Search (107 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.04
    0.036842998 = product of:
      0.073685996 = sum of:
        0.073685996 = product of:
          0.11052899 = sum of:
            0.0370072 = weight(_text_:h in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0370072 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
            0.073521785 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073521785 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1985, Nürnberg, 1.-4.10.1985: Fachinformation: Methodik - Management - Markt; neue Entwicklungen, Berufe, Produkte. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  2. Weller, K.; Stock, W.G.: Transitive meronymy : automatic concept-based query expansion using weighted transitive part-whole relations (2008) 0.02
    0.02205192 = product of:
      0.04410384 = sum of:
        0.04410384 = product of:
          0.066155754 = sum of:
            0.04456822 = weight(_text_:k in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04456822 = score(doc=1835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
            0.021587534 = weight(_text_:h in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021587534 = score(doc=1835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.3, S.165-170
  3. Behnert, C.; Plassmeier, K.; Borst, T.; Lewandowski, D.: Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme (2019) 0.02
    0.02205192 = product of:
      0.04410384 = sum of:
        0.04410384 = product of:
          0.066155754 = sum of:
            0.04456822 = weight(_text_:k in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04456822 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
            0.021587534 = weight(_text_:h in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021587534 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 70(2019) H.1, S.14-23
  4. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.02
    0.021491747 = product of:
      0.042983495 = sum of:
        0.042983495 = product of:
          0.06447524 = sum of:
            0.021587534 = weight(_text_:h in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021587534 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
            0.042887706 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042887706 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  5. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.02
    0.021491747 = product of:
      0.042983495 = sum of:
        0.042983495 = product of:
          0.06447524 = sum of:
            0.021587534 = weight(_text_:h in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021587534 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
            0.042887706 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042887706 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.2, S.87-92
  6. Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004) 0.02
    0.018421499 = product of:
      0.036842998 = sum of:
        0.036842998 = product of:
          0.055264495 = sum of:
            0.0185036 = weight(_text_:h in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0185036 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
            0.036760893 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036760893 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 5.2004 19:22:06
  7. Sparck Jones, K.: Search term relevance weighting given little relevance information (1979) 0.02
    0.018008277 = product of:
      0.036016554 = sum of:
        0.036016554 = product of:
          0.10804966 = sum of:
            0.10804966 = weight(_text_:k in 1939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10804966 = score(doc=1939,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.66933334 = fieldWeight in 1939, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1939)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.329-338.
  8. Sparck Jones, K.: ¬A statistical interpretation of term specifity and its application in retrieval (1972) 0.02
    0.016978368 = product of:
      0.033956736 = sum of:
        0.033956736 = product of:
          0.10187021 = sum of:
            0.10187021 = weight(_text_:k in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10187021 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.02
    0.016338175 = product of:
      0.03267635 = sum of:
        0.03267635 = product of:
          0.09802905 = sum of:
            0.09802905 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09802905 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  10. Tsai, C.-F.; Hu, Y.-H.; Chen, Z.-Y.: Factors affecting rocchio-based pseudorelevance feedback in image retrieval (2015) 0.02
    0.01575137 = product of:
      0.03150274 = sum of:
        0.03150274 = product of:
          0.047254108 = sum of:
            0.03183444 = weight(_text_:k in 1607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03183444 = score(doc=1607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1607)
            0.015419668 = weight(_text_:h in 1607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015419668 = score(doc=1607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1607)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Pseudorelevance feedback (PRF) was proposed to solve the limitation of relevance feedback (RF), which is based on the user-in-the-loop process. In PRF, the top-k retrieved images are regarded as PRF. Although the PRF set contains noise, PRF has proven effective for automatically improving the overall retrieval result. To implement PRF, the Rocchio algorithm has been considered as a reasonable and well-established baseline. However, the performance of Rocchio-based PRF is subject to various representation choices (or factors). In this article, we examine these factors that affect the performance of Rocchio-based PRF, including image-feature representation, the number of top-ranked images, the weighting parameters of Rocchio, and similarity measure. We offer practical insights on how to optimize the performance of Rocchio-based PRF by choosing appropriate representation choices. Our extensive experiments on NUS-WIDE-LITE and Caltech 101 + Corel 5000 data sets show that the optimal feature representation is color moment + wavelet texture in terms of retrieval efficiency and effectiveness. Other representation choices are that using top-20 ranked images as pseudopositive and pseudonegative feedback sets with the equal weight (i.e., 0.5) by the correlation and cosine distance functions can produce the optimal retrieval result.
  11. Bhansali, D.; Desai, H.; Deulkar, K.: ¬A study of different ranking approaches for semantic search (2015) 0.02
    0.01575137 = product of:
      0.03150274 = sum of:
        0.03150274 = product of:
          0.047254108 = sum of:
            0.03183444 = weight(_text_:k in 2696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03183444 = score(doc=2696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2696)
            0.015419668 = weight(_text_:h in 2696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015419668 = score(doc=2696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 2696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2696)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Yu, K.; Tresp, V.; Yu, S.: ¬A nonparametric hierarchical Bayesian framework for information filtering (2004) 0.02
    0.015006899 = product of:
      0.030013798 = sum of:
        0.030013798 = product of:
          0.09004139 = sum of:
            0.09004139 = weight(_text_:k in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09004139 = score(doc=4117,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.5577778 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    SIGIR'04: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference an Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Ed.: K. Järvelin, u.a
  13. Niemi, T.; Junkkari, M.; Järvelin, K.; Viita, S.: Advanced query language for manipulating complex entities (2004) 0.01
    0.014856073 = product of:
      0.029712146 = sum of:
        0.029712146 = product of:
          0.08913644 = sum of:
            0.08913644 = weight(_text_:k in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08913644 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Jones, K.: Linguistic searching versus relevance ranking : DR-LINK and TARGET (1999) 0.01
    0.014856073 = product of:
      0.029712146 = sum of:
        0.029712146 = product of:
          0.08913644 = sum of:
            0.08913644 = weight(_text_:k in 6423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08913644 = score(doc=6423,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 6423, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6423)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004) 0.01
    0.014575988 = product of:
      0.029151976 = sum of:
        0.029151976 = product of:
          0.043727964 = sum of:
            0.02228411 = weight(_text_:k in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02228411 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
            0.021443853 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021443853 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
  16. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.01
    0.014295902 = product of:
      0.028591804 = sum of:
        0.028591804 = product of:
          0.08577541 = sum of:
            0.08577541 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08577541 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  17. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.01
    0.014295902 = product of:
      0.028591804 = sum of:
        0.028591804 = product of:
          0.08577541 = sum of:
            0.08577541 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08577541 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  18. Clarke, C.L.A.; Cormack, G.V.; Burkowski, F.J.: Shortest substring ranking : multitext experiments for TREC-4 (1996) 0.01
    0.012733776 = product of:
      0.025467552 = sum of:
        0.025467552 = product of:
          0.07640266 = sum of:
            0.07640266 = weight(_text_:k in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07640266 = score(doc=549,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman
  19. Savoy, J.; Ndarugendamwo, M.; Vrajitoru, D.: Report on the TREC-4 experiment : combining probabilistic and vector-space schemes (1996) 0.01
    0.012733776 = product of:
      0.025467552 = sum of:
        0.025467552 = product of:
          0.07640266 = sum of:
            0.07640266 = weight(_text_:k in 7574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07640266 = score(doc=7574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 7574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7574)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman
  20. Belkin, N.J.; Cool, C.; Koenemann, J.; Ng, K.B.; Park, S.: Using relevance feedback and ranking in interactive searching (1996) 0.01
    0.012733776 = product of:
      0.025467552 = sum of:
        0.025467552 = product of:
          0.07640266 = sum of:
            0.07640266 = weight(_text_:k in 7588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07640266 = score(doc=7588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045220956 = queryNorm
                0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 7588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7588)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman

Languages

  • e 80
  • d 26
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 97
  • m 6
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…