-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.02
0.01950678 = product of:
0.03901356 = sum of:
0.03901356 = product of:
0.19506781 = sum of:
0.19506781 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19506781 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3470846 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013)
0.02
0.019504113 = product of:
0.039008226 = sum of:
0.039008226 = product of:
0.07801645 = sum of:
0.07801645 = weight(_text_:i in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07801645 = score(doc=1077,freq=24.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.5052476 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
-
Lukasiewicz, T.: Uncertainty reasoning for the Semantic Web (2017)
0.02
0.01592504 = product of:
0.03185008 = sum of:
0.03185008 = product of:
0.06370016 = sum of:
0.06370016 = weight(_text_:i in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06370016 = score(doc=3939,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.41253293 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Semantic Web has attracted much attention, both from academia and industry. An important role in research towards the Semantic Web is played by formalisms and technologies for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness. In this paper, I first provide some motivating examples for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness in the Semantic Web. I then give an overview of some own formalisms for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness in the Semantic Web.
-
Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017)
0.01
0.013866806 = product of:
0.027733613 = sum of:
0.027733613 = product of:
0.055467226 = sum of:
0.055467226 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055467226 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13.12.2017 14:17:22
-
Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018)
0.01
0.013866806 = product of:
0.027733613 = sum of:
0.027733613 = product of:
0.055467226 = sum of:
0.055467226 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055467226 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27
-
Menzel, C.: Knowledge representation, the World Wide Web, and the evolution of logic (2011)
0.01
0.0136500355 = product of:
0.027300071 = sum of:
0.027300071 = product of:
0.054600142 = sum of:
0.054600142 = weight(_text_:i in 761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054600142 = score(doc=761,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 761, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=761)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this paper, I have traced a series of evolutionary adaptations of FOL motivated entirely by its use by knowledge engineers to represent and share information on the Web culminating in the development of Common Logic. While the primary goal in this paper has been to document this evolution, it is arguable, I think that CL's syntactic and semantic egalitarianism better realizes the goal "topic neutrality" that a logic should ideally exemplify - understood, at least in part, as the idea that logic should as far as possible not itself embody any metaphysical presuppositions. Instead of retaining the traditional metaphysical divisions of FOL that reflect its Fregean origins, CL begins as it were with a single, metaphysically homogeneous domain in which, potentially, anything can play the traditional roles of object, property, relation, and function. Note that the effect of this is not to destroy traditional metaphysical divisions. Rather, it simply to refrain from building those divisions explicitly into one's logic; instead, such divisions are left to the user to introduce and enforce axiomatically in an explicit metaphysical theory.
-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.01
0.013004521 = product of:
0.026009042 = sum of:
0.026009042 = product of:
0.1300452 = sum of:
0.1300452 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1300452 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3470846 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
-
Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015)
0.01
0.011766376 = product of:
0.023532752 = sum of:
0.023532752 = product of:
0.047065504 = sum of:
0.047065504 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047065504 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 16:54:03
22. 1.2017 17:10:56
-
Atanassova, I.; Bertin, M.: Semantic facets for scientific information retrieval (2014)
0.01
0.011260705 = product of:
0.02252141 = sum of:
0.02252141 = product of:
0.04504282 = sum of:
0.04504282 = weight(_text_:i in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04504282 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Deokattey, S.; Neelameghan, A.; Kumar, V.: ¬A method for developing a domain ontology : a case study for a multidisciplinary subject (2010)
0.01
0.0097067645 = product of:
0.019413529 = sum of:
0.019413529 = product of:
0.038827058 = sum of:
0.038827058 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038827058 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 19:41:16
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.01
0.0097067645 = product of:
0.019413529 = sum of:
0.019413529 = product of:
0.038827058 = sum of:
0.038827058 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038827058 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Madalli, D.P.; Balaji, B.P.; Sarangi, A.K.: Music domain analysis for building faceted ontological representation (2014)
0.01
0.0097067645 = product of:
0.019413529 = sum of:
0.019413529 = product of:
0.038827058 = sum of:
0.038827058 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038827058 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Halpin, H.; Hayes, P.J.; McCusker, J.P.; McGuinness, D.L.; Thompson, H.S.: When owl:sameAs isn't the same : an analysis of identity in linked data (2010)
0.01
0.0096520325 = product of:
0.019304065 = sum of:
0.019304065 = product of:
0.03860813 = sum of:
0.03860813 = weight(_text_:i in 4703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03860813 = score(doc=4703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010. 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. Eds.: Peter F. Patel-Schneider et al
-
Schulz, S.; Schober, D.; Tudose, I.; Stenzhorn, H.: ¬The pitfalls of thesaurus ontologization : the case of the NCI thesaurus (2010)
0.01
0.0096520325 = product of:
0.019304065 = sum of:
0.019304065 = product of:
0.03860813 = sum of:
0.03860813 = weight(_text_:i in 4885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03860813 = score(doc=4885,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4885, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4885)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Solskinnsbakk, G.; Gulla, J.A.: Contextual search navigation using semantic tag signatures (2011)
0.01
0.0096520325 = product of:
0.019304065 = sum of:
0.019304065 = product of:
0.03860813 = sum of:
0.03860813 = weight(_text_:i in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03860813 = score(doc=1033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- I-KNOW '11: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, Article 34
-
Buizza, G.: Subject analysis and indexing : an "Italian version" of the analytico-synthetic model (2011)
0.01
0.0096520325 = product of:
0.019304065 = sum of:
0.019304065 = product of:
0.03860813 = sum of:
0.03860813 = weight(_text_:i in 1812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03860813 = score(doc=1812,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1812, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1812)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Location
- I
-
Rosemblat, G.; Resnick, M.P.; Auston, I.; Shin, D.; Sneiderman, C.; Fizsman, M.; Rindflesch, T.C.: Extending SemRep to the public health domain (2013)
0.01
0.0096520325 = product of:
0.019304065 = sum of:
0.019304065 = product of:
0.03860813 = sum of:
0.03860813 = weight(_text_:i in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03860813 = score(doc=2096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
¬The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010 : 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. (2010)
0.01
0.009100024 = product of:
0.018200047 = sum of:
0.018200047 = product of:
0.036400095 = sum of:
0.036400095 = weight(_text_:i in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036400095 = score(doc=4707,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.2357331 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The two-volume set LNCS 6496 and 6497 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, held in Shanghai, China, during November 7-11, 2010. Part I contains 51 papers out of 578 submissions to the research track. Part II contains 18 papers out of 66 submissions to the semantic Web in-use track, 6 papers out of 26 submissions to the doctoral consortium track, and also 4 invited talks. Each submitted paper were carefully reviewed. The International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC) constitute the major international venue where the latest research results and technical innovations on all aspects of the Semantic Web are presented. ISWC brings together researchers, practitioners, and users from the areas of artificial intelligence, databases, social networks, distributed computing, Web engineering, information systems, natural language processing, soft computing, and human computer interaction to discuss the major challenges and proposed solutions, the success stories and failures, as well the visions that can advance research and drive innovation in the Semantic Web.
-
Hohmann, G.: ¬Die Anwendung des CIDOC-CRM für die semantische Wissensrepräsentation in den Kulturwissenschaften (2010)
0.01
0.008320084 = product of:
0.016640168 = sum of:
0.016640168 = product of:
0.033280335 = sum of:
0.033280335 = weight(_text_:22 in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033280335 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Semenova, E.: Ontologie als Begriffssystem : Theoretische Überlegungen und ihre praktische Umsetzung bei der Entwicklung einer Ontologie der Wissenschaftsdisziplinen (2010)
0.01
0.008320084 = product of:
0.016640168 = sum of:
0.016640168 = product of:
0.033280335 = sum of:
0.033280335 = weight(_text_:22 in 4095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033280335 = score(doc=4095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
