-
Milstead, J.L.; Borko, H.: Shoes for the Cobbler's children : the ASIS thesaurus (1994)
0.04
0.042983495 = product of:
0.08596699 = sum of:
0.08596699 = product of:
0.12895048 = sum of:
0.043175068 = weight(_text_:h in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043175068 = score(doc=203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
0.08577541 = weight(_text_:22 in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08577541 = score(doc=203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 21(1994) no.1, S.22-24
-
Borko, H.: Informationswissenschaft : was ist das? (1968)
0.01
0.011630241 = product of:
0.023260482 = sum of:
0.023260482 = product of:
0.069781445 = sum of:
0.069781445 = weight(_text_:h in 4981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069781445 = score(doc=4981,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.6211123 = fieldWeight in 4981, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4981)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 19(1968) H.3, S.59-61
-
Borko, H.: Research in computer based classification systems (1985)
0.01
0.01102596 = product of:
0.02205192 = sum of:
0.02205192 = product of:
0.033077877 = sum of:
0.02228411 = weight(_text_:k in 3647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02228411 = score(doc=3647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 3647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3647)
0.010793767 = weight(_text_:h in 3647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010793767 = score(doc=3647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.096073404 = fieldWeight in 3647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3647)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The selection in this reader by R. M. Needham and K. Sparck Jones reports an early approach to automatic classification that was taken in England. The following selection reviews various approaches that were being pursued in the United States at about the same time. It then discusses a particular approach initiated in the early 1960s by Harold Borko, at that time Head of the Language Processing and Retrieval Research Staff at the System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California and, since 1966, a member of the faculty at the Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of California, Los Angeles. As was described earlier, there are two steps in automatic classification, the first being to identify pairs of terms that are similar by virtue of co-occurring as index terms in the same documents, and the second being to form equivalence classes of intersubstitutable terms. To compute similarities, Borko and his associates used a standard correlation formula; to derive classification categories, where Needham and Sparck Jones used clumping, the Borko team used the statistical technique of factor analysis. The fact that documents can be classified automatically, and in any number of ways, is worthy of passing notice. Worthy of serious attention would be a demonstra tion that a computer-based classification system was effective in the organization and retrieval of documents. One reason for the inclusion of the following selection in the reader is that it addresses the question of evaluation. To evaluate the effectiveness of their automatically derived classification, Borko and his team asked three questions. The first was Is the classification reliable? in other words, could the categories derived from one sample of texts be used to classify other texts? Reliability was assessed by a case-study comparison of the classes derived from three different samples of abstracts. The notso-surprising conclusion reached was that automatically derived classes were reliable only to the extent that the sample from which they were derived was representative of the total document collection. The second evaluation question asked whether the classification was reasonable, in the sense of adequately describing the content of the document collection. The answer was sought by comparing the automatically derived categories with categories in a related classification system that was manually constructed. Here the conclusion was that the automatic method yielded categories that fairly accurately reflected the major area of interest in the sample collection of texts; however, since there were only eleven such categories and they were quite broad, they could not be regarded as suitable for use in a university or any large general library. The third evaluation question asked whether automatic classification was accurate, in the sense of producing results similar to those obtainabie by human cIassifiers. When using human classification as a criterion, automatic classification was found to be 50 percent accurate.
-
Borko, H.: Getting started in library expert systems research (1987)
0.01
0.008223822 = product of:
0.016447645 = sum of:
0.016447645 = product of:
0.049342934 = sum of:
0.049342934 = weight(_text_:h in 1090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049342934 = score(doc=1090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 1090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1090)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Borko, H.: ¬A note commenting on 'vocabulary control and information technology' by Derek Austin (1986)
0.01
0.008223822 = product of:
0.016447645 = sum of:
0.016447645 = product of:
0.049342934 = sum of:
0.049342934 = weight(_text_:h in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049342934 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Borko, H.: Toward a theory of indexing (1977)
0.01
0.008223822 = product of:
0.016447645 = sum of:
0.016447645 = product of:
0.049342934 = sum of:
0.049342934 = weight(_text_:h in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049342934 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Borko, H.; Bernick, M.: Automatic document classification : T.2 (1964)
0.01
0.008223822 = product of:
0.016447645 = sum of:
0.016447645 = product of:
0.049342934 = sum of:
0.049342934 = weight(_text_:h in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049342934 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Borko, H.: Determining user requirements for an information storage and retrieval system : a systems approach (1962)
0.01
0.008223822 = product of:
0.016447645 = sum of:
0.016447645 = product of:
0.049342934 = sum of:
0.049342934 = weight(_text_:h in 4980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049342934 = score(doc=4980,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 4980, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4980)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ercegovac, Z.; Borko, H.: Design and implementation of an experimental cataloging advisor : Mapper (1992)
0.01
0.008223822 = product of:
0.016447645 = sum of:
0.016447645 = product of:
0.049342934 = sum of:
0.049342934 = weight(_text_:h in 5377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049342934 = score(doc=5377,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 5377, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5377)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ercegovac, Z.; Borko, H.: Performance evaluation of Mapper (1992)
0.01
0.008223822 = product of:
0.016447645 = sum of:
0.016447645 = product of:
0.049342934 = sum of:
0.049342934 = weight(_text_:h in 5378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049342934 = score(doc=5378,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 5378, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5378)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Borko, H.; Bernick, M.: Automatic document classification : T.1 (1963)
0.01
0.008223822 = product of:
0.016447645 = sum of:
0.016447645 = product of:
0.049342934 = sum of:
0.049342934 = weight(_text_:h in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049342934 = score(doc=5487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Borko, H.: Design of information systems and services (1967)
0.01
0.008223822 = product of:
0.016447645 = sum of:
0.016447645 = product of:
0.049342934 = sum of:
0.049342934 = weight(_text_:h in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049342934 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Borko, H.; Tarr, D.: Factors influencing inter-indexer consistency (1974)
0.01
0.007195845 = product of:
0.01439169 = sum of:
0.01439169 = product of:
0.043175068 = sum of:
0.043175068 = weight(_text_:h in 7507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043175068 = score(doc=7507,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 7507, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7507)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Borko, H.: ¬The role of classification in online retrieval systems and automated libraries (1982)
0.01
0.006167867 = product of:
0.012335734 = sum of:
0.012335734 = product of:
0.0370072 = sum of:
0.0370072 = weight(_text_:h in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0370072 = score(doc=37,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Borko, H.; Bernier, C.L.: Indexing concept and methods (1978)
0.01
0.005139889 = product of:
0.010279778 = sum of:
0.010279778 = product of:
0.030839335 = sum of:
0.030839335 = weight(_text_:h in 3021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030839335 = score(doc=3021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3021)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Borko, H.; Bernier, C.L.: Abstracting concepts and methods (1975)
0.00
0.004111911 = product of:
0.008223822 = sum of:
0.008223822 = product of:
0.024671467 = sum of:
0.024671467 = weight(_text_:h in 929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024671467 = score(doc=929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=929)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Borko, H.; Chatman, S.: Criteria for acceptable abstracts : a survey of abstractors' instructions (1963)
0.00
0.0035979224 = product of:
0.007195845 = sum of:
0.007195845 = product of:
0.021587534 = sum of:
0.021587534 = weight(_text_:h in 687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021587534 = score(doc=687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=687)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
