Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dunsire, G."
  1. Baker, T.; Bermès, E.; Coyle, K.; Dunsire, G.; Isaac, A.; Murray, P.; Panzer, M.; Schneider, J.; Singer, R.; Summers, E.; Waites, W.; Young, J.; Zeng, M.: Library Linked Data Incubator Group Final Report (2011) 0.02
    0.019760583 = product of:
      0.059281744 = sum of:
        0.059281744 = product of:
          0.11856349 = sum of:
            0.11856349 = weight(_text_:group in 4796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11856349 = score(doc=4796,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.54122084 = fieldWeight in 4796, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4796)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The mission of the W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group, chartered from May 2010 through August 2011, has been "to help increase global interoperability of library data on the Web, by bringing together people involved in Semantic Web activities - focusing on Linked Data - in the library community and beyond, building on existing initiatives, and identifying collaboration tracks for the future." In Linked Data [LINKEDDATA], data is expressed using standards such as Resource Description Framework (RDF) [RDF], which specifies relationships between things, and Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs, or "Web addresses") [URI]. This final report of the Incubator Group examines how Semantic Web standards and Linked Data principles can be used to make the valuable information assets that library create and curate - resources such as bibliographic data, authorities, and concept schemes - more visible and re-usable outside of their original library context on the wider Web. The Incubator Group began by eliciting reports on relevant activities from parties ranging from small, independent projects to national library initiatives (see the separate report, Library Linked Data Incubator Group: Use Cases) [USECASE]. These use cases provided the starting point for the work summarized in the report: an analysis of the benefits of library Linked Data, a discussion of current issues with regard to traditional library data, existing library Linked Data initiatives, and legal rights over library data; and recommendations for next steps. The report also summarizes the results of a survey of current Linked Data technologies and an inventory of library Linked Data resources available today (see also the more detailed report, Library Linked Data Incubator Group: Datasets, Value Vocabularies, and Metadata Element Sets) [VOCABDATASET].
    Issue
    W3C Incubator Group Report 25 October 2011.
  2. Dunsire, G.; Willer, M.: Initiatives to make standard library metadata models and structures available to the Semantic Web (2010) 0.01
    0.012936337 = product of:
      0.03880901 = sum of:
        0.03880901 = product of:
          0.07761802 = sum of:
            0.07761802 = weight(_text_:group in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07761802 = score(doc=3965,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.3543122 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes recent initiatives to make standard library metadata models and structures available to the Semantic Web, including IFLA standards such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD), and International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD) along with the infrastructure that supports them. The FRBR Review Group is currently developing representations of FRAD and the entityrelationship model of FRBR in resource description framework (RDF) applications, using a combination of RDF, RDF Schema (RDFS), Simple Knowledge Organisation System (SKOS) and Web Ontology Language (OWL), cross-relating both models where appropriate. The ISBD/XML Task Group is investigating the representation of ISBD in RDF. The IFLA Namespaces project is developing an administrative and technical infrastructure to support such initiatives and encourage uptake of standards by other agencies. The paper describes similar initiatives with related external standards such as RDA - resource description and access, REICAT (the new Italian cataloguing rules) and CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM). The DCMI RDA Task Group is working with the Joint Steering Committee for RDA to develop Semantic Web representations of RDA structural elements, which are aligned with FRBR and FRAD, and controlled metadata content vocabularies. REICAT is also based on FRBR, and an object-oriented version of FRBR has been integrated with CRM, which itself has an RDF representation. CRM was initially based on the metadata needs of the museum community, and is now seeking extension to the archives community with the eventual aim of developing a model common to the main cultural information domains of archives, libraries and museums. The Vocabulary Mapping Framework (VMF) project has developed a Semantic Web tool to automatically generate mappings between metadata models from the information communities, including publishers. The tool is based on several standards, including CRM, FRAD, FRBR, MARC21 and RDA.
  3. Dunsire, G.: Solidarity with good support (1996) 0.01
    0.011203195 = product of:
      0.033609584 = sum of:
        0.033609584 = product of:
          0.06721917 = sum of:
            0.06721917 = weight(_text_:group in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06721917 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.30684334 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents an overview of cataloguing and indexing activities taking place in Scotland. Outlines the background to the current cataloguing scene by describing the work of SCOLCAP (Scottish Libraries Cooperative Automation Project) during the 970s and 1980s, and the activities of the Library's Association's Cataloguing and Indexing Group in Scotland, founded in 983. Scotland now dhas a well established infrastructure of professional information organizations including the Scottish Confederation of University and Research Libraries and the Scottish Library and Information Council. Describes 4 current cataloguing and indexing projects: SALSER (Scottish Academic Serials); CATRIONA (Cataloguing and Retrieval of Information Over Network Access); SLAINTE (Scottish Libraries across the Internet); and BOSLIT (Bibliography of Scottish Literature in Translation). Proposes 3 important future developments: a distributed catalogue of research and educational materials held in the libraries of Scotland; an effective mechanism for the storage and preservation of electronic information objects of national significance; and a standard, integrated catalogue or index of all local history resources
  4. Dunsire, G.: Interoperability and semantics in RDF representations of FRBR, FRAD and FRSAD (2011) 0.01
    0.009335997 = product of:
      0.028007988 = sum of:
        0.028007988 = product of:
          0.056015976 = sum of:
            0.056015976 = weight(_text_:group in 651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056015976 = score(doc=651,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 651, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes recent work on registering Resource Description Framework (RDF) versions of the entities and relationships from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) models developed by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). FRBR was developed several years before FRAD, and is under-developed in areas which FRAD was expected to cover; FRAD therefore makes significance reference to FRBR. Similarly, FRAD leaves a full treatment of subject authority data to the ongoing development of Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) which was finalised during 2010. Although the FRBR Review Group is charged with consolidating all three models in due course, the RDF versions of FRBR, FRAD, and FRSAD are being created in separate namespaces, with a separate Web Ontology Language (OWL) ontology to connect the three models. The paper discusses interoperability issues arising from this work. Such issues include class definitions and sub-classes, reciprocal properties, and disjoint classes and properties. The paper discusses similar work on the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), also maintained by IFLA, and related issues arising from the RDF representation of the metadata element set of RDA: resource description and access, which is based on the FRBR and FRAD models. The work is ongoing, and the paper updates the original conference presentation to the end of October 2010.
  5. Dunsire, G.; Nicholson, D.: Signposting the crossroads : terminology Web services and classification-based interoperability (2010) 0.01
    0.005343549 = product of:
      0.016030647 = sum of:
        0.016030647 = product of:
          0.032061294 = sum of:
            0.032061294 = weight(_text_:22 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032061294 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2011 19:22:48