Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Egghe, L."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.04
    0.03509156 = product of:
      0.07018312 = sum of:
        0.07018312 = sum of:
          0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033119414 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.037063707 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037063707 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  2. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: Fundamental properties of rhythm sequences (2008) 0.02
    0.01931966 = product of:
      0.03863932 = sum of:
        0.03863932 = product of:
          0.07727864 = sum of:
            0.07727864 = weight(_text_:r in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07727864 = score(doc=1965,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Fundamental mathematical properties of rhythm sequences are studied. In particular, a set of three axioms for valid rhythm indicators is proposed, and it is shown that the R-indicator satisfies only two out of three but that the R-indicator satisfies all three. This fills a critical, logical gap in the study of these indicator sequences. Matrices leading to a constant R-sequence are called baseline matrices. They are characterized as matrices with constant w-year diachronous impact factors. The relation with classical impact factors is clarified. Using regression analysis matrices with a rhythm sequence that is on average equal to 1 (smaller than 1, larger than 1) are characterized.
  3. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011) 0.01
    0.011709481 = product of:
      0.023418961 = sum of:
        0.023418961 = product of:
          0.046837922 = sum of:
            0.046837922 = weight(_text_:r in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046837922 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Duality in information retrieval and the hypegeometric distribution (1997) 0.01
    0.011039805 = product of:
      0.02207961 = sum of:
        0.02207961 = product of:
          0.04415922 = sum of:
            0.04415922 = weight(_text_:r in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04415922 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature (2000) 0.01
    0.011039805 = product of:
      0.02207961 = sum of:
        0.02207961 = product of:
          0.04415922 = sum of:
            0.04415922 = weight(_text_:r in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04415922 = score(doc=4385,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model (2009) 0.01
    0.011039805 = product of:
      0.02207961 = sum of:
        0.02207961 = product of:
          0.04415922 = sum of:
            0.04415922 = weight(_text_:r in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04415922 = score(doc=6759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Egghe, L.: Mathematical study of h-index sequences (2009) 0.01
    0.009757902 = product of:
      0.019515803 = sum of:
        0.019515803 = product of:
          0.039031606 = sum of:
            0.039031606 = weight(_text_:r in 4217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039031606 = score(doc=4217,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.25861394 = fieldWeight in 4217, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper studies mathematical properties of h-index sequences as developed by Liang [Liang, L. (2006). h-Index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications. Scientometrics, 69(1), 153-159]. For practical reasons, Liming studies such sequences where the time goes backwards while it is more logical to use the time going forward (real career periods). Both type of h-index sequences are studied here and their interrelations are revealed. We show cases where these sequences are convex, linear and concave. We also show that, when one of the sequences is convex then the other one is concave, showing that the reverse-time sequence, in general, cannot be used to derive similar properties of the (difficult to obtain) forward time sequence. We show that both sequences are the same if and only if the author produces the same number of papers per year. If the author produces an increasing number of papers per year, then Liang's h-sequences are above the "normal" ones. All these results are also valid for g- and R-sequences. The results are confirmed by the h-, g- and R-sequences (forward and reverse time) of the author.
  8. Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018) 0.01
    0.009757902 = product of:
      0.019515803 = sum of:
        0.019515803 = product of:
          0.039031606 = sum of:
            0.039031606 = weight(_text_:r in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039031606 = score(doc=5226,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.25861394 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Rousseau, S.: TOP-curves (2007) 0.01
    0.00965983 = product of:
      0.01931966 = sum of:
        0.01931966 = product of:
          0.03863932 = sum of:
            0.03863932 = weight(_text_:r in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03863932 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990) 0.01
    0.00965983 = product of:
      0.01931966 = sum of:
        0.01931966 = product of:
          0.03863932 = sum of:
            0.03863932 = weight(_text_:r in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03863932 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012) 0.01
    0.00965983 = product of:
      0.01931966 = sum of:
        0.01931966 = product of:
          0.03863932 = sum of:
            0.03863932 = weight(_text_:r in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03863932 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Egghe, L.: Remarks on the paper by A. De Visscher, "what does the g-index really measure?" (2012) 0.01
    0.00965983 = product of:
      0.01931966 = sum of:
        0.01931966 = product of:
          0.03863932 = sum of:
            0.03863932 = weight(_text_:r in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03863932 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The author presents a different view on properties of impact measures than given in the paper of De Visscher (2011). He argues that a good impact measure works better when citations are concentrated rather than spread out over articles. The author also presents theoretical evidence that the g-index and the R-index can be close to the square root of the total number of citations, whereas this is not the case for the A-index. Here the author confirms an assertion of De Visscher.
  13. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000) 0.01
    0.0082798535 = product of:
      0.016559707 = sum of:
        0.016559707 = product of:
          0.033119414 = sum of:
            0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033119414 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization : definitions and relations (2000) 0.01
    0.0082798535 = product of:
      0.016559707 = sum of:
        0.016559707 = product of:
          0.033119414 = sum of:
            0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033119414 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Egghe, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Salton's cosine measure (2009) 0.01
    0.0082798535 = product of:
      0.016559707 = sum of:
        0.016559707 = product of:
          0.033119414 = sum of:
            0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 2803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033119414 = score(doc=2803,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2803, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2803)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Egghe, L.: Influence of adding or deleting items and sources on the h-index (2010) 0.01
    0.0082798535 = product of:
      0.016559707 = sum of:
        0.016559707 = product of:
          0.033119414 = sum of:
            0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033119414 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Adding or deleting items such as self-citations has an influence on the h-index of an author. This influence will be proved mathematically in this article. We hereby prove the experimental finding in E. Gianoli and M.A. Molina-Montenegro ([2009]) that the influence of adding or deleting self-citations on the h-index is greater for low values of the h-index. Why this is logical also is shown by a simple theoretical example. Adding or deleting sources such as adding or deleting minor contributions of an author also has an influence on the h-index of this author; this influence is modeled in this article. This model explains some practical examples found in X. Hu, R. Rousseau, and J. Chen (in press).
  17. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Applications of the generalized law of Benford to informetric data (2012) 0.01
    0.0082798535 = product of:
      0.016559707 = sum of:
        0.016559707 = product of:
          0.033119414 = sum of:
            0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033119414 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)