-
Bates, M.J.: Subject access in online catalogs: a design model (1986)
0.00
0.0027415988 = product of:
0.0054831975 = sum of:
0.0054831975 = product of:
0.010966395 = sum of:
0.010966395 = weight(_text_:a in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010966395 = score(doc=120,freq=4.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Rethinking subject cataloging in the online environment (1989)
0.00
0.0022155463 = product of:
0.0044310926 = sum of:
0.0044310926 = product of:
0.008862185 = sum of:
0.008862185 = weight(_text_:a in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008862185 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.00
0.0021674242 = product of:
0.0043348484 = sum of:
0.0043348484 = product of:
0.008669697 = sum of:
0.008669697 = weight(_text_:a in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008669697 = score(doc=2883,freq=10.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.00
0.0021674242 = product of:
0.0043348484 = sum of:
0.0043348484 = product of:
0.008669697 = sum of:
0.008669697 = weight(_text_:a in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008669697 = score(doc=207,freq=10.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
- Type
- a
