Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"17.56 Semantik"
  1. Semantik, Lexikographie und Computeranwendungen : Workshop ... (Bonn) : 1995.01.27-28 (1996) 0.01
    0.006342702 = product of:
      0.012685404 = sum of:
        0.012685404 = product of:
          0.025370808 = sum of:
            0.025370808 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025370808 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 4.2007 10:04:22
  2. Murphy, M.L.: Semantic relations and the lexicon : antonymy, synonymy and other paradigms (2008) 0.01
    0.006342702 = product of:
      0.012685404 = sum of:
        0.012685404 = product of:
          0.025370808 = sum of:
            0.025370808 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025370808 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2013 10:53:30
  3. Murphy, M.L.: Lexical meaning (2010) 0.01
    0.0050741616 = product of:
      0.010148323 = sum of:
        0.010148323 = product of:
          0.020296646 = sum of:
            0.020296646 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020296646 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2013 10:53:30
  4. Semantic knowledge and semantic representations (1995) 0.00
    0.004534173 = product of:
      0.009068346 = sum of:
        0.009068346 = product of:
          0.018136691 = sum of:
            0.018136691 = weight(_text_:r in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018136691 = score(doc=3568,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    G. Gainotti, M.C. Silveri, A. Daniele, L. Giustolisi, Neuroanatomical Correlates of Category-specific Semantic Disorders: A Critical Survey. J. S. Snowden, H. L. Griffiths, D. Neary, Autobiographical Experience and Word Meaning. L. Cipolotti, E.K. Warrington, Towards a Unitary Account of Access Dysphasia: A Single Case Study. E. Forde, G.W. Humphreys, Refractory Semantics in Global Aphasia: On Semantic Organisation and the Access-Storage Distinction in Neuropsychology. A. E. Hillis, A. Caramazza, The Compositionality of Lexical Semantic Representations: Clues from Semantic Errors in Object Naming. H.E. Moss, L.K. Tyler, Investigating Semantic Memory Impairments: The Contribution of Semantic Priming. K.R. Laws, S.A. Humber, D.J.C. Ramsey, R.A. McCarthy, Probing Sensory and Associative Semantics for Animals and Objects in Normal Subjects. K.R. Laws, J.J. Evans, J. R. Hodges, R.A. McCarthy, Naming without Knowing and Appearance without Associations: Evidence for Constructive Processes in Semantic Memory? J. Powell, J. Davidoff, Selective Impairments of Object-knowledge in a Case of Acquired Cortical Blindness. J.R. Hodges, N. Graham, K. Patterson, Charting the Progression in Semantic Dementia: Implications for the Organisation of Semantic Memory. E. Funnell, Objects and Properties: A Study of the Breakdown of Semantic Memory. L.J. Tippett, S. McAuliffe, M. J. Farrar, Preservation of Categorical Knowledge in Alzheimer's Disease: A Computational Account. G. W. Humphreys, C. Lamote, T.J. Lloyd-Jones, An Interactive Activation Approach to Object Processing: Effects of Structural Similarity, Name Frequency, and Task in Normality and Pathology.

Languages

Types

Classifications