-
Järvelin, K.; Persson, O.: ¬The DCI-index : discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation (2008)
0.03
0.032234862 = product of:
0.064469725 = sum of:
0.064469725 = product of:
0.09670458 = sum of:
0.072033115 = weight(_text_:k in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072033115 = score(doc=2332,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.44622225 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
0.024671467 = weight(_text_:h in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024671467 = score(doc=2332,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The article by K. Järvelin & O. Persson published in JASIST 59(9), The DCI-Index: Discounted Cumulated Impact-Based Research Evaluation, (pp. 1433-1440) contains an unfortunate error in one of its formulas, Equation 3. The present paper gives the correction and an example of impact analysis based on the corrected formula.
- Object
- h-index
-
Järvelin, K.; Persson, O.: ¬The DCI index : discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation (2008)
0.02
0.023909448 = product of:
0.047818895 = sum of:
0.047818895 = product of:
0.07172834 = sum of:
0.045020696 = weight(_text_:k in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045020696 = score(doc=2694,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
0.026707647 = weight(_text_:h in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026707647 = score(doc=2694,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.23772003 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research evaluation is increasingly popular and important among research funding bodies and science policy makers. Various indicators have been proposed to evaluate the standing of individual scientists, institutions, journals, or countries. A simple and popular one among the indicators is the h-index, the Hirsch index (Hirsch 2005), which is an indicator for lifetime achievement of a scholar. Several other indicators have been proposed to complement or balance the h-index. However, these indicators have no conception of aging. The AR-index (Jin et al. 2007) incorporates aging but divides the received citation counts by the raw age of the publication. Consequently, the decay of a publication is very steep and insensitive to disciplinary differences. In addition, we believe that a publication becomes outdated only when it is no longer cited, not because of its age. Finally, all indicators treat citations as equally material when one might reasonably think that a citation from a heavily cited publication should weigh more than a citation froma non-cited or little-cited publication.We propose a new indicator, the Discounted Cumulated Impact (DCI) index, which devalues old citations in a smooth way. It rewards an author for receiving new citations even if the publication is old. Further, it allows weighting of the citations by the citation weight of the citing publication. DCI can be used to calculate research performance on the basis of the h-core of a scholar or any other publication data.
- Content
- Erratum in: Järvelin, K., O. Persson: The DCI-index: discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation. Erratum re. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.14, S.2350-2352.
-
Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023)
0.02
0.020822838 = product of:
0.041645676 = sum of:
0.041645676 = product of:
0.062468514 = sum of:
0.03183444 = weight(_text_:k in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03183444 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.030634077 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030634077 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:15:06
-
Niemi, T.; Hirvonen, L.; Järvelin, K.: Multidimensional data model and query language for informetrics (2003)
0.01
0.006366888 = product of:
0.012733776 = sum of:
0.012733776 = product of:
0.03820133 = sum of:
0.03820133 = weight(_text_:k in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03820133 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ahlgren, P.; Järvelin, K.: Measuring impact of twelve information scientists using the DCI index (2010)
0.01
0.006366888 = product of:
0.012733776 = sum of:
0.012733776 = product of:
0.03820133 = sum of:
0.03820133 = weight(_text_:k in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03820133 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Tuomaala, O.; Järvelin, K.; Vakkari, P.: Evolution of library and information science, 1965-2005 : content analysis of journal articles (2014)
0.01
0.00530574 = product of:
0.01061148 = sum of:
0.01061148 = product of:
0.03183444 = sum of:
0.03183444 = weight(_text_:k in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03183444 = score(doc=1309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Järvelin, K.; Vakkari, P.: LIS research across 50 years: content analysis of journal articles : offering an information-centric conception of memes (2022)
0.01
0.00530574 = product of:
0.01061148 = sum of:
0.01061148 = product of:
0.03183444 = sum of:
0.03183444 = weight(_text_:k in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03183444 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
