-
Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996)
0.02
0.02240639 = product of:
0.06721917 = sum of:
0.06721917 = product of:
0.13443834 = sum of:
0.13443834 = weight(_text_:group in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13443834 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.6136867 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Svensson, L.G.: Integrating browsing over DDC notations in library portals (2007)
0.02
0.02240639 = product of:
0.06721917 = sum of:
0.06721917 = product of:
0.13443834 = sum of:
0.13443834 = weight(_text_:group in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13443834 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.6136867 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vortrag während der EDUG-Konferenz der European DDC users' group am 11.06.2007 in Bern.
-
Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984)
0.02
0.017099358 = product of:
0.05129807 = sum of:
0.05129807 = product of:
0.10259614 = sum of:
0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10259614 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
-
Wyly, B.: What lies ahead for classification in information networks? : report of a panel discussion (1995)
0.02
0.016170422 = product of:
0.048511263 = sum of:
0.048511263 = product of:
0.097022526 = sum of:
0.097022526 = weight(_text_:group in 5568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097022526 = score(doc=5568,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.44289026 = fieldWeight in 5568, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5568)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Ia McIlwaine, head of the Classification Research Group and editor of the UDC, noticed that the session's title invited crystal ball gazing, a talent she denied possessing. However, she admitted that she had asked the Classification Research Group to engage in such an exercise with her. The Group found, like the participants at the Allerton Institute were finding, that the contemplation of classification's future provided more questions than answers, but the questions were well worth considering. Her talk focused around a problem which originates in the difference between classifiers' uses and users' uses for classification systems. For users, who speak with the paraphrased self-confidence of Humpty Dumpty, a subject is a subject because they say it is. McIlwaine pointed out that this process of "saying" is at the heart of the users' needs which should be addressed by classification systems. Users use words to approach information systems and their associated classification systems. Classifiers need to recognize that this is the use to which their systems will be put. A body of users external to the classification process will make very different demands upon the system as compared to the users of the classification system who are also the creators of the system. Users desire information grouped for individual usefulness, and the groupings need to be according to words through which users can approach the system.
-
LaBarre, K.: ¬A multi faceted view : use of facet analysis in the practice of website organization and access (2006)
0.01
0.013203094 = product of:
0.03960928 = sum of:
0.03960928 = product of:
0.07921856 = sum of:
0.07921856 = weight(_text_:group in 257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07921856 = score(doc=257,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.36161837 = fieldWeight in 257, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=257)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In 2001, information architects and knowledge management specialists charged with designing websites and access to corporate knowledge bases seemingly re-discovered a legacy form of information organization and access: faceted analytico-synthetic theory (FAST). Instrumental in creating new and different ways for people to engage with the digital content of the Web, the members of this group have clearly recognized that faceted approaches have the potential to improve access to information on the web. Some of these practitioners explicitly use the forms and language of FAST, while others seem to mimic the forms implicitly (Adkisson, 2003). The focus of this ongoing research study is two-fold. First, access and organizational structures in a stratified random sample of 200 DMOZ websites were examined for evidence of the use of FAST. Second, in the context of unstructured interviews, the understanding and use of FAST among a group of eighteen practitioners is uncovered. This is a preliminary report of the website component capture and interview phases of this research study. Future work will involve formalizing a set of feature guidelines drawn from the initial phases of this research study. Preliminary observations will be drawn from the first phase of this study.
-
High, W.H.: Library of Congress Classification numbers as subject access points in computer-based retrieval (1990)
0.01
0.013070395 = product of:
0.039211184 = sum of:
0.039211184 = product of:
0.07842237 = sum of:
0.07842237 = weight(_text_:group in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07842237 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.35798392 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Subject retrieval by Library of Congress (LC) Classification numbers is examined from the perspective of 5 user groups of on-line catalogues. Although, at present, librarians are the user group most likely to benefit from the LC classification advances in the capabilities of on-line catalogues. Research on the use of the LC classification schedules as a component of subject retrieval should continue.
-
LaBarre, K.: Adventures in faceted classification: a brave new world or a world of confusion? (2004)
0.01
0.013070395 = product of:
0.039211184 = sum of:
0.039211184 = product of:
0.07842237 = sum of:
0.07842237 = weight(_text_:group in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07842237 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.35798392 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A preliminary, purposive survey of definitions and current applications of facet analytical theory (FA) is used to develop a framework for the analysis of Websites. This set of guidelines may well serve to highlight commonalities and differences among FA applications an the Web. Rather than identifying FA as the terrain of a particular interest group, the goal is to explore current practices, uncover common misconceptions, extend understanding, and highlight developments that augment the traditional practice of FA and faceted classification (FC).
-
Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000)
0.01
0.012824517 = product of:
0.03847355 = sum of:
0.03847355 = product of:
0.0769471 = sum of:
0.0769471 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0769471 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:47
-
National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001)
0.01
0.011743637 = product of:
0.03523091 = sum of:
0.03523091 = sum of:
0.02240639 = weight(_text_:group in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02240639 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.102281116 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.012824518 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012824518 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 2. 1.2004 10:35:22
- Footnote
- SELVI (Knowledge Classification of Digital Information Materials with Special Reference to Clustering Technique) finds that it is essential to classify digital material since the amount of material that is becoming available is growing. Selvi suggests using automated classification to "group together those digital information materials or documents that are "most similar" (p. 65). This can be attained by using Cluster analysis methods. PRADHAN and THULASI (A Study of the Use of Classification and Indexing Systems by Web Resource Directories) compare and contrast the classificatory structures of Google, Yahoo, and Looksmart's directories and compare the directories to Dewey Decimal Classification, Library of Congress Classification and Colon Classification's classificatory structures. They find differentes between the directories' and the bibliographic classification systems' classificatory structures and principles. These differentes stem from the fact that bibliographic classification systems are used to "classify academic resources for the research community" (p. 83) and directories "aim to categorize a wider breath of information groups, entertainment, recreation, govt. information, commercial information" (p. 83). NEELAMEGHAN (Hierarchy, Hierarchical Relation and Hierarchical Arrangement) reviews the concept of hierarchy and the formation of hierarchical structures across a variety of domains. NEELAMEGHAN and PRADAD (Digitized Schemes for Subject Classification and Thesauri: Complementary Roles) demonstrate how thesaural relationships (NT, BT, and RT) can be applied to a classification scheme, the Colon Classification in this Gase. NEELAMEGHAN and ASUNDI (Metadata Framework for Describing Embodied Knowledge and Subject Content) propose to use the Generalized Facet Structure framework which is based an Ranganathan's General Theory of Knowledge Classification as a framework for describing the content of documents in a metadata element set for the representation of web documents. CHUDAMANI (Classified Catalogue as a Tool for Subject Based Information Retrieval in both Traditional and Electronic Library Environment) explains why the classified catalogue is superior to the alphabetic cata logue and argues that the same is true in the digital environment.
-
Spiteri, L.: ¬A simplified model for facet analysis : Ranganathan 101 (1998)
0.01
0.011203195 = product of:
0.033609584 = sum of:
0.033609584 = product of:
0.06721917 = sum of:
0.06721917 = weight(_text_:group in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06721917 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.30684334 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Ranganathan's canons, principles, and postulates can easily confuse readers, especially because he revised and added to them in various editions of his many books. The Classification Research Group, who drew on Ranganathan's work as their basis for classification theory but developed it in their own way, has never clearly organized all their equivalent canons and principles. In this article Spiteri gathers the fundamental rules from both systems and compares and contrasts them. She makes her own clearer set of principles for constructing facets, stating the subject of a document, and designing notation. Spiteri's "simplified model" is clear and understandable, but certainly not simplistic. The model does not include methods for making a faceted system, but will serve as a very useful guide in how to turn initial work into a rigorous classification. Highly recommended
-
Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990)
0.01
0.010687098 = product of:
0.032061294 = sum of:
0.032061294 = product of:
0.06412259 = sum of:
0.06412259 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06412259 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 12:22:40
-
Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009)
0.01
0.010687098 = product of:
0.032061294 = sum of:
0.032061294 = product of:
0.06412259 = sum of:
0.06412259 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06412259 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 12:54:24
-
Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cuncliffe, D.: Representation and retrieval in faceted systems (2003)
0.01
0.009335997 = product of:
0.028007988 = sum of:
0.028007988 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = weight(_text_:group in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056015976 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses two inter-related themes: the retrieval potential of faceted thesauri and XML representations of fundamental facets. Initial findings are discussed from the ongoing 'FACET' project, in collaboration with the National Museum of Science and Industry. The work discussed seeks to take advantage of the structure afforded by faceted systems for multi-term queries and flexible matching, focusing in this paper an the Art and Architecture Thesaurus. A multi-term matching function yields ranked results with partial matches via semantic term expansion, based an a measure of distance over the semantic index space formed by thesaurus relationships. Our intention is to drive the system from general representations and a common query structure and interface. To this end, we are developing an XML representation based an work by the Classification Research Group an fundamental facets or categories. The XML representation maps categories to particular thesauri and hierarchies. The system interface, which is configured by the mapping, incorporates a thesaurus browser with navigation history together with a term search facility and drag and drop query builder.
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001)
0.01
0.009335997 = product of:
0.028007988 = sum of:
0.028007988 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = weight(_text_:group in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056015976 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Broughton is one of the key people working on the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2). Her article has a brief, informative history of facets, then discusses semantic vs. syntactic relationships, standard facets used by Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, facet analysis and citation order, and how to build subject indexes out of faceted classifications, all with occasional reference to digital environments and hypertext, but never with any specifics. It concludes by saying of faceted classification that the "capacity which it has to create highly sophisticated structures for the accommodation of complex objects suggests that it is worth investigation as an organizational tool for digital materials, and that the results of such investigation would be knowledge structures of unparalleled utility and elegance." How to build them is left to the reader, but this article provides an excellent starting point. It includes an example that shows how general concepts can be applied to a small set of documents and subjects, and how terms can be adapted to suit the material and users
-
LaBarre, K.; Cochrane, P.A.: Facet analysis as a knowledge management tool on the Internet (2006)
0.01
0.009335997 = product of:
0.028007988 = sum of:
0.028007988 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = weight(_text_:group in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056015976 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In 2001, a group of information architects involved in designing websites, and knowledge management specialists involved in creating access to corporate knowledge bases appeared to have re-discovered facet analysis and faceted classification. These groups have been instrumental in creating new and different ways of handling digital content of the Internet. Some of these practitioners explicitly use the forms and language of facet analysis and faceted classification, while others seem to do so implicitly. Following a brief overview of the work and discussions on facets and faceted classification in recent years, we focus on our observations about new information resources which seem more in line with the Fourth law of Library Science ("Save the time of the reader") than most library OPACs today. These new developments on the Internet point to a partial grasp of a disciplined approach to subject access. This is where Ranganathan and Neelameghan's approach needs to be reviewed for the new audience of information system designers. A report on the work undertaken by us forms a principal part of this paper.
-
Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010)
0.01
0.009068305 = product of:
0.027204912 = sum of:
0.027204912 = product of:
0.054409824 = sum of:
0.054409824 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054409824 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
- Date
- 22. 1.2010 15:06:54
-
Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003)
0.01
0.008549679 = product of:
0.025649035 = sum of:
0.025649035 = product of:
0.05129807 = sum of:
0.05129807 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05129807 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 30. 7.2004 12:22:52
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.01
0.008549679 = product of:
0.025649035 = sum of:
0.025649035 = product of:
0.05129807 = sum of:
0.05129807 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05129807 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
-
Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003)
0.01
0.008549679 = product of:
0.025649035 = sum of:
0.025649035 = product of:
0.05129807 = sum of:
0.05129807 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05129807 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
-
Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989)
0.01
0.0074809687 = product of:
0.022442905 = sum of:
0.022442905 = product of:
0.04488581 = sum of:
0.04488581 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04488581 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 8.11.1995 11:52:22
