Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- author's%3a%22G%c3%baker%2c A.%22 2
- author's%3a%22G%c3%biker%2c A.%22 2
- authors%3a%22G%c3%baker%2c A.%22 2
- author's%3a%22G%c3%böker%2c A.%22 2
- authors%3a%22G%c3%biker%2c A.%22 2
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.05
0.0453013 = product of: 0.0906026 = sum of: 0.0906026 = sum of: 0.008862185 = weight(_text_:a in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.008862185 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of: 0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.037706986 = queryNorm 0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091) 0.08174042 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.08174042 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of: 0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of: 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.037706986 = queryNorm 0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Type
- a
-
Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002)
0.00
0.002477056 = product of: 0.004954112 = sum of: 0.004954112 = product of: 0.009908224 = sum of: 0.009908224 = weight(_text_:a in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.009908224 = score(doc=3765,freq=10.0), product of: 0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.037706986 = queryNorm 0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of: 3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of: 10.0 = termFreq=10.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
- Type
- a