-
Shieh, J.: PCC's work on URIs in MARC (2020)
0.03
0.025872674 = product of:
0.07761802 = sum of:
0.07761802 = product of:
0.15523604 = sum of:
0.15523604 = weight(_text_:group in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15523604 = score(doc=122,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.7086244 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In 2015, the PCC Task Group on URIs in MARC was tasked to identify and address linked data identifiers deployment in the current MARC format. By way of a pilot test, a survey, MARC Discussion papers, Proposals, etc., the Task Group initiated and introduced changes to MARC encoding. The Task Group succeeded in laying the ground work for preparing library data transition from MARC data to a linked data, RDF environment.
-
Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996)
0.02
0.02240639 = product of:
0.06721917 = sum of:
0.06721917 = product of:
0.13443834 = sum of:
0.13443834 = weight(_text_:group in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13443834 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.6136867 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Functional requirements for bibliographic records : Final report (1998)
0.02
0.018671993 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = product of:
0.11203195 = sum of:
0.11203195 = weight(_text_:group in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11203195 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.5114056 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Editor
- IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
-
UNIMARC / Authorities : Universal format for authorities. Recommended by the IFLA Steering Group on a UNIMARC format for authorities (1991)
0.02
0.018671993 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = product of:
0.11203195 = sum of:
0.11203195 = weight(_text_:group in 7548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11203195 = score(doc=7548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.5114056 = fieldWeight in 7548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Graham, C.; Johnston, J.: Format integration and serials cataloging (1997)
0.02
0.018671993 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = product of:
0.11203195 = sum of:
0.11203195 = weight(_text_:group in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11203195 = score(doc=663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.5114056 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Report of a workshop held at the North American Serials Interest Group, Inc., 11th annual conference, 20-23 Jun 96
-
Funktionelle Anforderungen an bibliografische Datensätze : Abschlussbericht der IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (2006)
0.02
0.018671993 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = product of:
0.11203195 = sum of:
0.11203195 = weight(_text_:group in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11203195 = score(doc=2263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.5114056 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.02
0.01813661 = product of:
0.054409824 = sum of:
0.054409824 = product of:
0.10881965 = sum of:
0.10881965 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10881965 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.017099358 = product of:
0.05129807 = sum of:
0.05129807 = product of:
0.10259614 = sum of:
0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10259614 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.01
0.014961937 = product of:
0.04488581 = sum of:
0.04488581 = product of:
0.08977162 = sum of:
0.08977162 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08977162 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000)
0.01
0.014961937 = product of:
0.04488581 = sum of:
0.04488581 = product of:
0.08977162 = sum of:
0.08977162 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08977162 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 26. 8.2000 19:22:35
-
Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001)
0.01
0.014961937 = product of:
0.04488581 = sum of:
0.04488581 = product of:
0.08977162 = sum of:
0.08977162 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08977162 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.01
0.014961937 = product of:
0.04488581 = sum of:
0.04488581 = product of:
0.08977162 = sum of:
0.08977162 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08977162 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Eliot, J.: MARC and OPAC systems : discussion document (1994)
0.01
0.014937594 = product of:
0.04481278 = sum of:
0.04481278 = product of:
0.08962556 = sum of:
0.08962556 = weight(_text_:group in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08962556 = score(doc=10,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.40912446 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A discussion document produced following a meeting the Users of Book Industry Standards (UBIS) Bibliographic Standards Working Group at the University of London as part of a project to consider the Survey on the use of UK-MARC by Russell Sweeney published in 1991 by the British Library National Bibliographic Service. Considers the suitability, or otherwise, of the UKMARC format for use in OPACs. Summarizes the issues involved, discussing: the UKMARC exchange format, tagging and coding structure (record complexity, analytical entries, non filing indicators), data content (statements of responsibility, main versus added entry) and records standards
-
Postlkethwaite, B.: LITA MARC Holdings Interest Group, American Library Association Conference, new Orleans, June 1993 (1994)
0.01
0.014937594 = product of:
0.04481278 = sum of:
0.04481278 = product of:
0.08962556 = sum of:
0.08962556 = weight(_text_:group in 859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08962556 = score(doc=859,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.40912446 = fieldWeight in 859, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=859)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Parent, I.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : an Anglo-American perspective (1995)
0.01
0.014937594 = product of:
0.04481278 = sum of:
0.04481278 = product of:
0.08962556 = sum of:
0.08962556 = weight(_text_:group in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08962556 = score(doc=3080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.40912446 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Presents a view on the work of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Study Group on behalf of the Anglo-American cataloguing tradition. The study is examining the fundamental aspects of record design using the entity-attribute-relationship model to link data elements to the function that a user can perform while accessing a bibliographic record. The data and functions are being linked by UNIMARC fields
-
Williams, R.D.: MARC: thirty years and still going ... (1995)
0.01
0.014937594 = product of:
0.04481278 = sum of:
0.04481278 = product of:
0.08962556 = sum of:
0.08962556 = weight(_text_:group in 4020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08962556 = score(doc=4020,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.40912446 = fieldWeight in 4020, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4020)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Traces the history of the MARC formats, for computerized bibliographic records and computerized cataloguing, from the initial work of the Library of Congress in the early 60s through to the various stages of development of the MARC Pilot Project (1966 to 1968); MARC2 (1968 to 1974); Distribution Service (1968); Retrospective Conversion (1968 to 1970); the Committee on Representation in Machine-Readable Form of Bibliographic Information (MARBI) and the USMARC Advisory Group; and the expansion, linkage and integration stages (1980 to the present)
-
Duncan, D.: IFLA Core Programme for Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC (UBCIM) and Division of Bibliographic Control reports on activities 1994-1995 : Section on Classification and Indexing (1996)
0.01
0.014937594 = product of:
0.04481278 = sum of:
0.04481278 = product of:
0.08962556 = sum of:
0.08962556 = weight(_text_:group in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08962556 = score(doc=4927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.40912446 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the work of the Section on Classification and Indexing, covering the working group on principles underlying subject heading languages; a state of the art survey of subject heading systems; requirements for a format for classification data; DDC edition 20; open programs at the Istanbul conference; the section newsletter; and cooperative projects
-
¬The core bibliographic record for music and sound recordings (1998)
0.01
0.014937594 = product of:
0.04481278 = sum of:
0.04481278 = product of:
0.08962556 = sum of:
0.08962556 = weight(_text_:group in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08962556 = score(doc=3801,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.40912446 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the background to the creation of a core bibliographic record for music and sound recordings, provides a definition of a core bibliographic record and presents the core record for printed and manuscript music and the core record for sound recordings which were prepared by the International Association of Music Libraries, Archives and Documentation Centres Working Group in Perugia, 1-6 Sep 1996
-
Duclos-Faure, D.: Format d'echange des donnees locales : ou en sommes-nous? (1997)
0.01
0.013070395 = product of:
0.039211184 = sum of:
0.039211184 = product of:
0.07842237 = sum of:
0.07842237 = weight(_text_:group in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07842237 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.35798392 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Since Sep 1996 a group with representatives from the French National Library (BNF), French Joint Catalogue (CCF), Directorate of Scientific and Technical Information (DISTNB), Directorate of Reading (DL) and the Higher Education Bibliography Agency (ABES) has been working on establishing a format for exchanging local data which will accomodtae the needs of all users; conform to international standards and take account of new technological tools (Z39.50-1995). Using pre-existing formats with UNIMARC as the basis, the new format will allow selection of documents by different location criteria, establish conditions of communication and manage interlibrary loan. To date fields have been defined for data on location and management of copies, and for descriptive data on copies
-
Oehlschläger, S.: Projekt Mapping ISBDs to FRBR (2004)
0.01
0.012936337 = product of:
0.03880901 = sum of:
0.03880901 = product of:
0.07761802 = sum of:
0.07761802 = weight(_text_:group in 2791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07761802 = score(doc=2791,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.3543122 = fieldWeight in 2791, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2791)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Die Deutsche Bibliothek und die British Library fördern gemeinsam das Projekt »Mapping ISBDs to FRBR«. Beide Bibliotheken unterstützen damit die strategischen Ziele der IFLA-CDNL Allianz für bibliografische Standards. Die Deutsche Bibliothek ist innerhalb der Allianz verantwortlich für die Unterstützung der Pflege und Weiterentwicklung der ISBD, während die British Library für die Unterstützung von Pflege und Entwicklung der Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) zuständig ist. Für die Durchführung des Projekts konnte Tom Delsey gewonnen werden, der früher in der National Library of Canada beschäftigt war. Tom Delsey ist federführender Autor der FRBR und hat Beiträge zu vielen verschiedenen Aspekten der International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions (ISBDs) geliefert. Eine der größten Errungenschaften der IFLA auf dem Gebiet der bibliografischen Kontrolle ist die Schaffung von weit verbreiteten Regeln, die ihren Niederschlag in den verschiedenen Ausgaben der ISBDs und in dem anerkannten Modell der FRBR gefunden haben, welches auf der Basis der ISBDs, GARE (Guidelines for Authority and Reference entries) und GSARE (Guidelines for Subject Authority and Reference entries) entwickelt wurde. Für die Akzeptanz der IFLA-Arbeit in diesen Bereichen ist es äußerst wichtig, dass die ISBDs und die FRBR sich aufeinander beziehen und sich gegenseitig unterstützen, um für den Anwender eine Konsistenz zwischen beiden zu gewährleisten. Aus diesem Grund hat die ISBD Review Group Überlegungen zur Angleichung der in den ISBDs benutzten Terminologie mit der der FRBR angestellt. Beim Versuch einer Terminologieangleichung ist die Gruppe jedoch auf Schwierigkeiten gestoßen, die zum Großteil darin begründet sind, dass die Begriffe, die in den FRBR benutzt werden, im Kontext eines »Entity-Relationship«-Modells definiert wurden, das von einer höheren Abstraktionsebene ausgeht als die Beschreibungen für die ISBDs. Während die Entitäten, die im FRBR-Modell definiert sind, sich einerseits klar auf die Elemente beziehen, die eine ISBD-Beschreibung bilden, sind diese andererseits nicht zwingend in jeder Hinsicht deckungsgleich. Insgesamt sind die Beziehungen zu vielschichtig, um durch einen einfachen Austausch der Terminologie dargestellt werden zu können. Deshalb haben die ISBD Review Group und die FRBR Review Group der IFLA beschlossen, dass ein anderer Weg der Annäherung verfolgt werden soll, um die Beziehungen zwischen den ISBDs und dem FRBR-Modell darzustellen. Es soll eine Tabelle entwickelt werden, die die Beziehungen jedes Elements, das in den ISBDs spezifiziert ist, dem korrespondierenden Entitätenattribut oder der Beziehung zuweist, wie sie im FRBR-Modell definiert ist. Diese Tabelle soll zeigen, dass die ISBDs und die FRBR miteinander in einer harmonischen Beziehung stehen. Zusätzlich soll sie die Abbildung der FRBR in den ISBDs (und anderen Standards) vervollständigen, die im Appendix A des FRBR Final Report dargestellt ist. Diese Abbildung würde es beiden Review Groups auch ermöglichen sicherzustellen, dass es kein Element in den ISBDs gibt, das nicht in den FRBR repräsentiert ist, und Änderungen in die Wege zu leiten, die notwendig sind, um zu einer größeren Konsistenz der beiden zu gelangen.
