Search (109 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.02
    0.021416504 = product of:
      0.042833008 = sum of:
        0.042833008 = sum of:
          0.007632732 = weight(_text_:a in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007632732 = score(doc=7701,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.035200275 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035200275 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
    Type
    a
  2. Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000) 0.02
    0.01950832 = product of:
      0.03901664 = sum of:
        0.03901664 = sum of:
          0.003816366 = weight(_text_:a in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003816366 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.035200275 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035200275 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 17:48:06
    Type
    a
  3. Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001) 0.02
    0.01950832 = product of:
      0.03901664 = sum of:
        0.03901664 = sum of:
          0.003816366 = weight(_text_:a in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003816366 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
          0.035200275 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035200275 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2001 12:22:31
    Type
    a
  4. Dambeck, H.; Engler, T.: Gesucht und gefunden : Neun Volltext-Suchprogramme für den Desktop (2002) 0.02
    0.01950832 = product of:
      0.03901664 = sum of:
        0.03901664 = sum of:
          0.003816366 = weight(_text_:a in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003816366 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
          0.035200275 = weight(_text_:22 in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035200275 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    c't. 2002, H.22, S.190-197
    Type
    a
  5. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.02
    0.015224037 = product of:
      0.030448074 = sum of:
        0.030448074 = sum of:
          0.0040478674 = weight(_text_:a in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0040478674 = score(doc=3564,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.026400207 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026400207 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11372503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
  6. Markey, K.; Atherton, P.; Newton, C.: ¬An analysis of controlled vocabulary and free text search statements in online searches (1980) 0.01
    0.010554933 = sum of:
      0.0072156126 = product of:
        0.06494051 = sum of:
          0.06494051 = weight(_text_:p in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06494051 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
        0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
      0.0033393202 = product of:
        0.0066786404 = sum of:
          0.0066786404 = weight(_text_:a in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0066786404 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  7. Kirkbride, P.: Full text, free text, and controlled vocabulary : strategic search planning (1991) 0.01
    0.010554933 = sum of:
      0.0072156126 = product of:
        0.06494051 = sum of:
          0.06494051 = weight(_text_:p in 2941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06494051 = score(doc=2941,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 2941, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2941)
        0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
      0.0033393202 = product of:
        0.0066786404 = sum of:
          0.0066786404 = weight(_text_:a in 2941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0066786404 = score(doc=2941,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2941, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2941)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Mallinson, P.: Developments in free text retrieval systems (1993) 0.01
    0.008527232 = sum of:
      0.0051540094 = product of:
        0.046386085 = sum of:
          0.046386085 = weight(_text_:p in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046386085 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
        0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
      0.0033732231 = product of:
        0.0067464462 = sum of:
          0.0067464462 = weight(_text_:a in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0067464462 = score(doc=4931,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a typical traditional 1989 free text system and discusses developments in data storage, in search strategy and in the storage and retrieval of real time data. Outlines the following areas in which free text systems are likely to develop: standards; integration; dynamic data exchange; improved user interfaces; and better retrieval methods
    Type
    a
  9. Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996) 0.01
    0.0068770368 = sum of:
      0.0025770047 = product of:
        0.023193043 = sum of:
          0.023193043 = weight(_text_:p in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023193043 = score(doc=4214,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
        0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
      0.0043000323 = product of:
        0.008600065 = sum of:
          0.008600065 = weight(_text_:a in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008600065 = score(doc=4214,freq=26.0), product of:
              0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.22966442 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
                5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                  26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An important stage in the process or retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objects; this operation is often undertaken manually, just as index terms are often manually assigned to documents in a conventional retrieval system. In an earlier article (1994), the results were published of a study in which several different sets of links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full-text documents. These results showed little similarity between the link-sets, a finding that was comparable with those of studies of inter-indexer consistency, which suggest that there is generally only a low level of agreement between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by different indexers. In this article, a description is provided of an investigation into the nature of the relationship existing between (i) the levels of inter-linker consistency obtaining among the group of hypertext databases used in our earlier experiments, and (ii) the levels of effectiveness of a number of searches carried out in those databases. An account is given of the implementation of the searches and of the methods used in the calculation of numerical values expressing their effectiveness. Analysis of the results of a comparison between recorded levels of consistency and those of effectiveness does not allow us to draw conclusions about the consistency - effectiveness relationship that are equivalent to those drawn in comparable studies of inter-indexer consistency
    Type
    a
  10. Muddamalle, M.R.: Natural language versus controlled vocabulary in information retrieval : a case study in soil mechanics (1998) 0.01
    0.0065979613 = sum of:
      0.0030924056 = product of:
        0.02783165 = sum of:
          0.02783165 = weight(_text_:p in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02783165 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
        0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
      0.003505556 = product of:
        0.007011112 = sum of:
          0.007011112 = weight(_text_:a in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007011112 = score(doc=1795,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The effectiveness ot two information retrieval tools, namely, thesaurus and natural language, in an information retrieval system has been studies. A database SOILSC was created using a HP3000/58 series minicomputer and MINISIS software. Records of articles totalling 17.918 published in various journals, received in the Central Water and Power Research Station (CWPRS) library (Pune, India) since 1988, have been stored. The information needs of a soil mechanics group have been formulated using thesaurus and natural language into 81 search strategies. In consultation with the user, relevance of the retrieved documents was assessed and, recall (R) and precision (P) values were calculated. Since both thesaurus and natural language have shown identical performance in information retrieval, a combination of these two have been suggested for making searches and providing relevant information
    Type
    a
  11. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2017) 0.01
    0.0065324595 = sum of:
      0.0025770047 = product of:
        0.023193043 = sum of:
          0.023193043 = weight(_text_:p in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023193043 = score(doc=3868,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
        0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
      0.0039554546 = product of:
        0.007910909 = sum of:
          0.007910909 = weight(_text_:a in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007910909 = score(doc=3868,freq=22.0), product of:
              0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.21126054 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
                4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                  22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This paper reports on an analysis of the loss levels that would result if a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI), were missing the subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by its professional indexers, employing the methodology developed by Gross and Taylor (2005), and later by Gross et al. (2015). The results indicate that AEI users would lose a similar proportion of hits per query to that experienced by library catalog users: on average, 27% of the resources found by a sample of keyword queries on the AEI database would not have been found without the subject indexing, based on the Australian Thesaurus of Education Descriptors (ATED). The paper also discusses the methodological limitations of these studies, pointing out that real-life users might still find some of the resources missed by a particular query through follow-up searches, while additional resources might also be found through iterative searching on the subject vocabulary. The paper goes on to describe a new research design, based on a before - and - after experiment, which addresses some of these limitations. It is argued that this alternative design will provide a more realistic picture of the value that professionally assigned subject indexing and controlled subject vocabularies can add to literature searching of a more scholarly and thorough kind.
    Type
    a
  12. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2018) 0.01
    0.0061548483 = sum of:
      0.0025770047 = product of:
        0.023193043 = sum of:
          0.023193043 = weight(_text_:p in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023193043 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
        0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
      0.0035778433 = product of:
        0.0071556866 = sum of:
          0.0071556866 = weight(_text_:a in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0071556866 = score(doc=4300,freq=18.0), product of:
              0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
                4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                  18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This article reports on an investigation of the search value that subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by professional indexers add to a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI). First, a similar methodology to that developed by Gross et al. (2015) was applied, with keyword searches representing a range of educational topics run on the AEI database with and without its subject indexing. The results indicated that AEI users would also lose, on average, about a quarter of hits per query. Second, an alternative research design was applied in which an experienced literature searcher was asked to find resources on a set of educational topics on an AEI database stripped of its subject indexing and then asked to search for additional resources on the same topics after the subject indexing had been reinserted. In this study, the proportion of additional resources that would have been lost had it not been for the subject indexing was again found to be about a quarter of the total resources found for each topic, on average.
    Type
    a
  13. Blake, P.: Leading edge : Verity keeps it in the family (1997) 0.01
    0.0051163393 = sum of:
      0.0030924056 = product of:
        0.02783165 = sum of:
          0.02783165 = weight(_text_:p in 7398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02783165 = score(doc=7398,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.116767466 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 7398, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7398)
        0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
      0.0020239337 = product of:
        0.0040478674 = sum of:
          0.0040478674 = weight(_text_:a in 7398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0040478674 = score(doc=7398,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03247589 = queryNorm
              0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 7398, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7398)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Verity Search 97 software will index and search e-mail, attachments, folders and documents on local and network disk drives. The Internet may be searched via the same front end and changes to particular documents or pages may be monitored. Documents may be viewed in their native formats including ASCII, HTML, PDF and popular word processors, with highlighted search terms. Agents may be launched into the Internet to retrieve information according to a user-specified profile. The software can index about 700 MB an hour. Describes the search technology which includes fuzzy logic and natural language. The Web version of Personal Search 97 works with Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer, while the Exchange version will work regardless of any attachment to an Exchange server. Search 97 Personal improves online time and access time and allows searches to be refined offline
    Type
    a
  14. Kristensen, J.; Järvelin, K.: ¬The effectiveness of a searching thesaurus in free-text searching in a full-text database (1990) 0.00
    0.00330507 = product of:
      0.00661014 = sum of:
        0.00661014 = product of:
          0.01322028 = sum of:
            0.01322028 = weight(_text_:a in 2043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01322028 = score(doc=2043,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03247589 = queryNorm
                0.3530471 = fieldWeight in 2043, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2043)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  15. Bernstein, L.M.; Williamson, R.E.: Testing of a natural language retrieval system for a full text knowledge base (1984) 0.00
    0.0028919363 = product of:
      0.0057838727 = sum of:
        0.0057838727 = product of:
          0.011567745 = sum of:
            0.011567745 = weight(_text_:a in 1803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011567745 = score(doc=1803,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03247589 = queryNorm
                0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 1803, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1803)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  16. Marcus, J.: Everyone's a futurist : full text year in review - 1994 (1994) 0.00
    0.0026985784 = product of:
      0.005397157 = sum of:
        0.005397157 = product of:
          0.010794314 = sum of:
            0.010794314 = weight(_text_:a in 2126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010794314 = score(doc=2126,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03247589 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 2126, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  17. Kristensen, J.: Expanding end-users' query statements for free text searching with a search-aid thesaurus (1993) 0.00
    0.0025242888 = product of:
      0.0050485777 = sum of:
        0.0050485777 = product of:
          0.010097155 = sum of:
            0.010097155 = weight(_text_:a in 6621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010097155 = score(doc=6621,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03247589 = queryNorm
                0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 6621, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6621)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Tests the effectiveness of a thesaurus as a search-aid in free text searching of a full text database. A set of queries was searched against a large full text database of newspaper articles. The thesaurus contained equivalence, hierarchical and associative relationships. Each query was searched in five modes: basic search, synonym search, narrower term search, related term search, and union of all previous searches. The searches were analyzed in terms of relative recall and precision
    Type
    a
  18. White, F.: ISYS 3.01 : a review (1993) 0.00
    0.0025242888 = product of:
      0.0050485777 = sum of:
        0.0050485777 = product of:
          0.010097155 = sum of:
            0.010097155 = weight(_text_:a in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010097155 = score(doc=2052,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03247589 = queryNorm
                0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews ISYS, a full text retrieval system from Odyssey developments. ISYS supports a wide variety of wordprocessor, text and spreadsheet formats. A programming interface is included for developers to integrate ISYS into their own applications. Describes how to use ISYS to create a database index for a set of documents and then query that index to locate, retrieve and display information from the indexed documents. Discusses configuration options, precedence of operators, displaying and manipulating search results, the advanced menu, ease of learning and use, documentation and library applications
    Type
    a
  19. Tenopir, C.: Full text database retrieval performance (1985) 0.00
    0.0023852286 = product of:
      0.0047704573 = sum of:
        0.0047704573 = product of:
          0.009540915 = sum of:
            0.009540915 = weight(_text_:a in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009540915 = score(doc=406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03247589 = queryNorm
                0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  20. Ojala, M.: Research into full-text retrieval (1990) 0.00
    0.0023852286 = product of:
      0.0047704573 = sum of:
        0.0047704573 = product of:
          0.009540915 = sum of:
            0.009540915 = weight(_text_:a in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009540915 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.037446223 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03247589 = queryNorm
                0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 106
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…