-
Tomlinson, H.: Report on work for new general classification scheme (1969)
0.02
0.02240639 = product of:
0.06721917 = sum of:
0.06721917 = product of:
0.13443834 = sum of:
0.13443834 = weight(_text_:group in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13443834 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.6136867 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Classification and information control. Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968
-
Austin, D.: ¬The theory of integrative levels reconsidered as the basis of a general classification (1969)
0.02
0.02240639 = product of:
0.06721917 = sum of:
0.06721917 = product of:
0.13443834 = sum of:
0.13443834 = weight(_text_:group in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13443834 = score(doc=1286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.6136867 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Classification and information control. Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968
-
Wilson, T.D.: ¬The work of the British Classification Research Group (1972)
0.02
0.02240639 = product of:
0.06721917 = sum of:
0.06721917 = product of:
0.13443834 = sum of:
0.13443834 = weight(_text_:group in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13443834 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.6136867 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Foskett, D.J.: Classification for a general index language: a review of recent research by the Classification Research Group (1970)
0.02
0.02240639 = product of:
0.06721917 = sum of:
0.06721917 = product of:
0.13443834 = sum of:
0.13443834 = weight(_text_:group in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13443834 = score(doc=3403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.6136867 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Classification and information control : Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968 (1969)
0.02
0.015843712 = product of:
0.04753113 = sum of:
0.04753113 = product of:
0.09506226 = sum of:
0.09506226 = weight(_text_:group in 3402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09506226 = score(doc=3402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.43394202 = fieldWeight in 3402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Editor
- Classification Research Group
-
Sukhmaneva, E.G.: Modern development of faceted classification
0.01
0.014937594 = product of:
0.04481278 = sum of:
0.04481278 = product of:
0.08962556 = sum of:
0.08962556 = weight(_text_:group in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08962556 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.40912446 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Brings out the principles of faceted classification and its advantages with regard to multi-aspect indexing. Also considers the contributions of Dr. S.R. Ranganathan, the Classification Research Group (London) and others. The concepts of Fundamental Categories, Rounds and Levels, Integrative Levels, etc. are discussed.
-
Sukhmaneva, E.G.: ¬The problems of notation and faceted classification
0.01
0.014937594 = product of:
0.04481278 = sum of:
0.04481278 = product of:
0.08962556 = sum of:
0.08962556 = weight(_text_:group in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08962556 = score(doc=3300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.40912446 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Brings out the principles of faceted classification and its advantages with regard to multi-aspect indexing. Also considers the contributions of Dr. S.R. Ranganathan, the Classification Research Group (London) and others.
-
Broughton, V.: Facet analysis : the evolution of an idea (2023)
0.01
0.013070395 = product of:
0.039211184 = sum of:
0.039211184 = product of:
0.07842237 = sum of:
0.07842237 = weight(_text_:group in 1164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07842237 = score(doc=1164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.35798392 = fieldWeight in 1164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Facets are widely encountered in information and knowledge organization, but there is much disparity in the use and understanding of concepts such as "facet," "facet analysis," and "faceted classification." The paper traces the history of these ideas and how they have been employed in different contexts. What may be termed the classical school of faceted classification is given some prominence, through the ideas of Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, but other interpretations are also explored. Attention is paid not only to the idea of what facet analysis is, and what purpose it serves, but also the language utilized to describe and explain it.
-
Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974)
0.01
0.010687098 = product of:
0.032061294 = sum of:
0.032061294 = product of:
0.06412259 = sum of:
0.06412259 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06412259 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
-
Beghtol, C.: From the universe of knowledge to the universe of concepts : the structural revolution in classification for information retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.009335997 = product of:
0.028007988 = sum of:
0.028007988 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = weight(_text_:group in 1856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056015976 = score(doc=1856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 1856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1856)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- During the twentieth century, bibliographic classification theory underwent a structural revolution. The first modern bibliographic classifications were top-down systems that started at the universe of knowledge and subdivided that universe downward to minute subclasses. After the invention of faceted classification by S.R. Ranganathan, the ideal was to build bottom-up classifications that started with the universe of concepts and built upward to larger and larger faceted classes. This ideal has not been achieved, and the two kinds of classification systems are not mutually exclusive. This paper examines the process by which this structural revolution was accomplished by looking at the spread of facet theory after 1924 when Ranganathan attended the School of Librarianship, London, through selected classification textbooks that were published after that date. To this end, the paper examines the role of W.C.B. Sayers as a teacher and author of three editions of The Manual of Classification for Librarians and Bibliographers. Sayers influenced both Ranganathan and the various members of the Classification Research Group (CRG) who were his students. Further, the paper contrasts the methods of evaluating classification systems that arose between Sayers's Canons of Classification in 1915- 1916 and J. Mills's A Modern Outline of Library Classification in 1960 in order to demonstrate the speed with which one kind of classificatory structure was overtaken by another.
-
Gnoli, C.: ¬The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications (2006)
0.01
0.009335997 = product of:
0.028007988 = sum of:
0.028007988 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = weight(_text_:group in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056015976 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Disciplines are felt by many to be a constraint in classification, though they are a structuring principle of most bibliographic classification schemes. A non-disciplinary approach has been explored by the Classification Research Group, and research in this direction has been resumed recently by the Integrative Level Classification project. This paper focuses on the role and the definition of facets in non-disciplinary schemes. A generalized definition of facets is suggested with reference to predicate logic, allowing for having facets of phenomena as well as facets of disciplines. The general categories under which facets are often subsumed can be related ontologically to the evolutionary sequence of integrative levels. As a facet can be semantically connected with phenomena from any other part of a general scheme, its values can belong to three types, here called extra-defined foci (either special or general), and context-defined foci. Non-disciplinary freely faceted classification is being tested by applying it to little bibliographic samples stored in a MySQL database, and developing Web search interfaces to demonstrate possible uses of the described techniques.
-
Gnoli, C.; Pullman, T.; Cousson, P.; Merli, G.; Szostak, R.: Representing the structural elements of a freely faceted classification (2011)
0.01
0.009335997 = product of:
0.028007988 = sum of:
0.028007988 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = weight(_text_:group in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056015976 = score(doc=4825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Freely faceted classifications allow for free combination of concepts across all knowledge domains, and for sorting of the resulting compound classmarks. Starting from work by the Classification Research Group, the Integrative Levels Classification (ILC) project has produced a first edition of a general freely faceted scheme. The system is managed as a MySQL database, and can be browsed through a Web interface. The ILC database structure provides a case for identifying and representing the structural elements of any freely faceted classification. These belong to both the notational and the verbal planes. Notational elements include: arrays, chains, deictics, facets, foci, place of definition of foci, examples of combinations, subclasses of a faceted class, groupings, related classes; verbal elements include: main caption, synonyms, descriptions, included terms, related terms, notes. Encoding of some of these elements in an international mark-up format like SKOS can be problematic, especially as this does not provide for faceted structures, although approximate SKOS equivalents are identified for most of them.
-
Dousa, T.: Everything Old is New Again : Perspectivism and Polyhierarchy in Julius O. Kaiser's Theory of Systematic Indexing (2007)
0.01
0.009335997 = product of:
0.028007988 = sum of:
0.028007988 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = weight(_text_:group in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056015976 = score(doc=4835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Proceedings 18th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Ed.: Lussky, Joan
-
Aparecida Moura, M.: Emerging discursive formations, folksonomy and social semantic information spaces (SSIS) : the contributions of the theory of integrative levels in the studies carried out by the Classification Research Group (CRG) (2014)
0.01
0.009335997 = product of:
0.028007988 = sum of:
0.028007988 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = weight(_text_:group in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056015976 = score(doc=1395,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017)
0.01
0.009335997 = product of:
0.028007988 = sum of:
0.028007988 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = weight(_text_:group in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056015976 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Various fields, each with its own theories, techniques, and tools, are concerned with identifying and representing the conceptual structure of specific knowledge domains. This paper compares facet analysis, an analytic technique coming out of knowledge organization (especially as undertaken by members of the Classification Research Group (CRG)), with semantic frame analysis, an analytic technique coming out of lexical semantics (especially as undertaken by the developers of Frame-Net) The investigation addresses three questions: 1) how do CRG-style facet analysis and semantic frame analysis characterize the conceptual structures that they identify?; 2) how similar are the techniques they use?; and, 3) how similar are the conceptual structures they produce? Facet analysis is concerned with the logical categories underlying the terminology of an entire field, while semantic frame analysis is concerned with the participant-and-prop structure manifest in sentences about a type of situation or event. When their scope of application is similar, as, for example, in the areas of the performing arts or education, the resulting facets and semantic frame elements often bear striking resemblance, without being the same; facets are more often expressed as semantic types, while frame elements are more often expressed as roles.
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.01
0.008549679 = product of:
0.025649035 = sum of:
0.025649035 = product of:
0.05129807 = sum of:
0.05129807 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05129807 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
-
Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012)
0.01
0.008549679 = product of:
0.025649035 = sum of:
0.025649035 = product of:
0.05129807 = sum of:
0.05129807 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05129807 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 2. 6.2013 18:33:22
-
Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010)
0.01
0.0074809687 = product of:
0.022442905 = sum of:
0.022442905 = product of:
0.04488581 = sum of:
0.04488581 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04488581 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
-
Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012)
0.01
0.0074809687 = product of:
0.022442905 = sum of:
0.022442905 = product of:
0.04488581 = sum of:
0.04488581 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04488581 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:31:25
-
Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010)
0.01
0.005343549 = product of:
0.016030647 = sum of:
0.016030647 = product of:
0.032061294 = sum of:
0.032061294 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032061294 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
