-
Egghe, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Salton's cosine measure (2009)
0.01
0.0068012597 = product of:
0.013602519 = sum of:
0.013602519 = product of:
0.027205039 = sum of:
0.027205039 = weight(_text_:r in 2803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027205039 = score(doc=2803,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2803, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2803)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.: Influence of adding or deleting items and sources on the h-index (2010)
0.01
0.0068012597 = product of:
0.013602519 = sum of:
0.013602519 = product of:
0.027205039 = sum of:
0.027205039 = weight(_text_:r in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027205039 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Adding or deleting items such as self-citations has an influence on the h-index of an author. This influence will be proved mathematically in this article. We hereby prove the experimental finding in E. Gianoli and M.A. Molina-Montenegro ([2009]) that the influence of adding or deleting self-citations on the h-index is greater for low values of the h-index. Why this is logical also is shown by a simple theoretical example. Adding or deleting sources such as adding or deleting minor contributions of an author also has an influence on the h-index of this author; this influence is modeled in this article. This model explains some practical examples found in X. Hu, R. Rousseau, and J. Chen (in press).
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Applications of the generalized law of Benford to informetric data (2012)
0.01
0.0068012597 = product of:
0.013602519 = sum of:
0.013602519 = product of:
0.027205039 = sum of:
0.027205039 = weight(_text_:r in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027205039 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A measure for the cohesion of weighted networks (2003)
0.01
0.0056677163 = product of:
0.0113354325 = sum of:
0.0113354325 = product of:
0.022670865 = sum of:
0.022670865 = weight(_text_:r in 5157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022670865 = score(doc=5157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 5157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5157)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
