-
Machado, L.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Barcellos Almeida, M.; Borges, M.M.: Towards a moderate realistic foundation for ontological knowledge organization systems : the question of the naturalness of classifications (2023)
0.00
0.0024924895 = product of:
0.004984979 = sum of:
0.004984979 = product of:
0.009969958 = sum of:
0.009969958 = weight(_text_:a in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009969958 = score(doc=894,freq=18.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Several authors emphasize the need for a change in classification theory due to the influence of a dogmatic and monistic ontology supported by an outdated essentialism. These claims tend to focus on the fallibility of knowledge, the need for a pluralistic view, and the theoretical burden of observations. Regardless of the legitimacy of these concerns, there is the risk, when not moderate, to fall into the opposite relativistic extreme. Based on a narrative review of the literature, we aim to reflectively discuss the theoretical foundations that can serve as a basis for a realist position supporting pluralistic ontological classifications. The goal is to show that, against rather conventional solutions, objective scientific-based approaches to natural classifications are presented to be viable, allowing a proper distinction between ontological and taxonomic questions. Supported by critical scientific realism, we consider that such an approach is suitable for the development of ontological Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS). We believe that ontological perspectivism can provide the necessary adaptation to the different granularities of reality.
- Type
- a
-
Bergman, M.K..: Hierarchy in knowledge systems (2022)
0.00
0.0016959244 = product of:
0.0033918489 = sum of:
0.0033918489 = product of:
0.0067836978 = sum of:
0.0067836978 = weight(_text_:a in 1099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067836978 = score(doc=1099,freq=12.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 1099, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1099)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Hierarchies abound to help us organize our world. A hierarchy places items into a general order, where more 'general' is also more 'abstract'. The etymology of hierarchy is grounded in notions of religious and social rank. This article, after a historical review, focuses on knowledge systems, an interloper of the term hierarchy since at least the 1800s. Hierarchies in knowledge systems include taxonomies, classification systems, or thesauri in information science, and systems for representing information and knowledge to computers, notably ontologies and knowledge representation languages. Hierarchies are the logical underpinning of inference and reasoning in these systems, as well as the scaffolding for classification and inheritance. Hierarchies in knowledge systems express subsumption relations that have flexible variants, which we can represent algorithmically, and thus computationally. This article dissects that variability, leading to a proposed typology of hierarchies useful to knowledge systems. The article argues through a perspective informed by Charles Peirce that natural hierarchies are real, can be logically determined, and are the appropriate basis for knowledge systems. Description logics and semantic language standards reflect this perspective, importantly through their open-world logic and vocabularies for generalized subsumption hierarchies. Recent research suggests possible mechanisms for the emergence of natural hierarchies.
- Type
- a
-
Restrepo, G.: Zeit für eine neue Ordnung? (2022)
0.00
0.0013847164 = product of:
0.0027694327 = sum of:
0.0027694327 = product of:
0.0055388655 = sum of:
0.0055388655 = weight(_text_:a in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055388655 = score(doc=361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Franz, S.; Lopatka, T.; Kunze, G.; Meyn, N.; Strupler, N.: Un/Doing Classification : Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme zwischen Universalitätsanspruch und reduktionistischer Wissensorganisation (2022)
0.00
0.0011077732 = product of:
0.0022155463 = sum of:
0.0022155463 = product of:
0.0044310926 = sum of:
0.0044310926 = weight(_text_:a in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044310926 = score(doc=675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Kleineberg, M.: Klassifikation (2023)
0.00
9.693015E-4 = product of:
0.001938603 = sum of:
0.001938603 = product of:
0.003877206 = sum of:
0.003877206 = weight(_text_:a in 783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003877206 = score(doc=783,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 783, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=783)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
