-
Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996)
0.05
0.04785714 = sum of:
0.004123207 = product of:
0.037108865 = sum of:
0.037108865 = weight(_text_:p in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037108865 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.043733932 = sum of:
0.008533655 = weight(_text_:a in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008533655 = score(doc=80,freq=10.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.035200275 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035200275 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
- Abstract
- There is a decrease in the incidence of explicit references to a paper over time, hence the assumption that information ages. In a study which attempts to discover whether information really ages it is necessary to include eponyms, anonyms and footnote references. Reports a pilot study which demonstrates that there is an increase over time in the frequency of use of eponyms
- Footnote
- Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
- Type
- a
-
Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016)
0.05
0.046956215 = sum of:
0.004123207 = product of:
0.037108865 = sum of:
0.037108865 = weight(_text_:p in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037108865 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.042833008 = sum of:
0.007632732 = weight(_text_:a in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007632732 = score(doc=4942,freq=8.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.035200275 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035200275 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
- Date
- 20. 1.2019 11:22:31
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
- Type
- a
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.04
0.03901664 = product of:
0.07803328 = sum of:
0.07803328 = sum of:
0.007632732 = weight(_text_:a in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007632732 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.07040055 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07040055 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
- Type
- a
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.04
0.03901664 = product of:
0.07803328 = sum of:
0.07803328 = sum of:
0.007632732 = weight(_text_:a in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007632732 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.07040055 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07040055 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Type
- a
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.04
0.03901664 = product of:
0.07803328 = sum of:
0.07803328 = sum of:
0.007632732 = weight(_text_:a in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007632732 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.07040055 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07040055 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
- Type
- a
-
Albarrán, P.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: References made and citations received by scientific articles (2011)
0.04
0.03650372 = sum of:
0.0030924056 = product of:
0.02783165 = sum of:
0.02783165 = weight(_text_:p in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783165 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.033411317 = sum of:
0.007011112 = weight(_text_:a in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007011112 = score(doc=4185,freq=12.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.026400207 = weight(_text_:22 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026400207 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
- Abstract
- This article studies massive evidence about references made and citations received after a 5-year citation window by 3.7 million articles published in 1998 to 2002 in 22 scientific fields. We find that the distributions of references made and citations received share a number of basic features across sciences. Reference distributions are rather skewed to the right while citation distributions are even more highly skewed: The mean is about 20 percentage points to the right of the median, and articles with a remarkable or an outstanding number of citations represent about 9% of the total. Moreover, the existence of a power law representing the upper tail of citation distributions cannot be rejected in 17 fields whose articles represent 74.7% of the total. Contrary to the evidence in other contexts, the value of the scale parameter is above 3.5 in 13 of the 17 cases. Finally, power laws are typically small, but capture a considerable proportion of the total citations received.
- Type
- a
-
Kronegger, L.; Mali, F.; Ferligoj, A.; Doreian, P.: Classifying scientific disciplines in Slovenia : a study of the evolution of collaboration structures (2015)
0.04
0.03589285 = sum of:
0.0030924056 = product of:
0.02783165 = sum of:
0.02783165 = weight(_text_:p in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783165 = score(doc=1639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.032800447 = sum of:
0.006400241 = weight(_text_:a in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006400241 = score(doc=1639,freq=10.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
0.026400207 = weight(_text_:22 in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026400207 = score(doc=1639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
- Abstract
- We explore classifying scientific disciplines including their temporal features by focusing on their collaboration structures over time. Bibliometric data for Slovenian researchers registered at the Slovenian Research Agency were used. These data were obtained from the Slovenian National Current Research Information System. We applied a recently developed hierarchical clustering procedure for symbolic data to the coauthorship structure of scientific disciplines. To track temporal changes, we divided data for the period 1986-2010 into five 5-year time periods. The clusters of disciplines for the Slovene science system revealed 5 clusters of scientific disciplines that, in large measure, correspond with the official national classification of sciences. However, there were also some significant differences pointing to the need for a dynamic classification system of sciences to better characterize them. Implications stemming from these results, especially with regard to classifying scientific disciplines, understanding the collaborative structure of science, and research and development policies, are discussed.
- Date
- 21. 1.2015 14:55:22
- Type
- a
-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.04
0.035731133 = sum of:
0.004373322 = product of:
0.039359897 = sum of:
0.039359897 = weight(_text_:p in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039359897 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.03135781 = sum of:
0.004957605 = weight(_text_:a in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004957605 = score(doc=402,freq=6.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.026400207 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026400207 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
- Type
- a
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.04
0.035522755 = product of:
0.07104551 = sum of:
0.07104551 = sum of:
0.009445025 = weight(_text_:a in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009445025 = score(doc=6902,freq=4.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.061600484 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061600484 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
- Type
- a
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990)
0.04
0.035522755 = product of:
0.07104551 = sum of:
0.07104551 = sum of:
0.009445025 = weight(_text_:a in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009445025 = score(doc=4689,freq=4.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.061600484 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061600484 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:55
- Type
- a
-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.04
0.03524428 = product of:
0.07048856 = sum of:
0.07048856 = sum of:
0.008262675 = weight(_text_:a in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008262675 = score(doc=3690,freq=6.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.062225886 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062225886 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Derives a 'literature variable exponential growth model' from Price's literature growth model. The research shows that the new model is more convincing than the former ones. Gives detailed calculation procedure, examples, parameter values and mean square errors
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
- Type
- a
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.03
0.03354048 = sum of:
0.0030924056 = product of:
0.02783165 = sum of:
0.02783165 = weight(_text_:p in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783165 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.030448074 = sum of:
0.0040478674 = weight(_text_:a in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0040478674 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.026400207 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026400207 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
- Abstract
- Patent analysis has become important for management as it offers timely and valuable information to evaluate R&D performance and identify the prospects of patents. This study explores the scattering patterns of patent impact based on citations in 3 distinct technological areas, the liquid crystal, semiconductor, and drug technological areas, to identify the core patents in each area. The research follows the approach from Bradford's law, which equally divides total citations into 3 zones. While the result suggests that the scattering of patent citations corresponded with features of Bradford's law, the proportion of patents in the 3 zones did not match the proportion as proposed by the law. As a result, the study shows that the distributions of citations in all 3 areas were more concentrated than what Bradford's law proposed. The Groos (1967) droop was also presented by the scattering of patent citations, and the growth rate of cumulative citation decreased in the third zone.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
- Type
- a
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.03
0.03349817 = product of:
0.06699634 = sum of:
0.06699634 = sum of:
0.0047704573 = weight(_text_:a in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047704573 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.062225886 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062225886 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
- Type
- a
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.03
0.032354888 = sum of:
0.0030924056 = product of:
0.02783165 = sum of:
0.02783165 = weight(_text_:p in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783165 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.029262481 = sum of:
0.0028622746 = weight(_text_:a in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0028622746 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.026400207 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026400207 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
- Type
- a
-
Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023)
0.03
0.030419772 = sum of:
0.0025770047 = product of:
0.023193043 = sum of:
0.023193043 = weight(_text_:p in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193043 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.027842768 = sum of:
0.0058425935 = weight(_text_:a in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058425935 = score(doc=998,freq=12.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.022000173 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022000173 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
- Abstract
- The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:15:06
- Type
- a
-
Costas, R.; Zahedi, Z.; Wouters, P.: ¬The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media : large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations (2015)
0.03
0.029910712 = sum of:
0.0025770047 = product of:
0.023193043 = sum of:
0.023193043 = weight(_text_:p in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193043 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.027333707 = sum of:
0.005333534 = weight(_text_:a in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005333534 = score(doc=2598,freq=10.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
0.022000173 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022000173 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the disciplinary orientation of scientific publications that were mentioned on different social media platforms, focussing on their differences and similarities with citation counts. Design/methodology/approach - Social media metrics and readership counts, associated with 500,216 publications and their citation data from the Web of Science database, were collected from Altmetric.com and Mendeley. Results are presented through descriptive statistical analyses together with science maps generated with VOSviewer. Findings - The results confirm Mendeley as the most prevalent social media source with similar characteristics to citations in their distribution across fields and their density in average values per publication. The humanities, natural sciences, and engineering disciplines have a much lower presence of social media metrics. Twitter has a stronger focus on general medicine and social sciences. Other sources (blog, Facebook, Google+, and news media mentions) are more prominent in regards to multidisciplinary journals. Originality/value - This paper reinforces the relevance of Mendeley as a social media source for analytical purposes from a disciplinary perspective, being particularly relevant for the social sciences (together with Twitter). Key implications for the use of social media metrics on the evaluation of research performance (e.g. the concentration of some social media metrics, such as blogs, news items, etc., around multidisciplinary journals) are identified.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Type
- a
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.03
0.029262481 = product of:
0.058524963 = sum of:
0.058524963 = sum of:
0.0057245493 = weight(_text_:a in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0057245493 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.052800413 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052800413 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
- Type
- a
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.03
0.029262481 = product of:
0.058524963 = sum of:
0.058524963 = sum of:
0.0057245493 = weight(_text_:a in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0057245493 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.052800413 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052800413 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
- Type
- a
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012)
0.03
0.028708516 = sum of:
0.0025770047 = product of:
0.023193043 = sum of:
0.023193043 = weight(_text_:p in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193043 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.02613151 = sum of:
0.0041313376 = weight(_text_:a in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041313376 = score(doc=57,freq=6.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.022000173 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022000173 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
- Abstract
- Webometric network analyses have been used to map the connectivity of groups of websites to identify clusters, important sites or overall structure. Such analyses have mainly been based upon hyperlink counts, the number of hyperlinks between a pair of websites, although some have used title mentions or URL citations instead. The ability to automatically gather hyperlink counts from Yahoo! ceased in April 2011 and the ability to manually gather such counts was due to cease by early 2012, creating a need for alternatives. This article assesses URL citations and title mentions as possible replacements for hyperlinks in both binary and weighted direct link and co-inlink network diagrams. It also assesses three different types of data for the network connections: hit count estimates, counts of matching URLs, and filtered counts of matching URLs. Results from analyses of U.S. library and information science departments and U.K. universities give evidence that metrics based upon URLs or titles can be appropriate replacements for metrics based upon hyperlinks for both binary and weighted networks, although filtered counts of matching URLs are necessary to give the best results for co-title mention and co-URL citation network diagrams.
- Date
- 6. 4.2012 18:16:22
- Type
- a
-
Heneberg, P.: Supposedly uncited articles of Nobel laureates and Fields medalists can be prevalently attributed to the errors of omission and commission (2013)
0.03
0.028708516 = sum of:
0.0025770047 = product of:
0.023193043 = sum of:
0.023193043 = weight(_text_:p in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193043 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.02613151 = sum of:
0.0041313376 = weight(_text_:a in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041313376 = score(doc=660,freq=6.0), product of:
0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
0.022000173 = weight(_text_:22 in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022000173 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03247589 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
- Abstract
- Several independent authors reported a high share of uncited publications, which include those produced by top scientists. This share was repeatedly reported to exceed 10% of the total papers produced, without any explanation of this phenomenon and the lack of difference in uncitedness between average and successful researchers. In this report, we analyze the uncitedness among two independent groups of highly visible scientists (mathematicians represented by Fields medalists, and researchers in physiology or medicine represented by Nobel Prize laureates in the respective field). Analysis of both groups led to the identical conclusion: over 90% of the uncited database records of highly visible scientists can be explained by the inclusion of editorial materials progress reports presented at international meetings (meeting abstracts), discussion items (letters to the editor, discussion), personalia (biographic items), and by errors of omission and commission of the Web of Science (WoS) database and of the citing documents. Only a marginal amount of original articles and reviews were found to be uncited (0.9 and 0.3%, respectively), which is in strong contrast with the previously reported data, which never addressed the document types among the uncited records.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:21:46
- Type
- a
