Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × type_ss:"x"
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.12
    0.11663525 = sum of:
      0.07802712 = product of:
        0.39013562 = sum of:
          0.39013562 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.39013562 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3470846 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04093939 = queryNorm
              1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.03860813 = product of:
        0.07721626 = sum of:
          0.07721626 = weight(_text_:i in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07721626 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04093939 = queryNorm
              0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
    Footnote
    Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde Vorgelegt der Philosophischen Fakultät I der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
  2. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.06
    0.055261366 = sum of:
      0.032511305 = product of:
        0.16255651 = sum of:
          0.16255651 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16255651 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3470846 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04093939 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.02275006 = product of:
        0.04550012 = sum of:
          0.04550012 = weight(_text_:i in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04550012 = score(doc=855,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04093939 = queryNorm
              0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Converting UDC numbers manually to a complex format such as the one mentioned above is an unrealistic expectation; supporting building these representations, as far as possible automatically, is a well-founded requirement. An additional advantage of this approach is that the existing records could also be processed and converted. In my dissertation I would like to prove also that it is possible to design and implement an algorithm that is able to convert pre-coordinated UDC numbers into the introduced format by identifying all their elements and revealing their whole syntactic structure as well. In my dissertation I will discuss a feasible way of building a UDC-specific XML schema for describing the most detailed and complicated UDC numbers (containing not only the common auxiliary signs and numbers, but also the different types of special auxiliaries). The schema definition is available online at: http://piros.udc-interpreter.hu#xsd. The primary goal of my research is to prove that it is possible to support building, retrieving, and analyzing UDC numbers without compromises, by taking the whole syntactic richness of the scheme by storing the UDC numbers reserving the meaning of pre-coordination. The research has also included the implementation of a software that parses UDC classmarks attended to prove that such solution can be applied automatically without any additional effort or even retrospectively on existing collections.
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  3. Jäger-Dengler-Harles, I.: Informationsvisualisierung und Retrieval im Fokus der Infromationspraxis (2013) 0.04
    0.03594423 = product of:
      0.07188846 = sum of:
        0.07188846 = sum of:
          0.03860813 = weight(_text_:i in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03860813 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04093939 = queryNorm
              0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
          0.033280335 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033280335 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04093939 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 2.2015 9:22:39
  4. Bertram, J.: Informationen verzweifelt gesucht : Enterprise Search in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2011) 0.04
    0.035697345 = product of:
      0.07139469 = sum of:
        0.07139469 = sum of:
          0.03217344 = weight(_text_:i in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03217344 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04093939 = queryNorm
              0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.03922125 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03922125 = score(doc=2657,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04093939 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit geht dem Status quo der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen nach und beleuchtet Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Aus der Analyse des Ist-Zustands wird der Bedarf an Enterprise-Search-Software abgeleitet und es werden Rahmenbedingungen für deren erfolgreiche Einführung skizziert. Die Untersuchung stützt sich auf eine im Jahr 2009 durchgeführte Onlinebefragung von 469 österreichischen Großunternehmen (Rücklauf 22 %) und daran anschließende Leitfadeninterviews mit zwölf Teilnehmern der Onlinebefragung. Der theoretische Teil verortet die Arbeit im Kontext des Informations- und Wissensmanagements. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Ansatz der Enterprise Search, ihrer Abgrenzung gegenüber der Suche im Internet und ihrem Leistungsspektrum. Im empirischen Teil wird zunächst aufgezeigt, wie die Unternehmen ihre Informationen organisieren und welche Probleme dabei auftreten. Es folgt eine Analyse des Status quo der Informati-onssuche im Unternehmen. Abschließend werden Bekanntheit und Einsatz von Enterprise-Search-Software in der Zielgruppe untersucht sowie für die Einführung dieser Software nötige Rahmenbedingungen benannt. Defizite machen die Befragten insbesondere im Hinblick auf die übergreifende Suche im Unternehmen und die Suche nach Kompetenzträgern aus. Hier werden Lücken im Wissensmanagement offenbar. 29 % der Respondenten der Onlinebefragung geben zu-dem an, dass es in ihren Unternehmen gelegentlich bis häufig zu Fehlentscheidungen infolge defizitärer Informationslagen kommt. Enterprise-Search-Software kommt in 17 % der Unternehmen, die sich an der Onlinebefragung beteiligten, zum Einsatz. Die durch Enterprise-Search-Software bewirkten Veränderungen werden grundsätzlich posi-tiv beurteilt. Alles in allem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass Enterprise-Search-Strategien nur Erfolg haben können, wenn man sie in umfassende Maßnahmen des Informations- und Wissensmanagements einbettet.
    Content
    Dissertation am Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft der Philosophische Fakultät I an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Vgl.: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/dissertationen/bertram-jutta-2011-06-30/PDF/bertram.pdf.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 20:40:31
  5. Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013) 0.02
    0.019504113 = product of:
      0.039008226 = sum of:
        0.039008226 = product of:
          0.07801645 = sum of:
            0.07801645 = weight(_text_:i in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07801645 = score(doc=1077,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.5052476 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
  6. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.02
    0.016255653 = product of:
      0.032511305 = sum of:
        0.032511305 = product of:
          0.16255651 = sum of:
            0.16255651 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16255651 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3470846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  7. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.02
    0.016255653 = product of:
      0.032511305 = sum of:
        0.032511305 = product of:
          0.16255651 = sum of:
            0.16255651 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16255651 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3470846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  8. Thornton, K: Powerful structure : inspecting infrastructures of information organization in Wikimedia Foundation projects (2016) 0.01
    0.0136500355 = product of:
      0.027300071 = sum of:
        0.027300071 = product of:
          0.054600142 = sum of:
            0.054600142 = weight(_text_:i in 3288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054600142 = score(doc=3288,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 3288, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This dissertation investigates the social and technological factors of collaboratively organizing information in commons-based peer production systems. To do so, it analyzes the diverse strategies that members of Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) project communities use to organize information. Key findings from this dissertation show that conceptual structures of information organization are encoded into the infrastructure of WMF projects. The fact that WMF projects are commons-based peer production systems means that we can inspect the code that enables these systems, but a specific type of technical literacy is required to do so. I use three methods in this dissertation. I conduct a qualitative content analysis of the discussions surrounding the design, implementation and evaluation of the category system; a quantitative analysis using descriptive statistics of patterns of editing among editors who contributed to the code of templates for information boxes; and a close reading of the infrastructure used to create the category system, the infobox templates, and the knowledge base of structured data.
  9. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.01
    0.013004521 = product of:
      0.026009042 = sum of:
        0.026009042 = product of:
          0.1300452 = sum of:
            0.1300452 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1300452 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3470846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  10. Pohl, O.: Konzept und prototypische Erstellung eines Informationssystems auf VuFind-Basis für die Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft (2012) 0.01
    0.012869377 = product of:
      0.025738753 = sum of:
        0.025738753 = product of:
          0.051477507 = sum of:
            0.051477507 = weight(_text_:i in 1564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051477507 = score(doc=1564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 1564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Bachelorarbeit, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Philosophische Fakultät I, publiziert am 23.12.2012.
  11. Glaesener, L.: Automatisches Indexieren einer informationswissenschaftlichen Datenbank mit Mehrwortgruppen (2012) 0.01
    0.011093445 = product of:
      0.02218689 = sum of:
        0.02218689 = product of:
          0.04437378 = sum of:
            0.04437378 = weight(_text_:22 in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04437378 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2012 19:43:22
  12. Becker, T.: Potentielle Funktionen von Wissensmanagement in Öffentlichen Bibliotheken : eine szenariobasierte Delphi-Studie mit Wissensexperten aus britischen und deutschen Großstadtbibliotheken (2014) 0.01
    0.009100024 = product of:
      0.018200047 = sum of:
        0.018200047 = product of:
          0.036400095 = sum of:
            0.036400095 = weight(_text_:i in 2093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036400095 = score(doc=2093,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.2357331 = fieldWeight in 2093, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2093)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor philosophiae (Dr. phil.) eingereicht an der Philosophischen Fakultät I der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
    Imprint
    Berlin : Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin / Philosophische Fakultät I
  13. Köbler, J.; Niederklapfer, T.: Kreuzkonkordanzen zwischen RVK-BK-MSC-PACS der Fachbereiche Mathematik un Physik (2010) 0.01
    0.008320084 = product of:
      0.016640168 = sum of:
        0.016640168 = product of:
          0.033280335 = sum of:
            0.033280335 = weight(_text_:22 in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033280335 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  14. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.01
    0.008320084 = product of:
      0.016640168 = sum of:
        0.016640168 = product of:
          0.033280335 = sum of:
            0.033280335 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033280335 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  15. Weiner, U.: Vor uns die Dokumentenflut oder Automatische Indexierung als notwendige und sinnvolle Ergänzung zur intellektuellen Sacherschließung (2012) 0.01
    0.00804336 = product of:
      0.01608672 = sum of:
        0.01608672 = product of:
          0.03217344 = sum of:
            0.03217344 = weight(_text_:i in 598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03217344 = score(doc=598,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 598, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=598)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Vor dem Hintergrund veränderter Ansprüche der Bibliotheksbenutzer an Recherchemöglichkeiten - weg vom klassischen Online-Katalog hin zum "One-Stop-Shop" mit Funktionalitäten wie thematisches Browsing, Relevanzranking und dergleichen mehr - einerseits und der notwendigen Bearbeitung von Massendaten (Stichwort Dokumentenflut) andererseits rücken Systeme zur automatischen Indexierung wieder verstärkt in den Mittelpunkt des Interesses. Da in Österreich die Beschäftigung mit diesem Thema im Bibliotheksbereich bislang nur sehr selektiv, bezogen auf wenige konkrete Projekte, erfolgte, wird zuerst ein allgemeiner theoretischer Überblick über die unterschiedlichen Verfahrensansätze der automatischen Indexierung geboten. Im nächsten Schritt werden mit der IDX-basierten Indexierungssoftware MILOS (mit den Teilprojekten MILOS I, MILOS II und KASCADE) und dem modularen System intelligentCAPTURE (mit der integrierten Indexierungssoftware AUTINDEX) die bis vor wenigen Jahren im deutschsprachigen Raum einzigen im Praxiseinsatz befindlichen automatischen Indexierungssysteme vorgestellt. Mit zunehmender Notwendigkeit, neue Wege der inhaltlichen Erschließung zu beschreiten, wurden in den vergangenen 5 - 6 Jahren zahlreiche Softwareentwicklungen auf ihre Einsatzmöglichkeit im Bibliotheksbereich hin getestet. Stellvertretend für diese in Entwicklung befindlichen Systeme zur automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung wird das Projekt PETRUS, welches in den Jahren 2009 - 2011 an der DNB durchgeführt wurde und die Komponenten PICA Match&Merge sowie die Extraction Platform der Firma Averbis beinhaltet, vorgestellt.
  16. Weisbrod, D.: ¬Die präkustodiale Intervention als Baustein der Langzeitarchivierung digitaler Schriftstellernachlässe (2015) 0.01
    0.00804336 = product of:
      0.01608672 = sum of:
        0.01608672 = product of:
          0.03217344 = sum of:
            0.03217344 = weight(_text_:i in 2353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03217344 = score(doc=2353,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 2353, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2353)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Imprint
    Berlin : Humboldt-Universität, Philosophische Fakultät I
  17. Geisriegler, E.: Enriching electronic texts with semantic metadata : a use case for the historical Newspaper Collection ANNO (Austrian Newspapers Online) of the Austrian National Libraryhek (2012) 0.01
    0.006933403 = product of:
      0.013866806 = sum of:
        0.013866806 = product of:
          0.027733613 = sum of:
            0.027733613 = weight(_text_:22 in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027733613 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 2.2013 18:00:22
  18. Nagy T., I.: Detecting multiword expressions and named entities in natural language texts (2014) 0.01
    0.0056303525 = product of:
      0.011260705 = sum of:
        0.011260705 = product of:
          0.02252141 = sum of:
            0.02252141 = weight(_text_:i in 1536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02252141 = score(doc=1536,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.14585242 = fieldWeight in 1536, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1536)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Kiren, T.: ¬A clustering based indexing technique of modularized ontologies for information retrieval (2017) 0.01
    0.0055467226 = product of:
      0.011093445 = sum of:
        0.011093445 = product of:
          0.02218689 = sum of:
            0.02218689 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02218689 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04093939 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22