Search (108 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.05
    0.05079958 = product of:
      0.15239874 = sum of:
        0.15239874 = sum of:
          0.1267497 = weight(_text_:group in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1267497 = score(doc=1447,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047327764 = queryNorm
              0.5785894 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
          0.025649035 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025649035 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047327764 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  2. Thomas, D.H.: ¬The effect of interface design on item selection in an online catalog (2001) 0.04
    0.041951157 = product of:
      0.12585346 = sum of:
        0.12585346 = sum of:
          0.10020443 = weight(_text_:group in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10020443 = score(doc=168,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047327764 = queryNorm
              0.45741507 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
          0.025649035 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025649035 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047327764 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The effect that content and layout of bibliographic displays had on the ability of end-users to process catalog information was tested using a 2 x 2 factorial experimental design. Participants were asked to perform two related tasks during the course of the experiment. In the first task, they were asked to select a set of items that they would examine further for a hypothetical paper they must write, using a simulated online catalog to make their assessments of relevance. In the second task, they were asked to examine 20 bibliographic records, decide whether they would choose to examine these items further on the shelf, and identify the data elements that they used to formulate their relevance decision. One group viewed bibliographic records on an interface similar to current online catalogs, one that used data labels and contained data elements commonly found. A second group viewed these records on an interface in which the labels had been removed, but the data elements were the same as those in the first. The third group viewed these records on a labeled display that included enhanced data elements on the brief record display. The final group viewed these records with the same brief record data elements as the third group, but with the labels removed, using ISBD and AACR2 punctuation standards. For the first task, participants using enhanced brief screen interfaces viewed more brief screens and fewer full screens than their counterparts. Screen durations for the second 10 screens were found to have dropped from those of the first 10 screens. Statistical analyses comparing demographic variables to the screen frequencies uncovered many significant differences. Participants using the enhanced-content interfaces made fewer selections from index and full screens, and more selections from brief screens. For the second task, participants who used enhanced-content interfaces were able to make some sort of relevance judgment more frequently than those who used standard-content interfaces.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.04
    0.04110273 = product of:
      0.12330818 = sum of:
        0.12330818 = sum of:
          0.07842237 = weight(_text_:group in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07842237 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047327764 = queryNorm
              0.35798392 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
          0.04488581 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04488581 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047327764 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  4. Li, Y.-O.; Leung, S.W.: Computer cataloging of electronic Journals in unstable Aggregator Databases the Hong Kong Baptist University Library experience (2001) 0.04
    0.035230905 = product of:
      0.105692714 = sum of:
        0.105692714 = sum of:
          0.06721917 = weight(_text_:group in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06721917 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047327764 = queryNorm
              0.30684334 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.03847355 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03847355 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047327764 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The growth and use of aggregator databases have presented libraries with both new opportunities for collection enhancement and new challenges of bibliographic control. How to integrate full-text electronic journal titles in unstable aggregator databases into a library's OPAC (Online Public Access Catalog) has been an especially taxing matter for libraries. This article describes the Hong Kong Baptist University Library's effort to integrate full-text electronic journal titles from three large, unstable aggregator databases into its INNOPAC-based OPAC. The library's electronic journal computer program (EJCOP) does this in a simple, direct, consistent, and accurate manner and addresses some of the issues elaborated in the January 2000 Final Report of the Task Group on Journals in Aggregator Databases of the Standing Committee on Automation of the Library of Congress Program for Cooperative Cataloging.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Markey, K.: Online catalog use : results of surveys and focus group interviews in several libraries (1983) 0.03
    0.029875187 = product of:
      0.08962556 = sum of:
        0.08962556 = product of:
          0.17925112 = sum of:
            0.17925112 = weight(_text_:group in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17925112 = score(doc=1994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.8182489 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  6. Ferguson, D.: Public online catalog and research libraries (1982) 0.03
    0.029875187 = product of:
      0.08962556 = sum of:
        0.08962556 = product of:
          0.17925112 = sum of:
            0.17925112 = weight(_text_:group in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17925112 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.8182489 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Stanford, Calif. : Research Libraries Group
  7. James, S.: OPAC forum 5 (1992) 0.03
    0.026406188 = product of:
      0.07921856 = sum of:
        0.07921856 = product of:
          0.15843712 = sum of:
            0.15843712 = weight(_text_:group in 5980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15843712 = score(doc=5980,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.72323674 = fieldWeight in 5980, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5980)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Editor
    Cataloguing and Indexing Group in Scotland / Scottish Academic Libraries Co-operative Training Group
  8. Connaway, L.S.; Johnson, D.W.; Searing, S.E.: Online catalogs from the users' perspective : the use of focus group interviews (1997) 0.02
    0.02263859 = product of:
      0.06791577 = sum of:
        0.06791577 = product of:
          0.13583153 = sum of:
            0.13583153 = weight(_text_:group in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13583153 = score(doc=602,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.6200464 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to elicit information from the users of the Wisconsin University at Madison online catalogue (Network Library System (NLS)). The General Library System (GLS) conducted focus group interviews with undergraduate students, graduate students, and faculty. Undergraduate students tend to utilize subject searching capabilities. Graduate students and faculty utilize subject searching only as a last resort; they typically search by known author or title. A significant number of the participants reported experience with library online catalogues other than NLS, although the majority of faculty reported very little experience with other online catalogues. All the focus group participants, but particularly the undergraduate students, evidenced confusion between keyword searching and searching controlled vocabulary. Inclusion of circulation status in the bibliographic records was identified as an important feature of the catalogue
  9. Larson, R.R.: Users look at online catalogs : results of a national survey of users and non-users of online public access catalogs (1982) 0.02
    0.02240639 = product of:
      0.06721917 = sum of:
        0.06721917 = product of:
          0.13443834 = sum of:
            0.13443834 = weight(_text_:group in 2972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13443834 = score(doc=2972,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.6136867 = fieldWeight in 2972, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2972)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Berkeley, Calif. : Division of Library Automation and Library Research and Analysis Group, Univ. of California
  10. Markey, K.: Thus spoke the OPAC user (1993) 0.02
    0.018671993 = product of:
      0.056015976 = sum of:
        0.056015976 = product of:
          0.11203195 = sum of:
            0.11203195 = weight(_text_:group in 5805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11203195 = score(doc=5805,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.5114056 = fieldWeight in 5805, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5805)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the results of focused group interviews conducted by OCLC of library users and OPACs. Library users, library public and technical services staff at six libraries were interviewed. Details their neeeds and perceptions
  11. Opacs in the UK : JANET-OPACs (1991) 0.02
    0.018671993 = product of:
      0.056015976 = sum of:
        0.056015976 = product of:
          0.11203195 = sum of:
            0.11203195 = weight(_text_:group in 799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11203195 = score(doc=799,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.5114056 = fieldWeight in 799, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=799)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Brighton : Janet user group for libraries
  12. Buchanen, N.L.; Rupp-Serano, K.; LaGrange, J.: ¬The effectiveness of a projected computersed presentation in teaching online library catalog searching (1992) 0.02
    0.01848433 = product of:
      0.055452988 = sum of:
        0.055452988 = product of:
          0.110905975 = sum of:
            0.110905975 = weight(_text_:group in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.110905975 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.5062657 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A computerised presentation teaching method of NOTIS commands and search strategies in on-line catalogues was produced using ShowPartner F/X software. Students viewed the presentation and completed a NOTIS search exercise. A 2nd group of students from the same class completed the exercise without having viewed the presentation. A comparison of the 2 groups' exercises and transaction logs show that the group that viewed the presentation proved better at using correct NOTIS commands and formulationg effective search strategies. The greatest differences between the 2 groups were in subject searching (LCSH and keyword) and in locating specific items
  13. Chen, H.-M.; Cooper, M.D.: Stochastic modeling of usage patterns in a Web-based information system (2002) 0.02
    0.018294744 = product of:
      0.05488423 = sum of:
        0.05488423 = product of:
          0.10976846 = sum of:
            0.10976846 = weight(_text_:group in 577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10976846 = score(doc=577,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.5010731 = fieldWeight in 577, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=577)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Users move from one state (or task) to another in an information system's labyrinth as they try to accomplish their work, and the amount of time they spend in each state varies. This article uses continuous-time stochastic models, mainly based on semi-Markov chains, to derive user state transition patterns (both in rates and in probabilities) in a Web-based information system. The methodology was demonstrated with 126,925 search sessions drawn from the transaction logs of the University of California's MELVYL® library catalog system (www.melvyLucop.edu). First, user sessions were categorized into six groups based on their similar use of the system. Second, by using a three-layer hierarchical taxonomy of the system Web pages, user sessions in each usage group were transformed into a sequence of states. All the usage groups but one have third-order sequential dependency in state transitions. The sole exception has fourth-order sequential dependency. The transition rates as well as transition probabilities of the semi-Markov model provide a background for interpreting user behavior probabilistically, at various levels of detail. Finally, the differences in derived usage patterns between usage groups were tested statistically. The test results showed that different groups have distinct patterns of system use. Knowledge of the extent of sequential dependency is beneficial because it allows one to predict a user's next move in a search space based on the past moves that have been made. It can also be used to help customize the design of the user interface to the system to facilitate interaction. The group CL6 labeled "knowledgeable and sophisticated usage" and the group CL7 labeled "unsophisticated usage" both had third-order sequential dependency and had the same most-frequently occurring search pattern: screen display, record display, screen display, and record display. The group CL8 called "highly interactive use with good search results" had fourth-order sequential dependency, and its most frequently occurring pattern was the same as CL6 and CL7 with one more screen display action added. The group CL13, called "known-item searching" had third-order sequential dependency, and its most frequently occurring pattern was index access, search with retrievals, screen display, and record display. Group CL14 called "help intensive searching," and CL18 called "relatively unsuccessful" both had thirdorder sequential dependency, and for both groups the most frequently occurring pattern was index access, search without retrievals, index access, and again, search without retrievals.
  14. Walker, S.: Improving subject access painlessly : recent work on the Okapi online catalogue projects (1988) 0.02
    0.017099358 = product of:
      0.05129807 = sum of:
        0.05129807 = product of:
          0.10259614 = sum of:
            0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10259614 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.21-31
  15. Hug, H.; Nöthiger, R.: ETHICS: an online public access catalogue at ETH-Bibliothek, Zürich (1988) 0.02
    0.017099358 = product of:
      0.05129807 = sum of:
        0.05129807 = product of:
          0.10259614 = sum of:
            0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10259614 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.133-142
  16. Wimmer, W.: Multimedia-Angebote im Bibliothekskatalog : Neue Möglichkeiten durch das ALLEGRO-Programm ALCARTA (1999) 0.02
    0.01511384 = product of:
      0.045341518 = sum of:
        0.045341518 = product of:
          0.090683036 = sum of:
            0.090683036 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.090683036 = score(doc=4368,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:36:10
    22. 1.2000 19:41:58
  17. Mitev, N.; Hildreth, C.R.: ¬Les catalogues interactifs en Grande-Bretagne et aux Etats-Unis (1989) 0.01
    0.014961937 = product of:
      0.04488581 = sum of:
        0.04488581 = product of:
          0.08977162 = sum of:
            0.08977162 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08977162 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 34(1989) no.1, S.22-47
  18. Wagner, H.: OPAC für jedermann? (1993) 0.01
    0.014961937 = product of:
      0.04488581 = sum of:
        0.04488581 = product of:
          0.08977162 = sum of:
            0.08977162 = weight(_text_:22 in 5575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08977162 = score(doc=5575,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5575, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5575)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Eine Replik zu Auer: OPAC und Zeichensatz (Mitteilungen der VÖB 46(1993) H.2, S.21-22)
  19. Auer, G.: Online-Kataloge und Zeichensatz (1993) 0.01
    0.014961937 = product of:
      0.04488581 = sum of:
        0.04488581 = product of:
          0.08977162 = sum of:
            0.08977162 = weight(_text_:22 in 7584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08977162 = score(doc=7584,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7584, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekare. 46(1993) H.2, S.21-22
  20. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.4: Onderwerpsontsluiting en on-line catalogi (1990) 0.01
    0.014961937 = product of:
      0.04488581 = sum of:
        0.04488581 = product of:
          0.08977162 = sum of:
            0.08977162 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08977162 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047327764 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330

Years

Languages

  • e 82
  • d 20
  • chi 2
  • f 2
  • nl 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 98
  • r 4
  • el 3
  • m 3
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • i 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…