Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Neet, H.: Assoziationsrelationen in Dokumentationslexika für die verbale Sacherschließung (1984) 0.04
    0.03787185 = product of:
      0.05680777 = sum of:
        0.02481461 = weight(_text_:h in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02481461 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113001004 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045483325 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
        0.031993162 = product of:
          0.063986324 = sum of:
            0.063986324 = weight(_text_:von in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063986324 = score(doc=1254,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.12134718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045483325 = queryNorm
                0.52729964 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri und Dokumentationslexika können als Varianten von onomasiologischen Wörterbüchern aufgefaßt werden, deren besonderes Interesse für die Linguistik darin besteht, daß Äquivalenz-, Hierarchie- und Assoziationsrelationen angegegeben werden. Regelwerke und Beiträge werden besprochen, die sich mit der Ausweisung von "verwandten" Begriffen in der bibliothekarischen und dokumentarischen Praxis befassen. Belege zu Musterbeispielen von "siehe auch"- und "related term"-Verweisungen werden anhand von drei deutschsprachigen Schlagwortregistern aufgelistet. Die Assoziationsrelationen werden in paradigmatische und syntagmatische Beziehungen eingeteilt. Auch Gruppierungen nach Begriffsfeldern und Assoziationsfeldern sind möglich. Untersuchungen von Assoziationsrelationen im Sachbereich "Buchwesen" bestätigen die Vermutung, daß die Mehrzahl der Verweisungen das gemeinsame Vorkommen bestimmter Begriffe in typischen Kontexten der außersprachlichen Wirklichkeit betrifft.
  2. Busch, A.: Terminologiemanagement : erfolgreicher Wissenstransfer durch Concept-Maps und die Überlegungen in DGI-AKTS (2021) 0.03
    0.026081592 = product of:
      0.039122388 = sum of:
        0.02481461 = weight(_text_:h in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02481461 = score(doc=422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113001004 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045483325 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
        0.014307777 = product of:
          0.028615555 = sum of:
            0.028615555 = weight(_text_:von in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028615555 = score(doc=422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12134718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045483325 = queryNorm
                0.23581557 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die Organisation eines effektiven und effizienten Wissenstransfers ist eine große Herausforderung moderner Fachkommunikation. Durch die Aufbereitung von Begriffen und Begriffsbeziehungen in Begriffssystemen und deren übersichtliche und verständliche Visualisierung in einer Concept-Map macht das Terminologiemanagement Wissen einfach und schnell verfügbar. So kann es effizienter für die Fachkommunikation genutzt werden.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 72(2021) H.4, S.185-193
  3. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.02
    0.022725051 = product of:
      0.06817515 = sum of:
        0.06817515 = sum of:
          0.025038611 = weight(_text_:von in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025038611 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12134718 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045483325 = queryNorm
              0.20633863 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.043136537 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043136537 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15927485 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045483325 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  4. Engerer, V.: Thesauri, Terminologien, Lexika, Fachsprachen : Kontrolle, physische Verortung und das Prinzip der Syntagmatisierung von Vokabularen (2014) 0.02
    0.022524431 = product of:
      0.033786647 = sum of:
        0.018610956 = weight(_text_:h in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018610956 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113001004 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045483325 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
        0.01517569 = product of:
          0.03035138 = sum of:
            0.03035138 = weight(_text_:von in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03035138 = score(doc=3644,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12134718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045483325 = queryNorm
                0.2501202 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Ich unternehme in diesem Beitrag den Versuch, die Informationswissenschaft - hier gedeutet als 'Information Retrieval'- Disziplin - einer synchronen Querschnittsanalyse zu unterziehen, welche die aktuelle Position dieser Disziplin im Feld anderer zeichen- und wortschatzorientierter Disziplinen (neben der Linguistik die Terminologielehre und die Fachsprachenforschung) näher bestimmen soll. Im Rahmen der Analyse wird von einem Information Retrieval-Kern der Informationswissenschaft ausgegangen, welcher den Informationssuchkontext sowie die Konzepte des Informationsbedarfs und der Relevanz als für diese Disziplin zentrale Komponenten ansieht. Synchron wird das Verhältnis der Informationswissenschaft zu benachbarten Disziplinen durch eine Reihe disziplinspezifischer Zeichenanforderungen erklärt, wodurch ein systemischer Zusammenhang entsteht, der die Informationswissenschaft mit den drei anderen zeichenbezogenen und vokabularorientierten Disziplinen in Beziehung setzt. Das Verhältnis zwischen diesen Disziplinen wird anhand der Dimensionen Kontrolle/Verbindlichkeit sowie Verortung des Vokabulars ("im Kopf" vs. in externen Dokumenten) aufgezeigt, und es wird ein übergeordnetes Prinzip der Syntagmatisierung, welches die beiden Dimensionen vereint, vorgeschlagen.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.2, S.99-108
  5. Haldenwanger, H.H.M.: Begriff und Sprache in der Dokumentation (1961) 0.02
    0.016543074 = product of:
      0.04962922 = sum of:
        0.04962922 = weight(_text_:h in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04962922 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113001004 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045483325 = queryNorm
            0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 12(1961) H.2, S.65-68
  6. Dietze, J.: ¬Die semantische Struktur der Thesauruslexik (1988) 0.01
    0.014475188 = product of:
      0.043425564 = sum of:
        0.043425564 = weight(_text_:h in 6051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043425564 = score(doc=6051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113001004 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045483325 = queryNorm
            0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 6051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6051)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg: Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe. 37(1988) H.6, S.120-123
  7. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.01
    0.014378846 = product of:
      0.043136537 = sum of:
        0.043136537 = product of:
          0.086273074 = sum of:
            0.086273074 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086273074 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15927485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045483325 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  8. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.01
    0.011619862 = product of:
      0.034859587 = sum of:
        0.034859587 = product of:
          0.06971917 = sum of:
            0.06971917 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06971917 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15927485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045483325 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  9. Winograd, T.: Software für Sprachverarbeitung (1984) 0.01
    0.01033942 = product of:
      0.03101826 = sum of:
        0.03101826 = weight(_text_:h in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03101826 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113001004 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045483325 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 1984, H.11, S.88-102
  10. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.01
    0.010270605 = product of:
      0.030811813 = sum of:
        0.030811813 = product of:
          0.061623625 = sum of:
            0.061623625 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061623625 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15927485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045483325 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
  11. Krömmelbein, U.: Natürliche Sprache und Strukturprinzipien von Dokumentationssprachen : eine vergleichende Analyse (1981) 0.01
    0.009538518 = product of:
      0.028615555 = sum of:
        0.028615555 = product of:
          0.05723111 = sum of:
            0.05723111 = weight(_text_:von in 1372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05723111 = score(doc=1372,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12134718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045483325 = queryNorm
                0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 1372, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1372)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  12. Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Grenzen des Thesaurus-Verfahrens bei der Wiedergabe von Begriffsrelationen (1975) 0.01
    0.009538518 = product of:
      0.028615555 = sum of:
        0.028615555 = product of:
          0.05723111 = sum of:
            0.05723111 = weight(_text_:von in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05723111 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12134718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045483325 = queryNorm
                0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  13. Dahlberg, I.: Über Gegenstände, Begriffe, Definitionen und Benennungen: zur möglichen Neufassung von DIN 2330 (1976) 0.01
    0.009538518 = product of:
      0.028615555 = sum of:
        0.028615555 = product of:
          0.05723111 = sum of:
            0.05723111 = weight(_text_:von in 1390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05723111 = score(doc=1390,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12134718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045483325 = queryNorm
                0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 1390, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1390)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  14. Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996) 0.01
    0.007311074 = product of:
      0.021933222 = sum of:
        0.021933222 = weight(_text_:h in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021933222 = score(doc=6050,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.113001004 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045483325 = queryNorm
            0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
  15. Peters, I.; Weller. K.: Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in knowledge organization systems (2008) 0.01
    0.007237594 = product of:
      0.021712782 = sum of:
        0.021712782 = weight(_text_:h in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021712782 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113001004 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045483325 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.2, S.100-107
  16. Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998) 0.01
    0.007189423 = product of:
      0.021568269 = sum of:
        0.021568269 = product of:
          0.043136537 = sum of:
            0.043136537 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043136537 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15927485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045483325 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  17. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.01
    0.007189423 = product of:
      0.021568269 = sum of:
        0.021568269 = product of:
          0.043136537 = sum of:
            0.043136537 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043136537 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15927485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045483325 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  18. DIN 31623: Indexierung zur inhaltlichen Erschließung von Dokumenten : T.1: Begriffe, Grundlagen; T.2: Gleichordnende Indexierung mit Deskriptoren; T.3: Syntaktische Indexierung mit Deskriptoren (1988) 0.01
    0.0071538887 = product of:
      0.021461666 = sum of:
        0.021461666 = product of:
          0.04292333 = sum of:
            0.04292333 = weight(_text_:von in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04292333 = score(doc=832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12134718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045483325 = queryNorm
                0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  19. Sechser, O.: Beziehungen im Sprachsystem und in Texten (1992) 0.01
    0.0071538887 = product of:
      0.021461666 = sum of:
        0.021461666 = product of:
          0.04292333 = sum of:
            0.04292333 = weight(_text_:von in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04292333 = score(doc=1369,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12134718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045483325 = queryNorm
                0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Kognitive Ansätze zum Ordnen und Darstellen von Wissen. 2. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO Sektion einschl. der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als Werkzeuge der Sprachtechnologie", Weilburg, 15.-18.10.1991
  20. Dietze, J.: Informationsrecherchesprache und deren Lexik : Bemerkungen zur Terminologiediskussion (1980) 0.01
    0.0062036524 = product of:
      0.018610956 = sum of:
        0.018610956 = weight(_text_:h in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018610956 = score(doc=32,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113001004 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045483325 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen. 94(1980) H.10, S.460-464