Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.03
    0.030886423 = product of:
      0.061772846 = sum of:
        0.061772846 = product of:
          0.12354569 = sum of:
            0.12354569 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12354569 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  2. De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014) 0.01
    0.010919999 = product of:
      0.021839999 = sum of:
        0.021839999 = product of:
          0.043679997 = sum of:
            0.043679997 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043679997 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:01:18
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Dahlberg, I.: Library catalogs in the Internet : switching for future subject access (1996) 0.01
    0.0082798535 = product of:
      0.016559707 = sum of:
        0.016559707 = product of:
          0.033119414 = sum of:
            0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033119414 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
  4. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (1975) 0.01
    0.0082798535 = product of:
      0.016559707 = sum of:
        0.016559707 = product of:
          0.033119414 = sum of:
            0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033119414 = score(doc=2103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields
  5. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (2015) 0.01
    0.006899878 = product of:
      0.013799756 = sum of:
        0.013799756 = product of:
          0.027599512 = sum of:
            0.027599512 = weight(_text_:r in 2104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027599512 = score(doc=2104,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2104, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2104)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields.

Years