-
CRG-Bulletin No.12 (1985)
0.04
0.037343986 = product of:
0.11203195 = sum of:
0.11203195 = product of:
0.2240639 = sum of:
0.2240639 = weight(_text_:group in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2240639 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
1.0228112 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Editor
- Classification Research Group
-
Markey, K.: Online catalog use : results of surveys and focus group interviews in several libraries (1983)
0.03
0.029875187 = product of:
0.08962556 = sum of:
0.08962556 = product of:
0.17925112 = sum of:
0.17925112 = weight(_text_:group in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17925112 = score(doc=1994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.8182489 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Ferguson, D.: Public online catalog and research libraries (1982)
0.03
0.029875187 = product of:
0.08962556 = sum of:
0.08962556 = product of:
0.17925112 = sum of:
0.17925112 = weight(_text_:group in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17925112 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.8182489 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Imprint
- Stanford, Calif. : Research Libraries Group
-
Jones, K.P.: How do we index? : a report of some Aslib Information Group activity (1983)
0.03
0.029875187 = product of:
0.08962556 = sum of:
0.08962556 = product of:
0.17925112 = sum of:
0.17925112 = weight(_text_:group in 2736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17925112 = score(doc=2736,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.8182489 = fieldWeight in 2736, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2736)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Larson, R.R.: Users look at online catalogs : results of a national survey of users and non-users of online public access catalogs (1982)
0.02
0.02240639 = product of:
0.06721917 = sum of:
0.06721917 = product of:
0.13443834 = sum of:
0.13443834 = weight(_text_:group in 2972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13443834 = score(doc=2972,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.6136867 = fieldWeight in 2972, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2972)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Imprint
- Berkeley, Calif. : Division of Library Automation and Library Research and Analysis Group, Univ. of California
-
Databases for books (1983)
0.02
0.02240639 = product of:
0.06721917 = sum of:
0.06721917 = product of:
0.13443834 = sum of:
0.13443834 = weight(_text_:group in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13443834 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.6136867 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Editor
- MARC users group
-
Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981)
0.02
0.021374196 = product of:
0.06412259 = sum of:
0.06412259 = product of:
0.12824517 = sum of:
0.12824517 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12824517 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
-
Pietris, M.K.D.: LCSH update (1988)
0.02
0.021374196 = product of:
0.06412259 = sum of:
0.06412259 = product of:
0.12824517 = sum of:
0.12824517 = weight(_text_:22 in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12824517 = score(doc=2798,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 13(1988), S.19-22
-
Woods, W.A.: What's important about knowledge representation? (1983)
0.02
0.021374196 = product of:
0.06412259 = sum of:
0.06412259 = product of:
0.12824517 = sum of:
0.12824517 = weight(_text_:22 in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12824517 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Computer. 16(1983) no.10, S.22-27
-
Hume, L.P.: ¬The Research Libraries Group RLG's Research Information Management Program : new information resources for scholars (1989)
0.02
0.02112495 = product of:
0.06337485 = sum of:
0.06337485 = product of:
0.1267497 = sum of:
0.1267497 = weight(_text_:group in 5696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1267497 = score(doc=5696,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.5785894 = fieldWeight in 5696, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5696)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Traces the work of the Research Libraries Group in developing products and services that support traditional library operations. Notes activities of the Program for Research Information Management (PRIMA): including the Medieval and Early Modern Data Bank (MEMDB) and the Geoinformation Project
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.02
0.02088029 = product of:
0.06264087 = sum of:
0.06264087 = product of:
0.1879226 = sum of:
0.1879226 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1879226 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.40124533 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Classification Research Group: ¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (1985)
0.02
0.020196848 = product of:
0.060590543 = sum of:
0.060590543 = product of:
0.121181086 = sum of:
0.121181086 = weight(_text_:group in 3640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.121181086 = score(doc=3640,freq=26.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.5531697 = fieldWeight in 3640, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This classic paper presents the reasoning behind the research undertaken by the Classification Research Group in London, beginning in 1952 and producing, by 1955, the direction in which the Group's efforts were to go in the next thirty years. The Group's original purpose was to review the basic principles of indexing and classification without committing itself to any existing system. It began by uncovering - among existing systems such as indexes, classifications, automatic selectors, and other information retrieval systems - the steps in the process by means of which a search was performed. The Group went over this very carefully, identifying parts of the process each step of the way. At the time this work was performed systems such as UNITERMS, which did not survive, and other alphabetical coordinated indexes, mainly experimental, were a dime a dozen. Classification to most librarians meant Dewey and the Library of Congress systems, both of which have very serious shortcomings from an intellectual point of view. The Group finally came to the conclusion that a classification of knowledge was necessary for constructing any successful retrieval system. The question then became one of deciding which kind of classification system. The members identified ten unsatisfactory features of existing systems. In fact, they could not find any general class schedule that either was satisfactory or could be made satisfactory. Obviously then, a new system had to be made. The question became one of how to do this. Existing theories did not conform to the theory of logical division; dividing and subdividing an the basis of a single characteristic was not followed. Thus logical division, which is a "top down" method of analysis, was rejected. Generic relationships would have to be made by some other methodology. A "bottom-up" or inductive, as opposed to deductive, method was a possibility. The Group actually decided to use a system in which a given genus could be subdivided in more than one way, thus "yielding a homogeneous group of collateral species."
The technique chosen was S. R. Ranganathan's facet analysis (q.v.). This method works from the bottom up: a term is categorized according to its parent class, as a kind, state, property, action, operation upon something, result of an Operation, agent, and so on. These modes of definition represent characteristics of division. Following the publication of this paper, the group worked for over ten years developing systems following this general pattern with various changes and experimental arrangements. Ranganathan's Colon Classification was the original of this type of method, but the Group rejected his contention that there are only five fundamental categories to be found in the knowledge base. They did, in fact, end up with varying numbers of categories in the experimental systems which they ultimately were to make. Notation was also recognized as a problem, being complex, illogical, lengthy, obscure and hard to understand. The Group tried to develop a rationale for notation, both as an ordering and as a finding device. To describe and represent a class, a notation could be long, but as a finding device, brevity would be preferable. The Group was to experiment with this aspect of classification and produce a number of interesting results. The Classification Research Group began meeting informally to discuss classification matters in 1952 and continues to meet, usually in London, to the present day. Most of the British authors whose work is presented in these pages have been members for most of the Group's life and continue in it. The Group maintains the basic position outlined in this paper to the present day. Its experimental approach has resulted in much more information about the nature and functions of classification systems. The ideal system has yet to be found. Classification research is still a promising area. The future calls for more experimentation based an reasoned approaches, following the example set by the Classification Research Group.
-
Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures (1989)
0.02
0.018671993 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = product of:
0.11203195 = sum of:
0.11203195 = weight(_text_:group in 2533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11203195 = score(doc=2533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.5114056 = fieldWeight in 2533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2533)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Media didactics have recently become more firmly grounded in cognitive theory, with an increasing concern for the internal processes of knowledge representation and acquisition. With this cognitive aspect in mind, an international group of researches held a meeting in Tübingen to present and discuss the theoretical approaches to an empirical investigation of knowledge acquisition from text and pictures
-
Seiser, V.: ERIC through the ages : searching for information about specific age groups in the ERIC database (1987)
0.02
0.018671993 = product of:
0.056015976 = sum of:
0.056015976 = product of:
0.11203195 = sum of:
0.11203195 = weight(_text_:group in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11203195 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.5114056 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Explores search strategies for questions in which age group or stage of life is a significant variable and notes specific problems posed by certain indexing practices in the ERIC data base.
-
Zotter-Stratka, H.: ¬The joy of cataloguing : am Beispiel BIBOS (1988)
0.02
0.01848433 = product of:
0.055452988 = sum of:
0.055452988 = product of:
0.110905975 = sum of:
0.110905975 = weight(_text_:group in 1519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110905975 = score(doc=1519,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.5062657 = fieldWeight in 1519, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1519)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Although it was decided more than a year ago to adopt BIBOS Catloguing System for use in Austrian academic libraries, the Working Group on Cataloguing has been voicing doubts as its use begins. Lists these doubts. Deals in detail wih the problem of the hierarchical structure of BIBOS into which records of multi-volume works have to be fitted. In Sept 88 the computer company (EDV GmbH) itself came forward with a technical improvement which would allow the build up of records from the smaller fields, instead of imposing the shape of records from the ultimate data set, which had on occasion even led to contravention of the nominative cataloguing rules, RAK-WB. Cataloguing in the interim period will be complex. The working group has still made no final decision.
-
Gehirn und Nervensystem : woraus sie bestehen - wie sie funktionieren - was sie leisten (1988)
0.02
0.01813661 = product of:
0.054409824 = sum of:
0.054409824 = product of:
0.10881965 = sum of:
0.10881965 = weight(_text_:22 in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10881965 = score(doc=670,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 18:22:27
-
Junginger, F.: Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog: RSWK : Ergänzungen und Berichtigungen Nr.1 (1988)
0.02
0.017099358 = product of:
0.05129807 = sum of:
0.05129807 = product of:
0.10259614 = sum of:
0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10259614 = score(doc=195,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 195, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=195)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988), S.552-563
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.02
0.017099358 = product of:
0.05129807 = sum of:
0.05129807 = product of:
0.10259614 = sum of:
0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10259614 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
-
Tell, B.V.: Cataloging rules and database production : implications for manpower training in a developing country (1989)
0.02
0.017099358 = product of:
0.05129807 = sum of:
0.05129807 = product of:
0.10259614 = sum of:
0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10259614 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.22-27
-
Grundsätze der Universellen Dezimalklassifikation (DK) und Regeln für ihre Revision und Veröffentlichung (1981)
0.02
0.017099358 = product of:
0.05129807 = sum of:
0.05129807 = product of:
0.10259614 = sum of:
0.10259614 = weight(_text_:22 in 1175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10259614 = score(doc=1175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047327764 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1175)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- DK-Mitteilungen. 25(1981) Nr.4, S.15-22
