-
Wätjen, H.-J.; Diekmann, B.; Möller, G.; Carstensen, K.-U.: Bericht zum DFG-Projekt: GERHARD : German Harvest Automated Retrieval and Directory (1998)
0.03
0.03150274 = product of:
0.06300548 = sum of:
0.06300548 = product of:
0.094508216 = sum of:
0.06366888 = weight(_text_:k in 3065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06366888 = score(doc=3065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 3065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3065)
0.030839335 = weight(_text_:h in 3065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030839335 = score(doc=3065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3065)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009)
0.01
0.01021136 = product of:
0.02042272 = sum of:
0.02042272 = product of:
0.061268155 = sum of:
0.061268155 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061268155 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 12:54:24
-
Lindholm, J.; Schönthal, T.; Jansson , K.: Experiences of harvesting Web resources in engineering using automatic classification (2003)
0.01
0.008489184 = product of:
0.016978368 = sum of:
0.016978368 = product of:
0.050935104 = sum of:
0.050935104 = weight(_text_:k in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050935104 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Yi, K.: Challenges in automated classification using library classification schemes (2006)
0.01
0.008489184 = product of:
0.016978368 = sum of:
0.016978368 = product of:
0.050935104 = sum of:
0.050935104 = weight(_text_:k in 5810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050935104 = score(doc=5810,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 5810, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5810)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Yang, Y.; Liu, X.: ¬A re-examination of text categorization methods (1999)
0.01
0.0074280365 = product of:
0.014856073 = sum of:
0.014856073 = product of:
0.04456822 = sum of:
0.04456822 = weight(_text_:k in 3386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04456822 = score(doc=3386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3386)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reports a controlled study with statistical significance tests an five text categorization methods: the Support Vector Machines (SVM), a k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) classifier, a neural network (NNet) approach, the Linear Leastsquares Fit (LLSF) mapping and a Naive Bayes (NB) classifier. We focus an the robustness of these methods in dealing with a skewed category distribution, and their performance as function of the training-set category frequency. Our results show that SVM, kNN and LLSF significantly outperform NNet and NB when the number of positive training instances per category are small (less than ten, and that all the methods perform comparably when the categories are sufficiently common (over 300 instances).
-
Automatic classification research at OCLC (2002)
0.01
0.007147951 = product of:
0.014295902 = sum of:
0.014295902 = product of:
0.042887706 = sum of:
0.042887706 = weight(_text_:22 in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042887706 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 5.2003 9:22:09
-
Hagedorn, K.; Chapman, S.; Newman, D.: Enhancing search and browse using automated clustering of subject metadata (2007)
0.01
0.006366888 = product of:
0.012733776 = sum of:
0.012733776 = product of:
0.03820133 = sum of:
0.03820133 = weight(_text_:k in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03820133 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Sojka, P.; Lee, M.; Rehurek, R.; Hatlapatka, R.; Kucbel, M.; Bouche, T.; Goutorbe, C.; Anghelache, R.; Wojciechowski, K.: Toolset for entity and semantic associations : Final Release (2013)
0.01
0.006366888 = product of:
0.012733776 = sum of:
0.012733776 = product of:
0.03820133 = sum of:
0.03820133 = weight(_text_:k in 1057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03820133 = score(doc=1057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 1057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1057)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wätjen, H.-J.: Automatisches Sammeln, Klassifizieren und Indexieren von wissenschaftlich relevanten Informationsressourcen im deutschen World Wide Web : das DFG-Projekt GERHARD (1998)
0.01
0.005139889 = product of:
0.010279778 = sum of:
0.010279778 = product of:
0.030839335 = sum of:
0.030839335 = weight(_text_:h in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030839335 = score(doc=3066,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung bibliografischer Titeldatensätze der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie (2009)
0.00
0.004084544 = product of:
0.008169088 = sum of:
0.008169088 = product of:
0.024507262 = sum of:
0.024507262 = weight(_text_:22 in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024507262 = score(doc=3284,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2010 14:41:24
-
Prabowo, R.; Jackson, M.; Burden, P.; Knoell, H.-D.: Ontology-based automatic classification for the Web pages : design, implementation and evaluation (2002)
0.00
0.0030839336 = product of:
0.006167867 = sum of:
0.006167867 = product of:
0.0185036 = sum of:
0.0185036 = weight(_text_:h in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0185036 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Reiner, U.: VZG-Projekt Colibri : Bewertung von automatisch DDC-klassifizierten Titeldatensätzen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB) (2009)
0.00
0.0025699446 = product of:
0.005139889 = sum of:
0.005139889 = product of:
0.015419668 = sum of:
0.015419668 = weight(_text_:h in 2675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015419668 = score(doc=2675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 2675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2675)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Das VZG-Projekt Colibri/DDC beschäftigt sich seit 2003 mit automatischen Verfahren zur Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (Dewey Decimal Classification, kurz DDC). Ziel des Projektes ist eine einheitliche DDC-Erschließung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen und eine Unterstützung der DDC-Expert(inn)en und DDC-Laien, z. B. bei der Analyse und Synthese von DDC-Notationen und deren Qualitätskontrolle und der DDC-basierten Suche. Der vorliegende Bericht konzentriert sich auf die erste größere automatische DDC-Klassifizierung und erste automatische und intellektuelle Bewertung mit der Klassifizierungskomponente vc_dcl1. Grundlage hierfür waren die von der Deutschen Nationabibliothek (DNB) im November 2007 zur Verfügung gestellten 25.653 Titeldatensätze (12 Wochen-/Monatslieferungen) der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie der Reihen A, B und H. Nach Erläuterung der automatischen DDC-Klassifizierung und automatischen Bewertung in Kapitel 2 wird in Kapitel 3 auf den DNB-Bericht "Colibri_Auswertung_DDC_Endbericht_Sommer_2008" eingegangen. Es werden Sachverhalte geklärt und Fragen gestellt, deren Antworten die Weichen für den Verlauf der weiteren Klassifizierungstests stellen werden. Über das Kapitel 3 hinaus führende weitergehende Betrachtungen und Gedanken zur Fortführung der automatischen DDC-Klassifizierung werden in Kapitel 4 angestellt. Der Bericht dient dem vertieften Verständnis für die automatischen Verfahren.
