-
Egghe, L.; Ravichandra Rao, I.K.: Study of different h-indices for groups of authors (2008)
0.02
0.015843712 = product of:
0.04753113 = sum of:
0.04753113 = product of:
0.09506226 = sum of:
0.09506226 = weight(_text_:group in 1878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09506226 = score(doc=1878,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.43394202 = fieldWeight in 1878, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1878)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this article, for any group of authors, we define three different h-indices. First, there is the successive h-index h2 based on the ranked list of authors and their h-indices h1 as defined by Schubert (2007). Next, there is the h-index hP based on the ranked list of authors and their number of publications. Finally, there is the h-index hC based on the ranked list of authors and their number of citations. We present formulae for these three indices in Lotkaian informetrics from which it also follows that h2 < hp < hc. We give a concrete example of a group of 167 authors on the topic optical flow estimation. Besides these three h-indices, we also calculate the two-by-two Spearman rank correlation coefficient and prove that these rankings are significantly related.
-
Egghe, L.: Dynamic h-index : the Hirsch index in function of time (2007)
0.01
0.014937594 = product of:
0.04481278 = sum of:
0.04481278 = product of:
0.08962556 = sum of:
0.08962556 = weight(_text_:group in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08962556 = score(doc=147,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.40912446 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- When there are a group of articles and the present time is fixed we can determine the unique number h being the number of articles that received h or more citations while the other articles received a number of citations which is not larger than h. In this article, the time dependence of the h-index is determined. This is important to describe the expected career evolution of a scientist's work or of a journal's production in a fixed year.
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Rousseau, S.: TOP-curves (2007)
0.01
0.013070395 = product of:
0.039211184 = sum of:
0.039211184 = product of:
0.07842237 = sum of:
0.07842237 = weight(_text_:group in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07842237 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.35798392 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Several characteristics of classical Lorenz curves make them unsuitable for the study of a group of topperformers. TOP-curves, defined as a kind of mirror image of TIP-curves used in poverty studies, are shown to possess the properties necessary for adequate empirical ranking of various data arrays, based on the properties of the highest performers (i.e., the core). TOP-curves and essential TOP-curves, also introduced in this article, simultaneously represent the incidence, intensity, and inequality among the top. It is shown that TOPdominance partial order, introduced in this article, is stronger than Lorenz dominance order. In this way, this article contributes to the study of cores, a central issue in applied informetrics.
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.01
0.010687098 = product of:
0.032061294 = sum of:
0.032061294 = product of:
0.06412259 = sum of:
0.06412259 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06412259 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.01
0.0064122584 = product of:
0.019236775 = sum of:
0.019236775 = product of:
0.03847355 = sum of:
0.03847355 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03847355 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Egghe, L.: ¬A universal method of information retrieval evaluation : the "missing" link M and the universal IR surface (2004)
0.01
0.0064122584 = product of:
0.019236775 = sum of:
0.019236775 = product of:
0.03847355 = sum of:
0.03847355 = weight(_text_:22 in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03847355 = score(doc=2558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 14. 8.2004 19:17:22
