-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.07
0.06991803 = product of:
0.13983606 = sum of:
0.13983606 = sum of:
0.07806321 = weight(_text_:r in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07806321 = score(doc=4992,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045593463 = queryNorm
0.5172279 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.061772846 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061772846 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045593463 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011)
0.01
0.011709481 = product of:
0.023418961 = sum of:
0.023418961 = product of:
0.046837922 = sum of:
0.046837922 = weight(_text_:r in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046837922 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045593463 = queryNorm
0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018)
0.01
0.009757902 = product of:
0.019515803 = sum of:
0.019515803 = product of:
0.039031606 = sum of:
0.039031606 = weight(_text_:r in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039031606 = score(doc=5226,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045593463 = queryNorm
0.25861394 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012)
0.01
0.00965983 = product of:
0.01931966 = sum of:
0.01931966 = product of:
0.03863932 = sum of:
0.03863932 = weight(_text_:r in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03863932 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045593463 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.: Remarks on the paper by A. De Visscher, "what does the g-index really measure?" (2012)
0.01
0.00965983 = product of:
0.01931966 = sum of:
0.01931966 = product of:
0.03863932 = sum of:
0.03863932 = weight(_text_:r in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03863932 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045593463 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The author presents a different view on properties of impact measures than given in the paper of De Visscher (2011). He argues that a good impact measure works better when citations are concentrated rather than spread out over articles. The author also presents theoretical evidence that the g-index and the R-index can be close to the square root of the total number of citations, whereas this is not the case for the A-index. Here the author confirms an assertion of De Visscher.
-
Egghe, L.: Influence of adding or deleting items and sources on the h-index (2010)
0.01
0.0082798535 = product of:
0.016559707 = sum of:
0.016559707 = product of:
0.033119414 = sum of:
0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033119414 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045593463 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Adding or deleting items such as self-citations has an influence on the h-index of an author. This influence will be proved mathematically in this article. We hereby prove the experimental finding in E. Gianoli and M.A. Molina-Montenegro ([2009]) that the influence of adding or deleting self-citations on the h-index is greater for low values of the h-index. Why this is logical also is shown by a simple theoretical example. Adding or deleting sources such as adding or deleting minor contributions of an author also has an influence on the h-index of this author; this influence is modeled in this article. This model explains some practical examples found in X. Hu, R. Rousseau, and J. Chen (in press).
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Applications of the generalized law of Benford to informetric data (2012)
0.01
0.0082798535 = product of:
0.016559707 = sum of:
0.016559707 = product of:
0.033119414 = sum of:
0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033119414 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045593463 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
