Search (35 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  1. Bawden, D.: Browsing : theory and practice (1993) 0.07
    0.07032649 = product of:
      0.21097946 = sum of:
        0.21097946 = weight(_text_:analogies in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21097946 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38810563 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.5436135 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a selective literature review covering the process of browsing as a means of searching for information. References are selected in order to illustrate the major themes and to bring out points which have not been emphasised before. The main points covered in the review include: consideration of browsing as an important, but under rated and little understood, form of information access; the ability in browsing to find analogies, connections, and new lines of thought; the potential of browsings as an ideal technique for accasional or non expert users; the ability to apply browsing to both paper based and computerized information retrieval; and the ability to search for information in a semi-random fashion leading to serendipitous linkage. Concludes that, despite the acknowledges importance of browsing, the increased effort being expended in making computerized systems browsable and the many references to the concept in the computer literature, there is still a lack of real understanding of the basic concepts of the process
  2. Bibliography of papers on classification and allied subjects (1956) 0.03
    0.029875187 = product of:
      0.08962556 = sum of:
        0.08962556 = product of:
          0.17925112 = sum of:
            0.17925112 = weight(_text_:group in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17925112 = score(doc=294,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.8182489 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Editor
    Classification Research Group
  3. Looking for information : a survey on research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2012) 0.02
    0.018671993 = product of:
      0.056015976 = sum of:
        0.056015976 = product of:
          0.11203195 = sum of:
            0.11203195 = weight(_text_:group in 3802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11203195 = score(doc=3802,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.5114056 = fieldWeight in 3802, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3802)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Bingley, UK : Emerald Group Publishing Limited
  4. Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008) 0.02
    0.017099358 = product of:
      0.05129807 = sum of:
        0.05129807 = product of:
          0.10259614 = sum of:
            0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10259614 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:01:26
  5. Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008) 0.02
    0.017099358 = product of:
      0.05129807 = sum of:
        0.05129807 = product of:
          0.10259614 = sum of:
            0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10259614 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 9:30:22
  6. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.02
    0.017099358 = product of:
      0.05129807 = sum of:
        0.05129807 = product of:
          0.10259614 = sum of:
            0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10259614 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
  7. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.017099358 = product of:
      0.05129807 = sum of:
        0.05129807 = product of:
          0.10259614 = sum of:
            0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10259614 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  8. Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996) 0.02
    0.017099358 = product of:
      0.05129807 = sum of:
        0.05129807 = product of:
          0.10259614 = sum of:
            0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10259614 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17.10.1996 14:22:33
  9. Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987) 0.02
    0.017099358 = product of:
      0.05129807 = sum of:
        0.05129807 = product of:
          0.10259614 = sum of:
            0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10259614 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
  10. Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987) 0.02
    0.017099358 = product of:
      0.05129807 = sum of:
        0.05129807 = product of:
          0.10259614 = sum of:
            0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10259614 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
  11. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.02
    0.017099358 = product of:
      0.05129807 = sum of:
        0.05129807 = product of:
          0.10259614 = sum of:
            0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10259614 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  12. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.01
    0.014961937 = product of:
      0.04488581 = sum of:
        0.04488581 = product of:
          0.08977162 = sum of:
            0.08977162 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08977162 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
  13. Kerslake, E.; Kinnel, M.: ¬The social impact of public libraries : a literatur review (1997) 0.01
    0.014937594 = product of:
      0.04481278 = sum of:
        0.04481278 = product of:
          0.08962556 = sum of:
            0.08962556 = weight(_text_:group in 2985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08962556 = score(doc=2985,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.40912446 = fieldWeight in 2985, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2985)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the social impact of public libraries, commissioned by the Community Development Foundation and the Community Services Group of the Library Association. Concludes that the impact of public libraries may be seen at 2 levels: their more immediate impact on the economy, the level of skills in the labour market place and society and their role in community development and sustenance; and the extension of social inclusiveness and citizenship, with cumulative results in these areas of activity
  14. Sugar, W.: User-centered perspective of information retrieval research and analysis methods (1995) 0.01
    0.011203195 = product of:
      0.033609584 = sum of:
        0.033609584 = product of:
          0.06721917 = sum of:
            0.06721917 = weight(_text_:group in 4487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06721917 = score(doc=4487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.30684334 = fieldWeight in 4487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a state of the art review of the underlying theories of and analysis methods used to study the ways in which users (end users) receive and interpret information through information retrieval systems and looks at the potential for refining theories and adopting new analysis methods. Focuses on approaches that advocate the user centred perspective, including: the cognitive approach; and the holistic approach. Identifies and summarizes the significant studies and ideas since 1986 that are represented by these approaches and looks toward the design of more effective systems that are user oriented and incorporate features such as filtering that would provide retrieval results based on individual or group preferences. Concludes that systems designed from the user centred perspective would not only serve the intended audience but would further the user centred perspective of the entire information retrieval discipline
  15. Kling, R.: ¬The Internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing (2003) 0.01
    0.011203195 = product of:
      0.033609584 = sum of:
        0.033609584 = product of:
          0.06721917 = sum of:
            0.06721917 = weight(_text_:group in 4272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06721917 = score(doc=4272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.30684334 = fieldWeight in 4272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In the early 1990s, much of the enthusiasm for the use of electronic media to enhance scholarly communication focused an electronic journals, especially electronic-only, (pure) e journals (see for example, Peek & Newby's [1996] anthology). Much of the systematic research an the use of electronic media to enhance scholarly communication also focused an electronic journals. However, by the late 1990s, numerous scientific publishers had transformed their paper journals (p journals) into paper and electronic journals (p-e journals) and sold them via subscription models that did not provide the significant costs savings, speed of access, or breadth of audience that pure e -journal advocates had expected (Okerson, 1996). In 2001, a group of senior life scientists led a campaign to have publishers make their journals freely available online six months after publication (Russo, 2001). The campaign leaders, using the name "Public Library of Science," asked scientists to boycott journals that did not comply with these demands for open access. Although the proposal was discussed in scientific magazines and conferences, it apparently did not persuade any journal publishers to comply (Young, 2002). Most productive scientists, who work for major universities and research institutes
  16. Davenport, E.; Hall, H.: Organizational Knowledge and Communities of Practice (2002) 0.01
    0.011203195 = product of:
      0.033609584 = sum of:
        0.033609584 = product of:
          0.06721917 = sum of:
            0.06721917 = weight(_text_:group in 4293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06721917 = score(doc=4293,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.30684334 = fieldWeight in 4293, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4293)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A community of practice has recently been defined as "a flexible group of professionals, informally bound by common interests, who interact through interdependent tasks guided by a common purpose thereby embodying a store of common knowledge" (Jubert, 1999, p. 166). The association of communities of practice with the production of collective knowledge has long been recognized, and they have been objects of study for a number of decades in the context of professional communication, particularly communication in science (Abbott, 1988; Bazerman & Paradis, 1991). Recently, however, they have been invoked in the domain of organization studies as sites where people learn and share insights. If, as Stinchcombe suggests, an organization is "a set of stable social relations, dehberately created, with the explicit intention of continuously accomplishing some specific goals or purposes" (Stinchcombe, 1965, p. 142), where does this "flexible" and "embodied" source of knowledge fit? Can communities of practice be harnessed, engineered, and managed like other organizational groups, or does their strength lie in the fact that they operate outside the stable and persistent social relations that characterize the organization?
  17. Rader, H.B.: Library orientation and instruction - 1993 (1994) 0.01
    0.010687098 = product of:
      0.032061294 = sum of:
        0.032061294 = product of:
          0.06412259 = sum of:
            0.06412259 = weight(_text_:22 in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06412259 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Reference services review. 22(1994) no.4, S.81-
  18. Haythornthwaite, C.; Hagar, C.: ¬The social worlds of the Web (2004) 0.01
    0.009335997 = product of:
      0.028007988 = sum of:
        0.028007988 = product of:
          0.056015976 = sum of:
            0.056015976 = weight(_text_:group in 4282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056015976 = score(doc=4282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 4282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4282)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    We know this Web world. We live in it, particularly those of us in developed countries. Even if we do not go online daily, we live with itour culture is imprinted with online activity and vocabulary: e-mailing colleagues, surfing the Web, posting Web pages, blogging, gender-bending in cyberspace, texting and instant messaging friends, engaging in ecommerce, entering an online chat room, or morphing in an online world. We use it-to conduct business, find information, talk with friends and colleagues. We know it is something separate, yet we incorporate it into our daily lives. We identify with it, bringing to it behaviors and expectations we hold for the world in general. We approach it as explorers and entrepreneurs, ready to move into unknown opportunities and territory; creators and engineers, eager to build new structures; utopians for whom "the world of the Web" represents the chance to start again and "get it right" this time; utilitarians, ready to get what we can out of the new structures; and dystopians, for whom this is just more evidence that there is no way to "get it right." The word "world" has many connotations. The Oxford English Dictionary (http://dictionary.oed.com) gives 27 definitions for the noun "world" including: - The sphere within which one's interests are bound up or one's activities find scope; (one's) sphere of action or thought; the "realm" within which one moves or lives. - A group or system of things or beings associated by common characteristics (denoted by a qualifying word or phrase), or considered as constituting a unity. - Human society considered in relation to its activities, difficulties, temptations, and the like; hence, contextually, the ways, practices, or customs of the people among whom one lives; the occupations and interests of society at large.
  19. Looking for information : a survey on research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2016) 0.01
    0.009335997 = product of:
      0.028007988 = sum of:
        0.028007988 = product of:
          0.056015976 = sum of:
            0.056015976 = weight(_text_:group in 3803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056015976 = score(doc=3803,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 3803, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3803)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Bingley, UK : Emerald Group Publishing Limited
  20. Hsueh, D.C.: Recon road maps : retrospective conversion literature, 1980-1990 (1992) 0.01
    0.008549679 = product of:
      0.025649035 = sum of:
        0.025649035 = product of:
          0.05129807 = sum of:
            0.05129807 = weight(_text_:22 in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05129807 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 14(1992) nos.3/4, S.5-22

Years

Types

  • a 31
  • b 10
  • m 2
  • r 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…