Search (250 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Cox, R.J.: Access in the digital information age and the archival mission : the United States (1998) 0.04 
    0.03963864 = product of:
  0.07927728 = sum of:
    0.07927728 = sum of:
      0.007754412 = weight(_text_:a in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007754412 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
      0.07152286 = weight(_text_:22 in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07152286 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    2. 3.1999 9:22:24
    Type
    a
  2. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.03 
    0.034644227 = sum of:
  0.029944343 = product of:
    0.17966606 = sum of:
      0.17966606 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17966606 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31968024 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  0.0046998835 = product of:
    0.009399767 = sum of:
      0.009399767 = weight(_text_:a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009399767 = score(doc=2918,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
    Type
    a
  3. Rosman, G.; Meer, K.v.d.; Sol, H.G.: ¬The design of document information systems (1996) 0.03 
    0.031082746 = product of:
  0.06216549 = sum of:
    0.06216549 = sum of:
      0.011077731 = weight(_text_:a in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011077731 = score(doc=7750,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
      0.05108776 = weight(_text_:22 in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05108776 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Discusses the costs and benefits of documents information systems (involving text and images) and some design methodological aspects that arise from the documentary nature of the data. Reports details of a case study involving a specific document information system introduced at Press Ltd, a company in the Netherlands
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.4, S.287-297
    Type
    a
  4. Martin, P.; Vaillant, S.: ¬Le records management : Concept nouveau? Pratique ancienne? (1998) 0.03 
    0.029164357 = product of:
  0.058328714 = sum of:
    0.058328714 = sum of:
      0.007754412 = weight(_text_:a in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007754412 = score(doc=2430,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
      0.050574303 = weight(_text_:22 in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050574303 = score(doc=2430,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Records management has appeared lately in France to designate the management of organizational documents and electronic data an enterprise must retain as proof of its activities and transactions. An international standard is under discussion to address issues concerned with retention. At the same time, some information professionals are finding themselves increasingly involved with active company records, since the role of records manager requires skills found in the professions of archivists, information scientist and quality controller. Presents examples which pose the question, is records management in fact a new profession or simply a new form of a familiar job?
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    31.12.1998 15:32:22
    Type
    a
  5. Barbat, P.; Neste, E. van den; Drouhet, G.: Records management et archivistique française (1998) 0.03 
    0.02864491 = product of:
  0.05728982 = sum of:
    0.05728982 = sum of:
      0.006715518 = weight(_text_:a in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.006715518 = score(doc=2988,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
      0.050574303 = weight(_text_:22 in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050574303 = score(doc=2988,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    An article in documentaliste 35(1998) no.1, presented the concept and contexts for the application of records management. This article, devoted to the experience of archivists, continues to focus on professional active and semi-active records management practices and their evolution in different countries and eras. P. Barbat analyzes the discovery in France in the 1960s of active records and the invlovement of both archivists and the departments actually generating the records in their management, and the impact this development has had on archival practices. Also discusses the impact that the international standard now being drafted by ISO will have on the profession. A government and a company archivist also describe their experience
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    21. 2.1999 15:22:35
    Type
    a
  6. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.03 
    0.028313313 = product of:
  0.056626625 = sum of:
    0.056626625 = sum of:
      0.0055388655 = weight(_text_:a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0055388655 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.05108776 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05108776 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
    Type
    a
  7. Boyle, J.: ¬A blueprint for managing documents (1997) 0.03 
    0.025389217 = product of:
  0.050778434 = sum of:
    0.050778434 = sum of:
      0.009908224 = weight(_text_:a in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009908224 = score(doc=814,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
      0.04087021 = weight(_text_:22 in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04087021 = score(doc=814,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Electronic document management systems are a collection of 3 complementary technologies: the repository, the workflow engine and the searching-and-indexing technology. The document repository stores, controls and manages documents. Workflow can eliminate the dead time a document spends in transition between works and integrates with the repository and electronic mail system. Search and indexing technology enables more efficient searching than standard full text technologies by configuring searches to specific attributes. Discusses how the technologies can be combined to manage a WWW site and offers advice on choosing an appropriate solution
    Source
    Byte. 22(1997) no.5, S.75-76,78,80
    Type
    a
  8. Gonzalez, A.C.: Analisis y diseno de sistemas de gestion electronica de documentacion en grandes entidades (1997) 0.03 
    0.025389217 = product of:
  0.050778434 = sum of:
    0.050778434 = sum of:
      0.009908224 = weight(_text_:a in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009908224 = score(doc=2923,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
      0.04087021 = weight(_text_:22 in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04087021 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The successful implementation of Electronic Document Management Systems (EDMS) requires a previous design based on a methodology that includes key steps as follows: capture of critical information and analysis of the current document situation: functional and/or technical options that involve the treatment of the document fonds considered; document management applications design (data, text, images, audio, video) under a functional, technical and economic focus; global and modular project defined as a strategic EDMS plan
    Date
    11. 2.1999 21:02:22
    Type
    a
  9. Heijst, A.L.M. v.: Records management : the art of making choices (1995) 0.02 
    0.02356836 = product of:
  0.04713672 = sum of:
    0.04713672 = sum of:
      0.0062665115 = weight(_text_:a in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0062665115 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
      0.04087021 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04087021 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Discusses the problems associated with electronic archiving and draws attention to work by the University of Pittsburgh on developing a standard for archiving electronic documents. Examines elements of effective archival and records management and considers the problems associated with archives such as backlogs and time taken to search for information. The basis of good records management lies in making responsible choices
    Date
    22. 2.1996 9:30:18
    Type
    a
  10. McLeod, J.; Hare, C.H.; Webster, B.: Records management today (1998) 0.02 
    0.02265065 = product of:
  0.0453013 = sum of:
    0.0453013 = sum of:
      0.0044310926 = weight(_text_:a in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0044310926 = score(doc=3627,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
      0.04087021 = weight(_text_:22 in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04087021 = score(doc=3627,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    15. 5.1999 20:22:49
    Type
    a
  11. Taylor, P.: Perception and change in records management : rethinking the fundamentals (1997) 0.02 
    0.021238474 = product of:
  0.04247695 = sum of:
    0.04247695 = sum of:
      0.006715518 = weight(_text_:a in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.006715518 = score(doc=2787,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
      0.03576143 = weight(_text_:22 in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03576143 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Identifies some of the fundamental issues for the future records management, and assesses their relevance for the future. Considers traditional records management and suggests a new record keeping approach which impacts directly upon the organization by ensuring records are properly created according to the organization's needs. Stresses the importance of making better use of new technologies. Important issues are: the myth of the information manager, implementation of records management standards, replacing the life cycle approach with one of a records continuum, new relationships between the archival and records management community, and development of competency based standards
    Date
    24. 1.1999 12:22:46
    Type
    a
  12. Hare, C.E.; McLeaod, J.; King, L.A.: Continuing professional development for the information discipline of records management : pt.1: context and initial indications of current activities (1996) 0.02 
    0.020622315 = product of:
  0.04124463 = sum of:
    0.04124463 = sum of:
      0.0054831975 = weight(_text_:a in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0054831975 = score(doc=5049,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
      0.03576143 = weight(_text_:22 in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03576143 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Explores the newly emerging information discipline of records management, focusing on its current status in the UK where it is represented by a range of sector specific and general organizations for information professionals. While records management involves some skills and knowledge which are different from those already mastered by library and information professionals, there are significant overlaps in terms of cataloguing, classification, indexing, identifying and meeting user needs and the challenge of dealing with information in electronic form. Concludes that, in the changing and sometimes shrinking market of of some of the more traditional library sectors, records management may offer the opportunity for information professionals to develop or shift their career path while remaining within the discipline of information management
    Source
    Librarian career development. 4(1996) no.2, S.22-27
    Type
    a
  13. Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997) 0.02 
    0.020622315 = product of:
  0.04124463 = sum of:
    0.04124463 = sum of:
      0.0054831975 = weight(_text_:a in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0054831975 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.03576143 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03576143 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Type
    a
  14. Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996) 0.02 
    0.020435104 = product of:
  0.04087021 = sum of:
    0.04087021 = product of:
      0.08174042 = sum of:
        0.08174042 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08174042 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:46:30
  15. ¬Das papierlose Archiv : Abspecken mit digitaler Speicherverwaltung (1995) 0.02 
    0.01981932 = product of:
  0.03963864 = sum of:
    0.03963864 = sum of:
      0.003877206 = weight(_text_:a in 1788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.003877206 = score(doc=1788,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1788, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1788)
      0.03576143 = weight(_text_:22 in 1788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03576143 = score(doc=1788,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1788, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1788)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Facts: Testmagazin für die Büro- & Kommunikationswelt. 1995, H.5, S.22-34
    Type
    a
  16. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.02 
    0.01981932 = product of:
  0.03963864 = sum of:
    0.03963864 = sum of:
      0.003877206 = weight(_text_:a in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.003877206 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.03576143 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03576143 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Type
    a
  17. Electronic recordkeeping issues and perspectives (1994) 0.02 
    0.015326328 = product of:
  0.030652655 = sum of:
    0.030652655 = product of:
      0.06130531 = sum of:
        0.06130531 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06130531 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.14-135
  18. Jervis, M.; Masoodian, M.: How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents? (2014) 0.02 
    0.0151703395 = product of:
  0.030340679 = sum of:
    0.030340679 = sum of:
      0.004796799 = weight(_text_:a in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004796799 = score(doc=1632,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.02554388 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02554388 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Type
    a
  19. Hesselbarth, A.: What you see is all you get? : Konzept zur Optimierung des Bildmanagements am Beispiel der jump Fotoagentur (2008) 0.01 
    0.014156656 = product of:
  0.028313313 = sum of:
    0.028313313 = sum of:
      0.0027694327 = weight(_text_:a in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0027694327 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
      0.02554388 = weight(_text_:22 in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02554388 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 17:34:12
  20. Toebak, P.: ¬Das Dossier nicht die Klassifikation als Herzstück des Records Management (2009) 0.01 
    0.014156656 = product of:
  0.028313313 = sum of:
    0.028313313 = sum of:
      0.0027694327 = weight(_text_:a in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0027694327 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
      0.02554388 = weight(_text_:22 in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02554388 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037706986 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6.12.2009 17:22:17
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 150
  • d 92
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 232
  • m 11
  • s 4
  • el 2
  • r 2
  • b 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications