Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.02
0.02356836 = product of:
0.04713672 = sum of:
0.04713672 = sum of:
0.0062665115 = weight(_text_:a in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062665115 = score(doc=7242,freq=4.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.04087021 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04087021 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a comparative study of 3 classification schemes: LCC, DDC and NLM Classification to determine their effectiveness in classifying materials on health insurance. Examined 2 hypotheses: that there would be no differences in the scatter of the 3 classification schemes; and that there would be overlap between all 3 schemes but no difference in the classes into which the subject was placed. There was subject scatter in all 3 classification schemes and litlle overlap between the 3 systems
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
- Type
- a
