehmen (Rücklauf 22 %) und daran anschließende Leitfadeninterviews mit zwölf Teilnehmern der Onlinebefragung. Der theoretische Teil verortet die Arbeit im Kontext des Informations- und Wissensmanagements. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Ansatz der Enterprise Search, ihrer Abgrenzung gegenüber der Suche im Internet und ihrem Leistungsspektrum. Im empirischen Teil wird zunächst aufgezeigt, wie die Unternehmen ihre Informationen organisieren und welche Probleme dabei auftreten. Es folgt eine Analyse des Status quo der Informati-onssuche im Unternehmen. Abschließend werden Bekanntheit und Einsatz von Enterprise-Search-Software in der Zielgruppe untersucht sowie für die Einführung dieser Software nötige Rahmenbedingungen benannt. Defizite machen die Befragten insbesondere im Hinblick auf die übergreifende Suche im Unternehmen und die Suche nach Kompetenzträgern aus. Hier werden Lücken im Wissensmanagement offenbar. 29 % der Respondenten der Onlinebefragung geben zu-dem an, dass es in ihren Unternehmen gelegentlich bis häufig zu Fehlentscheidungen infolge defizitärer Informationslagen kommt. Enterprise-Search-Software kommt in 17 % der Unternehmen, die sich an der Onlinebefragung beteiligten, zum Einsatz. Die durch Enterprise-Search-Software bewirkten Veränderungen werden grundsätzlich posi-tiv beurteilt. Alles in allem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass Enterprise-Search-Strategien nur Erfolg haben können, wenn man sie in umfassende Maßnahmen des Informations- und Wissensmanagements einbettet.
    Content
    Dissertation am Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft der Philosophische Fakultät I an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Vgl.: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/dissertationen/bertram-jutta-2011-06-30/PDF/bertram.pdf.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 20:40:31
  2. Cole, C.; Behesthi, J.; Large, A.; Lamoureux, I.; Abuhimed, D.; AlGhamdi, M.: Seeking information for a middle school history project : the concept of implicit knowledge in the students' transition from Kuhlthau's Stage 3 to Stage 4 (2013) 0.03
    0.029953526 = product of:
      0.059907053 = sum of:
        0.059907053 = sum of:
          0.03217344 = weight(_text_:i in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03217344 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04093939 = queryNorm
              0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
          0.027733613 = weight(_text_:22 in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027733613 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04093939 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:41:17
  3. Ford, N.: Introduction to information behaviour (2015) 0.01
    0.013866806 = product of:
      0.027733613 = sum of:
        0.027733613 = product of:
          0.055467226 = sum of:
            0.055467226 = weight(_text_:22 in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055467226 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:45:48
  4. Bertram, J.: Stand der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2013) 0.01
    0.011766376 = product of:
      0.023532752 = sum of:
        0.023532752 = product of:
          0.047065504 = sum of:
            0.047065504 = weight(_text_:22 in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047065504 = score(doc=2658,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Dass eine erfolgreiche Suche nach im Unternehmen vorhandenen Informationen oftmals schwieriger zu bewerkstelligen ist als eine Suche im Internet, wird in der Privatwirtschaft zunehmend als Problem gesehen. Enterprise Search ist eine Strategie, diesem Problem zu begegnen. In einer Studie mit explorativem Charakter wurde der Frage nachgegangen, wie es um den Stand unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Unternehmen bestellt ist. m Rahmen einer Onlinebefragung wurden dazu im März / April 2009 469 Unternehmen befragt. Es beteiligten sich 104 Unternehmen. Das entspricht einem Rücklauf von 22 %. Dieser Beitrag gibt Auskunft über Status quo der unternehmensweiten Informationsorganisation und -suche in Österreich und benennt unternehmens- bzw. personengebundene Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Im einzelnen werden Ergebnisse zu folgenden Aspekten präsentiert: Regelung der Informationsorganisation; Anreicherung unstrukturierter Informationen mit Metadaten; Probleme bei der Suche nach unternehmensinternen Informationen; täglicher Zeitaufwand für die Suche; vorhandene, wünschenswerte und benötigte Suchfunktionalitäten; Zufriedenheit mit der Suche und der Informationsorganisation Unternehmen.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 19:00:02
  5. Zemel, A.: Texts as actions : requests in online chats between reference librarians and library patrons (2017) 0.01
    0.01137503 = product of:
      0.02275006 = sum of:
        0.02275006 = product of:
          0.04550012 = sum of:
            0.04550012 = weight(_text_:i in 3684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04550012 = score(doc=3684,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 3684, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Virtual reference services provide opportunities for library patrons to produce requests of reference librarians through quasi-synchronous computer-mediated exchanges in which requests and deliverables are produced as online textual objects. Text postings only become the actions they perform, such as an information request or deliverable, through the recipient's work of reading. Text postings thus are designed for their recipients and are built in ways that instruct particular readings. In this paper, I show that patron requests are interactional achievements co-constituted by librarians and patrons through the exchange of text postings that are designed to be seen as requests. The Reference and User Services Association offers guidelines for online interactions between librarians and patrons. However, such guidelines provide only general recommendations by which librarians may overcome difficulties in identifying the specific information needs of patrons. I examine actual chat logs of virtual reference interactions and describe how librarians engage with patrons to co-construct actionable requests to specify and fulfill patron information needs. Conversation analytic methods are used to identify the way texts are produced to instruct recipients in the ways they are to be read and how these texts serve, through reading's work, as an analysis of the actions prior texts perform.
  6. Meyer-Doerpinghaus, U.; Tappenbeck, I.: Informationskompetenz neu erfinden : Praxis, Perspektiven, Potenziale (2015) 0.01
    0.011260705 = product of:
      0.02252141 = sum of:
        0.02252141 = product of:
          0.04504282 = sum of:
            0.04504282 = weight(_text_:i in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04504282 = score(doc=2478,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Tappenbeck, I.; Wittich, A.; Gäde, M.: Fit für die Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz? : Anforderungen an die Qualifikation von Teaching Librarians in bibliothekarischen Studiengängen und Ausbildungseinrichtungen (2017) 0.01
    0.011260705 = product of:
      0.02252141 = sum of:
        0.02252141 = product of:
          0.04504282 = sum of:
            0.04504282 = weight(_text_:i in 3729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04504282 = score(doc=3729,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 3729, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3729)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Agarwal, N.K.: Exploring context in information behavior : seeker, situation, surroundings, and shared identities (2018) 0.01
    0.011145207 = product of:
      0.022290414 = sum of:
        0.022290414 = product of:
          0.04458083 = sum of:
            0.04458083 = weight(_text_:i in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04458083 = score(doc=4992,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.28871292 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The field of human information behavior runs the gamut of processes from the realization of a need or gap in understanding, to the search for information from one or more sources to fill that gap, to the use of that information to complete a task at hand or to satisfy a curiosity, as well as other behaviors such as avoiding information or finding information serendipitously. Designers of mechanisms, tools, and computer-based systems to facilitate this seeking and search process often lack a full knowledge of the context surrounding the search. This context may vary depending on the job or role of the person; individual characteristics such as personality, domain knowledge, age, gender, perception of self, etc.; the task at hand; the source and the channel and their degree of accessibility and usability; and the relationship that the seeker shares with the source. Yet researchers have yet to agree on what context really means. While there have been various research studies incorporating context, and biennial conferences on context in information behavior, there lacks a clear definition of what context is, what its boundaries are, and what elements and variables comprise context. In this book, we look at the many definitions of and the theoretical and empirical studies on context, and I attempt to map the conceptual space of context in information behavior. I propose theoretical frameworks to map the boundaries, elements, and variables of context. I then discuss how to incorporate these frameworks and variables in the design of research studies on context. We then arrive at a unified definition of context. This book should provide designers of search systems a better understanding of context as they seek to meet the needs and demands of information seekers. It will be an important resource for researchers in Library and Information Science, especially doctoral students looking for one resource that covers an exhaustive range of the most current literature related to context, the best selection of classics, and a synthesis of these into theoretical frameworks and a unified definition. The book should help to move forward research in the field by clarifying the elements, variables, and views that are pertinent. In particular, the list of elements to be considered, and the variables associated with each element will be extremely useful to researchers wanting to include the influences of context in their studies.
  9. Meier, F.: Informationsverhalten in Social Media (2015) 0.01
    0.011093445 = product of:
      0.02218689 = sum of:
        0.02218689 = product of:
          0.04437378 = sum of:
            0.04437378 = weight(_text_:22 in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04437378 = score(doc=1739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.1, S.22-28
  10. Vlaeminck, S.; Wagner, G.G.: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern im Bereich der Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Zur Rolle von Forschungsdatenzentren beim Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten (2014) 0.01
    0.0097067645 = product of:
      0.019413529 = sum of:
        0.019413529 = product of:
          0.038827058 = sum of:
            0.038827058 = weight(_text_:22 in 2543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038827058 = score(doc=2543,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2543, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2543)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die Ergebnisse einer Analyse zusammengefasst, in der untersucht wurde, ob, und wenn ja welche Services für das Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten gegenwärtig bei wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften bestehen. Die Analyse wurde Mithilfe von Desktop-Research sowie einer Online-Befragung, an der sich 22 von 46 angeschriebenen Institutionen beteiligten, durchgeführt. Untersucht wurden vor allem deutsche und europäische Forschungsdatenzentren, Bibliotheken und Archive. Insbesondere wurde untersucht, ob diese Organisationen extern erzeugte Forschungsdaten, den dazugehörigen Berechnungscode (Syntax) und ggf. genutzte (selbstgeschriebene) Software grundsätzlich speichern und hosten. Weitere Themenfelder waren Metadatenstandards, Persistente Identifikatoren, Verfügbarkeit von Schnittstellen (APIs) und Unterstützung von semantischen Technologien.
  11. Lu, L.; Yuan, U.: Shall I Google it or ask the competent villain down the hall? : the moderating role of information need in information source selection (2011) 0.01
    0.0096520325 = product of:
      0.019304065 = sum of:
        0.019304065 = product of:
          0.03860813 = sum of:
            0.03860813 = weight(_text_:i in 4138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03860813 = score(doc=4138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4138)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Lin, S.; Xie, I.: Behavioral changes in transmuting multisession successive searches over the web (2013) 0.01
    0.0096520325 = product of:
      0.019304065 = sum of:
        0.019304065 = product of:
          0.03860813 = sum of:
            0.03860813 = weight(_text_:i in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03860813 = score(doc=959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Lueg, C.P.: ¬The missing link : information behavior research and its estranged relationship with embodiment (2015) 0.01
    0.0096520325 = product of:
      0.019304065 = sum of:
        0.019304065 = product of:
          0.03860813 = sum of:
            0.03860813 = weight(_text_:i in 2348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03860813 = score(doc=2348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 2348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2348)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this brief contribution I argue that an apparent dichotomy between information behavior seen as the behavior of individuals and their respective information styles and information behavior considered as a social practice may be resolved by considering the underresearched corporeality of the human body aka embodiment, which is a fundamental aspect of any kind of behavior, including information behavior. Practice is inherently embodied too, which means embodiment can be utilized as a vantage point to seek conceptual grounding for the rather diverse range of theories and models in information behavior research. The challenge then is to articulate in what ways and on what levels a particular approach contributes to advancing information behavior research. Conceptual clarity would also help information behavior models and theories developed in libraries and information science become more accessible and hopefully also more relevant to researchers in cognate disciplines.
  14. Brauer, T.; Ahlers, T.; Krumscheid, J.; Theis, N.; Brünner, M.: Basiswissen Informationskompetenz I-Ill an der Universitätsbibliothek Lüneburg : Vermittlung von lnformationskompetenz für Studienanfänger an der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg (2010) 0.01
    0.009100024 = product of:
      0.018200047 = sum of:
        0.018200047 = product of:
          0.036400095 = sum of:
            0.036400095 = weight(_text_:i in 3498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036400095 = score(doc=3498,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.2357331 = fieldWeight in 3498, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3498)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Dass das Berufsbild des Bibliothekars in den vergangenen Jahren keinen Paradigmenwechsel erlebte sondern sich um eine neue Kernaufgabe, die Vermittlung von Informations- und Medienkompetenz, erweiterte; zeigt das Beispiel der Universitätsbibliothek der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg. Dem Vermittlungsbedarf wissenschaftlicher Information wurde hier schon seit Jahren durch einen gut organisierten Auskunftsdienst, Informationsmaterialien und zusätzliche Informationsbereiche auf der Website der Bibliothek Rechnung getragen. Auch konnte die Bibliothek im Laufe der Zeit eine Reihe an regelmäßigen Katalog- und Datenbankschulungen anbieten, die allen Bibliotheksbenutzern - vor allem Studierenden und Mitarbeitern der Universität - offen stehen und dieses Angebot durch weitere interessante Veranstaltungen rund um Bibliotheksbenutzung, Recherche und wissenschaftliches Arbeiten ergänzen. Die Teilnahme erfolgt bis zum heutigen Tage auf freiwilliger Basis und ein großer Zulauf blieb zunächst aus, bis im Wintersemester 2007/2008 das Schulungsangebot der Bibliothek durch die feste Integration dreier Lehrveranstaltungen, Basiswissen Informationskompetenz I-III, in das jeweils startende erste Semester, das Leuphana Semester, erweitert wurde. Alle drei Veranstaltungen unterliegen der Teilnahmepflicht, wodurch sichergestellt werden soll, dass jede neue Studentin bzw. jeder neue Student nicht nur mit der eigenen Bibliothek vertraut gemacht sondern in die Lage versetzt wird, die ständig steigende Informationsflut zu beherrschen und relevante Informationen zu finden, zu beurteilen und zu verarbeiten. Ziel der drei Veranstaltungen ist dennoch nicht, Informationsspezialisten auszubilden, sondern einen Einstieg in Bibliotheksbenutzung, Recherche und Medienkompetenz zu bieten, Präsenz zu zeigen und das vielfältige Serviceangebot zu präsentieren. Das komprimierte, vermittelte Wissen kann anschließend im Rahmen regelmäßiger Schulungsangebote der Universitätsbibliothek vertieft werden.
  15. Smith, C.L.; Matteson, M.L.: Information literacy in the age of machines that learn : desiderata for machines that teach (2018) 0.01
    0.008320084 = product of:
      0.016640168 = sum of:
        0.016640168 = product of:
          0.033280335 = sum of:
            0.033280335 = weight(_text_:22 in 4954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033280335 = score(doc=4954,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4954, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4954)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 3.2019 14:33:22
  16. Knoll, A.: Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen (2016) 0.01
    0.008320084 = product of:
      0.016640168 = sum of:
        0.016640168 = product of:
          0.033280335 = sum of:
            0.033280335 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033280335 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 7.2016 16:22:54
  17. Hughes, B.; Wareham, J.; Joshi, I.: Doctors' online information needs, cognitive search strategies, and judgments of information quality and cognitive authority : how predictive judgments introduce bias into cognitive search models (2010) 0.01
    0.00804336 = product of:
      0.01608672 = sum of:
        0.01608672 = product of:
          0.03217344 = sum of:
            0.03217344 = weight(_text_:i in 3417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03217344 = score(doc=3417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 3417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Koshik, I.; Okazawa, H.: ¬A conversation analytic study of actual and potential problems in communication in library chat reference interactions (2012) 0.01
    0.00804336 = product of:
      0.01608672 = sum of:
        0.01608672 = product of:
          0.03217344 = sum of:
            0.03217344 = weight(_text_:i in 456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03217344 = score(doc=456,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 456, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=456)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Beheshti, J.; Cole, C.; Abuhimed, D.; Lamoureux, I.: Tracking middle school students' information behavior via Kuhlthau's ISP Model : temporality (2015) 0.01
    0.00804336 = product of:
      0.01608672 = sum of:
        0.01608672 = product of:
          0.03217344 = sum of:
            0.03217344 = weight(_text_:i in 1819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03217344 = score(doc=1819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 1819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1819)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Cole, C.; Beheshti, J.; Abuhimed, D.; Lamoureux, I.: ¬The end game in Kuhlthau's ISP Model : knowledge construction for grade 8 students researching an inquiry-based history project (2015) 0.01
    0.00804336 = product of:
      0.01608672 = sum of:
        0.01608672 = product of:
          0.03217344 = sum of:
            0.03217344 = weight(_text_:i in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03217344 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Languages

  • e 21
  • d 9

Types

  • a 27
  • el 3
  • m 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications