Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.03 
    0.030582255 = product of:
  0.06116451 = sum of:
    0.06116451 = product of:
      0.09174676 = sum of:
        0.042732235 = weight(_text_:h in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042732235 = score(doc=261,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.38035205 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
        0.049014524 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049014524 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch den Bericht in: nfd 53(2002) H.2, S.71
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.7, S.381-392
  2. Grasso, L.L.; Wahlig, H.: Google und seine Suchparameter : Eine Top 20-Precision Analyse anhand repräsentativ ausgewählter Anfragen (2005) 0.01 
    0.0058151204 = product of:
  0.011630241 = sum of:
    0.011630241 = product of:
      0.034890722 = sum of:
        0.034890722 = weight(_text_:h in 3275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034890722 = score(doc=3275,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.31055614 = fieldWeight in 3275, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3275)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.2, S.77-86
  3. Radev, D.R.; Libner, K.; Fan, W.: Getting answers to natural language questions on the Web (2002) 0.01 
    0.00530574 = product of:
  0.01061148 = sum of:
    0.01061148 = product of:
      0.03183444 = sum of:
        0.03183444 = weight(_text_:k in 5204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03183444 = score(doc=5204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 5204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5204)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Languages