Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × type_ss:"m"
  1. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.01
    0.010763924 = product of:
      0.021527847 = sum of:
        0.021527847 = product of:
          0.043055695 = sum of:
            0.043055695 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043055695 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
  2. Stuart, D.: Practical ontologies for information professionals (2016) 0.01
    0.010496758 = product of:
      0.020993516 = sum of:
        0.020993516 = product of:
          0.04198703 = sum of:
            0.04198703 = weight(_text_:r in 5152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04198703 = score(doc=5152,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.33867568 = fieldWeight in 5152, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    C H A P T E R 1 What is an ontology?; Introduction; The data deluge and information overload; Defining terms; Knowledge organization systems and ontologies; Ontologies, metadata and linked data; What can an ontology do?; Ontologies and information professionals; Alternatives to ontologies; The aims of this book; The structure of this book; C H A P T E R 2 Ontologies and the semantic web; Introduction; The semantic web and linked data; Resource Description Framework (RDF); Classes, subclasses and properties; The semantic web stack; Embedded RDF; Alternative semantic visionsLibraries and the semantic web; Other cultural heritage institutions and the semantic web; Other organizations and the semantic web; Conclusion; C H A P T E R 3 Existing ontologies; Introduction; Ontology documentation; Ontologies for representing ontologies; Ontologies for libraries; Upper ontologies; Cultural heritage data models; Ontologies for the web; Conclusion; C H A P T E R 4 Adopting ontologies; Introduction; Reusing ontologies: application profiles and data models; Identifying ontologies; The ideal ontology discovery tool; Selection criteria; Conclusion C H A P T E R 5 Building ontologiesIntroduction; Approaches to building an ontology; The twelve steps; Ontology development example: Bibliometric Metrics Ontology element set; Conclusion; C H A P T E R 6 Interrogating ontologies; Introduction; Interrogating ontologies for reuse; Interrogating a knowledge base; Understanding ontology use; Conclusion; C H A P T E R 7 The future of ontologies and the information professional; Introduction; The future of ontologies for knowledge discovery; The future role of library and information professionals; The practical development of ontologies
  3. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014) 0.01
    0.0076112426 = product of:
      0.015222485 = sum of:
        0.015222485 = product of:
          0.03044497 = sum of:
            0.03044497 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03044497 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 7.2017 13:49:22
  4. Handbook on ontologies (2004) 0.01
    0.0056677163 = product of:
      0.0113354325 = sum of:
        0.0113354325 = product of:
          0.022670865 = sum of:
            0.022670865 = weight(_text_:r in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022670865 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Editor
    Staab, S. u. R. Studer
  5. Widhalm, R.; Mück, T.: Topic maps : Semantische Suche im Internet (2002) 0.00
    0.004534173 = product of:
      0.009068346 = sum of:
        0.009068346 = product of:
          0.018136691 = sum of:
            0.018136691 = weight(_text_:r in 4731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018136691 = score(doc=4731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 4731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Arp, R.; Smith, B.; Spear, A.D.: Building ontologies with basic formal ontology (2015) 0.00
    0.004534173 = product of:
      0.009068346 = sum of:
        0.009068346 = product of:
          0.018136691 = sum of:
            0.018136691 = weight(_text_:r in 3444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018136691 = score(doc=3444,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 3444, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3444)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Semantic knowledge and semantic representations (1995) 0.00
    0.004534173 = product of:
      0.009068346 = sum of:
        0.009068346 = product of:
          0.018136691 = sum of:
            0.018136691 = weight(_text_:r in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018136691 = score(doc=3568,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037451506 = queryNorm
                0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    G. Gainotti, M.C. Silveri, A. Daniele, L. Giustolisi, Neuroanatomical Correlates of Category-specific Semantic Disorders: A Critical Survey. J. S. Snowden, H. L. Griffiths, D. Neary, Autobiographical Experience and Word Meaning. L. Cipolotti, E.K. Warrington, Towards a Unitary Account of Access Dysphasia: A Single Case Study. E. Forde, G.W. Humphreys, Refractory Semantics in Global Aphasia: On Semantic Organisation and the Access-Storage Distinction in Neuropsychology. A. E. Hillis, A. Caramazza, The Compositionality of Lexical Semantic Representations: Clues from Semantic Errors in Object Naming. H.E. Moss, L.K. Tyler, Investigating Semantic Memory Impairments: The Contribution of Semantic Priming. K.R. Laws, S.A. Humber, D.J.C. Ramsey, R.A. McCarthy, Probing Sensory and Associative Semantics for Animals and Objects in Normal Subjects. K.R. Laws, J.J. Evans, J. R. Hodges, R.A. McCarthy, Naming without Knowing and Appearance without Associations: Evidence for Constructive Processes in Semantic Memory? J. Powell, J. Davidoff, Selective Impairments of Object-knowledge in a Case of Acquired Cortical Blindness. J.R. Hodges, N. Graham, K. Patterson, Charting the Progression in Semantic Dementia: Implications for the Organisation of Semantic Memory. E. Funnell, Objects and Properties: A Study of the Breakdown of Semantic Memory. L.J. Tippett, S. McAuliffe, M. J. Farrar, Preservation of Categorical Knowledge in Alzheimer's Disease: A Computational Account. G. W. Humphreys, C. Lamote, T.J. Lloyd-Jones, An Interactive Activation Approach to Object Processing: Effects of Structural Similarity, Name Frequency, and Task in Normality and Pathology.

Languages

Subjects