Rao, I.K.: ¬The distribution of scientific productivity and social change (1978)
0.01
0.009068346 = product of:
0.018136691 = sum of:
0.018136691 = product of:
0.036273383 = sum of:
0.036273383 = weight(_text_:r in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036273383 = score(doc=8,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Results in the literature concerning the probability that an author publishes r articles in time t are reexamined, and it is found that a negative binomial distribution bits scientific productivity data (by the chi-squared goodness-of-fit-test) better than many other distribution such as geometric, logarithmic, zeta, cumulative advantage, etc. It is shown analytically that the nagative binomial distribution describes a pattern of scientific productivity under the 'success-breeds-success' condition in a wide variety of social circumstances
