Search (365 results, page 1 of 19)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Informations- und Wissensverarbeitung in den Sozialwissenschaften : Beiträge zur Umsetzung neuer Informationstechnologien (1994) 0.04 
    0.04418063 = product of:
  0.08836126 = sum of:
    0.01755585 = weight(_text_:h in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01755585 = score(doc=5067,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
    0.070805416 = weight(_text_:u.a in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.070805416 = score(doc=5067,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.43138522 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die Beiträge behandeln aus verschiedenen Blickwinkeln einen durch die Begriffe Sozialwissenschaft-Informatik-Information abgegrenzten, interdisziplinären Themenkomplex. Gerade in den Sozialwissenschaften haben die qualitative Textinterpretation und die Suche nach typischen, einzelnen Fällen ihren festen Stellenwert, und automatische Informationssuche und Informationsaufbereitung sind zu unverzichtbaren Forschungsinstrumenten geworden. Dieser Band enthält eine Vielzahl von Fachbeiträgen, die im Rahmen entsprechender Spezialveranstaltungen entstanden sind oder eigens für diesen Band geschrieben wurden. Sowohl als Einführungen wie auch im Rahmen spezieller Fragestellungen werden Ansätze aus den Gebieten Künstliche Intelligenz, Bilderkennung, Kommunikationsnetze, Hypertext, Szientometrie, Bibliometrie u.a., jeweils mit Bezug auf sozialwissenschaftliche Anwendung, vorgestellt
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: INGWERSEN, P.: Information science as a cognitive science; MEDER, N.: Objekt-orientierte Wissensdarstellung und -navigation; SPIESS, M.: Repräsentation unsicheren Wissens; HENRICHS, N.: Begriffswandel in Datenbanken: kontextuelle Inhaltsanalyse für Disambiguierung und ideengeschichtliche Analyse; VOGT, C. u. R. WILLE: Formale Begriffsanalyse: Darstellung und Analyse von bibliographischen Daten; RITTBERGER, M.: Online-Retrieval und Hypertext: auf dem Weg zu verknüpften Datenbanken und offenen Hypertextsystemen; SCHOPEN, M.: GRIPS-Menu: Unterstützung von Endnutzerrecherchen in Literaturdatenbanken des DIMDI; KLOSE, G. u. T. PIRLEIN: Wissensmodellierung in LILOG; DANIEL, H.-D.: Peer-review als Qualitätsfilter im wissenschaftlichen Publikationswesen
    Editor
    Best, H. u.a.
  2. Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008) 0.03 
    0.02946021 = product of:
  0.05892042 = sum of:
    0.04905543 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04905543 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.29887244 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
    0.00986499 = product of:
      0.029594969 = sum of:
        0.029594969 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029594969 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:03:12
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Costas, R., M. Bordons u. T.N. van Leeuwen u.a.: Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753.
  3. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.02 
    0.024638887 = product of:
  0.049277775 = sum of:
    0.039412785 = weight(_text_:h in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039412785 = score(doc=590,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.435748 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
    0.00986499 = product of:
      0.029594969 = sum of:
        0.029594969 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029594969 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
    Object
    H-Index
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.1, S.124-125
  4. Schoepflin, U.; Glänzel, W.: Mehrwert von bibliographischen Datenbanken (1994) 0.02 
    0.024527716 = product of:
  0.09811086 = sum of:
    0.09811086 = weight(_text_:u.a in 6112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09811086 = score(doc=6112,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.5977449 = fieldWeight in 6112, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6112)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Mehrwert von Information - Professionalisierung der Informationsarbeit: Proceedings des 4. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'94), Graz, 2.-4. November 1994. Hrsg.: W. Rauch u.a
  5. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.02 
    0.021666262 = product of:
  0.043332525 = sum of:
    0.0351117 = weight(_text_:h in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0351117 = score(doc=4147,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
    0.008220825 = product of:
      0.024662476 = sum of:
        0.024662476 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024662476 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This review aims to show, broadly, how the h-index has become a subject of widespread debate, how it has spawned many variants and diverse applications since first introduced in 2005 and some of the issues in its use. Design/methodology/approach - The review drew on a range of material published in 1990 or so sources published since 2005. From these sources, a number of themes were identified and discussed ranging from the h-index's advantages to which citation database might be selected for its calculation. Findings - The analysis shows how the h-index has quickly established itself as a major subject of interest in the field of bibliometrics. Study of the index ranges from its mathematical underpinning to a range of variants perceived to address the indexes' shortcomings. The review illustrates how widely the index has been applied but also how care must be taken in its application. Originality/value - The use of bibliometric indicators to measure research performance continues, with the h-index as its latest addition. The use of the h-index, its variants and many applications to which it has been put are still at the exploratory stage. The review shows the breadth and diversity of this research and the need to verify the veracity of the h-index by more studies.
    Date
    8. 1.2011 19:22:13
    Object
    h-index
  6. Petersen, A.; Münch, V.: STN® AnaVist(TM) holt verborgenes Wissen aus Recherche-Ergebnissen : Neue Software analysiert und visualisiert Marktaufteilung, Forschung und Patentaktivitäten (2005) 0.02 
    0.021317355 = product of:
  0.04263471 = sum of:
    0.009931088 = weight(_text_:h in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009931088 = score(doc=3984,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
    0.032703623 = weight(_text_:u.a in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032703623 = score(doc=3984,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.1992483 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die wichtigsten Funktionen von STN AnaVist sind: - Inhalte aus mehreren Datenbanken sind gleichzeitig auswertbar - Nutzer können Daten aus unterschiedlichen Ouellen suchen, analysieren und visualisieren, u.a. aus der Chemiedatenbank CAplusSM, der Patentdatenbank PCTFULL, und US-amerikanischen Volltextdatenbanken. - Einzigartige Beziehungen zwischen Datenelementen-nur STN AnaVist bietet die Möglichkeit, Beziehungen zwischen sieben unterschiedlichen Feldern aus Datenbankdokumenten - z.B., Firmen, Erfindern, Veröffentlichungsjahren und Konzepten-darzustellen. - Gruppierung und Bereinigung von Daten - vor der Analyse werden Firmen und ihre unterschiedlichen Namensvarianten von einem "Company Name Thesaurus" zusammengefasst. - Konzept-Standardisierung - Durch das CAS-Vokabular werden Fachbegriffe datenbankübergreifend standardisiert, so dass weniger Streuung auftritt. - Interaktive Präsentation der Beziehungen zwischen Daten und Diagrammenwährend der Auswertung können Daten zum besseren Erkennen der Beziehungen farblich hervorgehoben werden. - Flexible Erstellung der auszuwertenden Rechercheergebnisse - Rechercheergebnisse, die als Ausgangsdatensatz für die Analyse verwendet werden sollen, können auf zwei Arten gewonnen werden: zum einen über die in STN® AnaVist(TM) integrierte Konzept-Suchfunktion, zum anderen durch problemlose Übernahme von Suchergebnissen aus der bewährten Software STN Express® with Discover! TM Analysis Edition, Version 8.0
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.5/6, S.319-322
  7. Garfield, E.: Essays of an information scientist (1977-) 0.02 
    0.020439764 = product of:
  0.08175906 = sum of:
    0.08175906 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08175906 = score(doc=2015,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.49812075 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    U.a. Wiedergabe der Beiträge von E. Garfield in der Rubrik 'Current comments' in den 'Current contents'
  8. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.02 
    0.019314226 = product of:
  0.03862845 = sum of:
    0.030407624 = weight(_text_:h in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030407624 = score(doc=2352,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.3361869 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
    0.008220825 = product of:
      0.024662476 = sum of:
        0.024662476 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024662476 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
    Object
    h-index
  9. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.02 
    0.016507749 = product of:
  0.033015497 = sum of:
    0.019862177 = weight(_text_:h in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019862177 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
    0.013153321 = product of:
      0.039459962 = sum of:
        0.039459962 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039459962 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.401-406
  10. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.02 
    0.016507749 = product of:
  0.033015497 = sum of:
    0.019862177 = weight(_text_:h in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019862177 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
    0.013153321 = product of:
      0.039459962 = sum of:
        0.039459962 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039459962 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
  11. Schramm, R.: Kerninformationen mittels formaler Bewertungskritierien (1996) 0.02 
    0.016351812 = product of:
  0.06540725 = sum of:
    0.06540725 = weight(_text_:u.a in 6258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06540725 = score(doc=6258,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.3984966 = fieldWeight in 6258, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6258)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Herausforderungen an die Informationswirtschaft: Informationsverdichtung, Informationsbewertung und Datenvisualisierung. Proceedings des 5. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'96), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 17.-19. Oktober 1996. Hrsg.: J. Krause u.a
  12. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.02 
    0.015466005 = product of:
  0.03093201 = sum of:
    0.02106702 = weight(_text_:h in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02106702 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
    0.00986499 = product of:
      0.029594969 = sum of:
        0.029594969 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029594969 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182
  13. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.01 
    0.01444428 = product of:
  0.02888856 = sum of:
    0.017379405 = weight(_text_:h in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017379405 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
    0.011509156 = product of:
      0.034527466 = sum of:
        0.034527466 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034527466 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.1, S.1-8
  14. Glänzel, W.: Visual bibliometrics : eine visuelle Oberfläche zur Erweiterung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten bibliographischer Datenbanken (1996) 0.01 
    0.014307834 = product of:
  0.057231337 = sum of:
    0.057231337 = weight(_text_:u.a in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057231337 = score(doc=6110,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.34868452 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Herausforderungen an die Informationswirtschaft: Informationsverdichtung, Informationsbewertung und Datenvisualisierung. Proceedings des 5. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'96), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 17.-19. Oktober 1996. Hrsg.: J. Krause u.a
  15. Calculating the h-index : Web of Science, Scopus or Google Scholar? (2011) 0.01 
    0.012413861 = product of:
  0.049655445 = sum of:
    0.049655445 = weight(_text_:h in 854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049655445 = score(doc=854,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.5489909 = fieldWeight in 854, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=854)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Gegenüberstellung der Berechnung des h-Index in den drei Tools mit Beispiel Stephen Hawking (WoS: 59, Scopus: 19, Google Scholar: 76)
    Object
    h-index
    Source
    https://dspace.ndlr.ie/jspui/bitstream/10633/27353/9/H%20index%20datasheet.pdf
  16. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01 
    0.01238081 = product of:
  0.02476162 = sum of:
    0.014896632 = weight(_text_:h in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014896632 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
    0.00986499 = product of:
      0.029594969 = sum of:
        0.029594969 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029594969 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  17. Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012) 0.01 
    0.01238081 = product of:
  0.02476162 = sum of:
    0.014896632 = weight(_text_:h in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014896632 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
    0.00986499 = product of:
      0.029594969 = sum of:
        0.029594969 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029594969 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:23:32
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.2, S.71-80
  18. Wan, X.; Liu, F.: Are all literature citations equally important? : automatic citation strength estimation and its applications (2014) 0.01 
    0.01238081 = product of:
  0.02476162 = sum of:
    0.014896632 = weight(_text_:h in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014896632 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
    0.00986499 = product of:
      0.029594969 = sum of:
        0.029594969 = weight(_text_:22 in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029594969 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Literature citation analysis plays a very important role in bibliometrics and scientometrics, such as the Science Citation Index (SCI) impact factor, h-index. Existing citation analysis methods assume that all citations in a paper are equally important, and they simply count the number of citations. Here we argue that the citations in a paper are not equally important and some citations are more important than the others. We use a strength value to assess the importance of each citation and propose to use the regression method with a few useful features for automatically estimating the strength value of each citation. Evaluation results on a manually labeled data set in the computer science field show that the estimated values can achieve good correlation with human-labeled values. We further apply the estimated citation strength values for evaluating paper influence and author influence, and the preliminary evaluation results demonstrate the usefulness of the citation strength values.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:35
  19. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.01 
    0.01238081 = product of:
  0.02476162 = sum of:
    0.014896632 = weight(_text_:h in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014896632 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
    0.00986499 = product of:
      0.029594969 = sum of:
        0.029594969 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029594969 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  20. Ntuli, H.; Inglesi-Lotz, R.; Chang, T.; Pouris, A.: Does research output cause economic growth or vice versa? : evidence from 34 OECD countries (2015) 0.01 
    0.01238081 = product of:
  0.02476162 = sum of:
    0.014896632 = weight(_text_:h in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014896632 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
    0.00986499 = product of:
      0.029594969 = sum of:
        0.029594969 = weight(_text_:22 in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029594969 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    8. 7.2015 22:00:42

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 272
  • d 88
  • chi 1
  • m 1
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 349
  • el 9
  • m 8
  • s 6
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications