Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.03
    0.032361146 = product of:
      0.06472229 = sum of:
        0.06472229 = sum of:
          0.044425644 = weight(_text_:r in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044425644 = score(doc=5171,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.037451506 = queryNorm
              0.358346 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.020296646 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020296646 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.037451506 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
  2. Hjerppe, R.: ¬An outline of bibliometrics and citation analysis (1980) 0.03
    0.025649156 = product of:
      0.051298313 = sum of:
        0.051298313 = product of:
          0.102596626 = sum of:
            0.102596626 = weight(_text_:r in 1115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102596626 = score(doc=1115,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.8275646 = fieldWeight in 1115, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1115)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    r
  3. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.020296646 = product of:
      0.040593293 = sum of:
        0.040593293 = product of:
          0.081186585 = sum of:
            0.081186585 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081186585 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  4. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.017939871 = product of:
      0.035879742 = sum of:
        0.035879742 = product of:
          0.071759485 = sum of:
            0.071759485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071759485 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  5. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.010763924 = product of:
      0.021527847 = sum of:
        0.021527847 = product of:
          0.043055695 = sum of:
            0.043055695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043055695 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  6. Milman, B.L.: Individual co-citation clusters as nuclei of complete and dynamic informetric models of scientific and technological areas (1994) 0.01
    0.007934803 = product of:
      0.015869606 = sum of:
        0.015869606 = product of:
          0.031739213 = sum of:
            0.031739213 = weight(_text_:r in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031739213 = score(doc=37,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the construction of improved informetric models of individual scientific and technological areas on the basis of individual co citation clusters. The developed methodology of replenishment of research front with accidently absent papers describes the model more completely. Proposes the simple method of cluster 'dynamization' for the study of evolution of research area. The transition under consideration from co citation clusters to lexical maps of papers and patents enables the monitoring of the relationshuip between R and D in a given technological area. Provides the example from modern chemical engineering of Pressure-Swing Adsorption
  7. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01
    0.0076112426 = product of:
      0.015222485 = sum of:
        0.015222485 = product of:
          0.03044497 = sum of:
            0.03044497 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03044497 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  8. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.01
    0.0076112426 = product of:
      0.015222485 = sum of:
        0.015222485 = product of:
          0.03044497 = sum of:
            0.03044497 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03044497 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  9. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01
    0.0076112426 = product of:
      0.015222485 = sum of:
        0.015222485 = product of:
          0.03044497 = sum of:
            0.03044497 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03044497 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  10. Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000) 0.01
    0.0068012597 = product of:
      0.013602519 = sum of:
        0.013602519 = product of:
          0.027205039 = sum of:
            0.027205039 = weight(_text_:r in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027205039 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
  11. Chen, C.; Cribbin, T.; Macredie, R.; Morar, S.: Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms : two case studies (2002) 0.01
    0.0068012597 = product of:
      0.013602519 = sum of:
        0.013602519 = product of:
          0.027205039 = sum of:
            0.027205039 = weight(_text_:r in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027205039 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.: Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods (2005) 0.01
    0.0068012597 = product of:
      0.013602519 = sum of:
        0.013602519 = product of:
          0.027205039 = sum of:
            0.027205039 = weight(_text_:r in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027205039 = score(doc=3264,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Boyack, K.W.; Small, H.; Klavans, R.: Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text (2013) 0.01
    0.0068012597 = product of:
      0.013602519 = sum of:
        0.013602519 = product of:
          0.027205039 = sum of:
            0.027205039 = weight(_text_:r in 1036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027205039 = score(doc=1036,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1036, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1036)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Hu, X.; Rousseau, R.: Do citation chimeras exist? : The case of under-cited influential articles suffering delayed recognition (2019) 0.01
    0.0068012597 = product of:
      0.013602519 = sum of:
        0.013602519 = product of:
          0.027205039 = sum of:
            0.027205039 = weight(_text_:r in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027205039 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.01
    0.006342702 = product of:
      0.012685404 = sum of:
        0.012685404 = product of:
          0.025370808 = sum of:
            0.025370808 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025370808 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
  16. Stock, W.G.: Publikation und Zitat : Die problematische Basis empirischer Wissenschaftsforschung (2001) 0.01
    0.0056677163 = product of:
      0.0113354325 = sum of:
        0.0113354325 = product of:
          0.022670865 = sum of:
            0.022670865 = weight(_text_:r in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022670865 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    r
  17. Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004) 0.01
    0.0056677163 = product of:
      0.0113354325 = sum of:
        0.0113354325 = product of:
          0.022670865 = sum of:
            0.022670865 = weight(_text_:r in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022670865 = score(doc=2266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Czepel, R.: ¬Die Geographie der wissenschaftlichen Zitierung (2003) 0.00
    0.004534173 = product of:
      0.009068346 = sum of:
        0.009068346 = product of:
          0.018136691 = sum of:
            0.018136691 = weight(_text_:r in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018136691 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Umstätter, W.: Szientometrische Verfahren (2004) 0.00
    0.004534173 = product of:
      0.009068346 = sum of:
        0.009068346 = product of:
          0.018136691 = sum of:
            0.018136691 = weight(_text_:r in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018136691 = score(doc=2920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
  20. Wouters, P.; Vries, R. de: Formally citing the Web (2004) 0.00
    0.004534173 = product of:
      0.009068346 = sum of:
        0.009068346 = product of:
          0.018136691 = sum of:
            0.018136691 = weight(_text_:r in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018136691 = score(doc=3093,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)