Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  • × author_ss:"Olson, H.A."
  1. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.02
    0.021238474 = product of:
      0.04247695 = sum of:
        0.04247695 = sum of:
          0.006715518 = weight(_text_:a in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.006715518 = score(doc=166,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.037706986 = queryNorm
              0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.03576143 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03576143 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13204344 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.037706986 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The idea of sameness is used to gather material in classifications. However, it is also used to separate what is different. Sameness and difference as guiding principles of classification seem obvious but are actually fundamental characteristics specifically related to Western culture. Sameness is not a singular factor, but has the potential to represent multiple characteristics or facets. This article explores the ramifications of which characteristics are used to define classifications and in what order. It explains the primacy of division by discipline, its origins in Western philosophy, and the cultural specificity that results. The Dewey Decimal Classification is used as an example throughout.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  2. Kublik, A.; Clevette, V.; Ward, D.; Olson, H.A.: Adapting dominant classifications to particular contexts (2003) 0.00
    0.0023499418 = product of:
      0.0046998835 = sum of:
        0.0046998835 = product of:
          0.009399767 = sum of:
            0.009399767 = weight(_text_:a in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009399767 = score(doc=5516,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper addresses the process of adapting to a particular culture or context a classification that has grown out of western culture to become a global standard. The authors use a project that adapts DDC for use in a feminist/women's issues context to demonstrate an approach that works. The project is particularly useful as an interdisciplinary example. Discussion consists of four parts: (1) definition of the problem indicating the need for adaptation and efforts to date; (2) description of the methodology developed for creating an expansion; (3) description of the interface developed for actually doing the work, with its potential for a distributed group to work on it together (could even be internationally distributed); and (4) generalization of how the methodology could be used for particular contexts by country, ethnicity, perspective or other defining factors.
    Type
    a
  3. Olson, H.A.: Wind and rain and dark of night : classification in scientific discourse communities (2008) 0.00
    0.0018577921 = product of:
      0.0037155843 = sum of:
        0.0037155843 = product of:
          0.0074311686 = sum of:
            0.0074311686 = weight(_text_:a in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0074311686 = score(doc=2270,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Classifications of natural phenomena demonstrate the applicability of discourse analysis in finding the importance of concepts such as warrant for categorization and classification. Temperature scales provide a body of official literature for close consideration. Official documents of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) reveal the reasoning behind choices affecting these standards. A more cursory scrutiny of the Saffir-Simpson Scale through scholarly publications and documentation from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (KIST) indicates the potential of this form of analysis. The same holds true for an examination of the definition of what is a planet as determined by the International Astronomical Union. As Sayers, Richardson, and Bliss have indicated, there seem to be principles and a reliance on context that bridge the differences between natural and artificial, scientific and bibliographic classifications.
    Type
    a
  4. Olson, H.A.: ¬The ubiquitous hierarchy : an army to overcome the threat of a mob (2004) 0.00
    0.0015666279 = product of:
      0.0031332558 = sum of:
        0.0031332558 = product of:
          0.0062665115 = sum of:
            0.0062665115 = weight(_text_:a in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0062665115 = score(doc=833,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  5. Olson, H.A.: Cultural discourse of classification : indigeous alternatives to the tradition of Aristotle, Durkheim, and Foucault (2001) 0.00
    9.693015E-4 = product of:
      0.001938603 = sum of:
        0.001938603 = product of:
          0.003877206 = sum of:
            0.003877206 = weight(_text_:a in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003877206 = score(doc=1594,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a