Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"dk"
  1. Madsen, M.; Strunck, K.: Bibliografiske posters funktionaliatet : funktionaliatet som mal for kvalitet og kvantitet i bibliografiske data (1997) 0.01 
    0.013070395 = product of:
  0.039211184 = sum of:
    0.039211184 = product of:
      0.07842237 = sum of:
        0.07842237 = weight(_text_:group in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07842237 = score(doc=689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.35798392 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The 1992 IFLA Study Group issued its report functional requirements for bibliographic records in mid 96. The investigation's method was based on the entity/relation analysis technique. The 1st step in this model is identification of entities, and for each entity a set of attributes. Finally the relations between the entities are analyzed, and evaluation of the relevance of attributes and relations connected with user tasks is carried out. With these analyses the report recommended basic functional requirements for national bibliographic records. The matrix of attributes, relations and user tasks provides a useful tool for determining the cataloguing level
  2. Buch, L.: Teknikken vinder over intellektet : eller hvordan man myrded formidleren i dansk forskningsbiblioteksvaesen (1993) 0.01 
    0.011203195 = product of:
  0.033609584 = sum of:
    0.033609584 = product of:
      0.06721917 = sum of:
        0.06721917 = weight(_text_:group in 7329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06721917 = score(doc=7329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.30684334 = fieldWeight in 7329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7329)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Comments on Statens Bibliotekstjeneste's 1993 report on subject data in research libraries. Despite the failure in the 70s to create a common classification system using notation, the report recommends just such a system but using verbal expressions. It assumes that subject indexing problems can be solved by reusing other libraries' key words and that user groups are homogeneous and able to use the systems thus leaving libraries as professionals intermediaries without responsibility. Uses the experiences of the author's library, the Environmental Library, which itself indexes all material, and gives 6 examples of how other institutions index the same publications differently, to show that the simple recycling system which the report recommends cannot be used there. Rather than spend recources on developing electronic catalogues, as the report recommends, funds should be used to help research libraries construct systems targeting their specific user group

Authors