Search (51 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.04 
    0.039280284 = product of:
  0.07856057 = sum of:
    0.06540725 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06540725 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.3984966 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
    0.013153321 = product of:
      0.039459962 = sum of:
        0.039459962 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039459962 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Pages
    S.15-22
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  2. Sack, H.; Waitelonis, J.: Zeitbezogene kollaborative Annotation zur Verbesserung der inhaltsbasierten Videosuche (2008) 0.04 
    0.03730537 = product of:
  0.07461074 = sum of:
    0.017379405 = weight(_text_:h in 2890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017379405 = score(doc=2890,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 2890, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2890)
    0.057231337 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057231337 = score(doc=2890,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.34868452 = fieldWeight in 2890, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2890)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  3. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.03 
    0.034370247 = product of:
  0.068740495 = sum of:
    0.057231337 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057231337 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.34868452 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
    0.011509156 = product of:
      0.034527466 = sum of:
        0.034527466 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034527466 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  4. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.03 
    0.02946021 = product of:
  0.05892042 = sum of:
    0.04905543 = weight(_text_:u.a in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04905543 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.29887244 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
    0.00986499 = product of:
      0.029594969 = sum of:
        0.029594969 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029594969 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  5. Vander Wal, T.: Welcome to the Matrix! (2008) 0.02 
    0.019640142 = product of:
  0.039280284 = sum of:
    0.032703623 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032703623 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.1992483 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
    0.0065766606 = product of:
      0.019729981 = sum of:
        0.019729981 = weight(_text_:22 in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019729981 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12748721 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036405887 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 6.2009 9:15:45
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  6. Hänger, C.: Good tags or bad tags? : Tagging im Kontext der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung (2008) 0.02 
    0.016351812 = product of:
  0.06540725 = sum of:
    0.06540725 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06540725 = score(doc=2886,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.3984966 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  7. Voß, J.: Vom Social Tagging zum Semantic Tagging (2008) 0.01 
    0.014307834 = product of:
  0.057231337 = sum of:
    0.057231337 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057231337 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.34868452 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  8. Held, C.; Cress, U.: Social Tagging aus kognitionspsychologischer Sicht (2008) 0.01 
    0.014307834 = product of:
  0.057231337 = sum of:
    0.057231337 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057231337 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.34868452 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  9. Schiefner, M.: Social Tagging in der universitären Lehre (2008) 0.01 
    0.014307834 = product of:
  0.057231337 = sum of:
    0.057231337 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057231337 = score(doc=2887,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.34868452 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  10. Blank, M.; Bopp, T.; Hampel, T.; Schulte, J.: Social Tagging = Soziale Suche? (2008) 0.01 
    0.014307834 = product of:
  0.057231337 = sum of:
    0.057231337 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057231337 = score(doc=2888,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.34868452 = fieldWeight in 2888, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2888)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  11. Tschetschonig, K.; Ladengruber, R.; Hampel, T.; Schulte, J.: Kollaborative Tagging-Systeme im Electronic Commerce (2008) 0.01 
    0.014307834 = product of:
  0.057231337 = sum of:
    0.057231337 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057231337 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.34868452 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  12. Good tags - bad tags : Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.01 
    0.013323348 = product of:
  0.026646696 = sum of:
    0.0062069306 = weight(_text_:h in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062069306 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09044857 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
    0.020439764 = weight(_text_:u.a in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020439764 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.12453019 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Editor
    Gaiser, B. u.a.
    Footnote
    Enthält die Beiträge der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen. Volltext unter: http://www.waxmann.com/kat/inhalt/2039Volltext.pdf. Vgl. die Rez. unter: http://sehepunkte.de/2008/11/14934.html. Rez. in: IWP 60(1009) H.4, S.246-247 (C. Wolff): "Tagging-Systeme erfreuen sich in den letzten Jahren einer ungemein großen Beliebtheit, erlauben sie dem Nutzer doch die Informationserschließung "mit eigenen Worten", also ohne Rekurs auf vorgegebene Ordnungs- und Begriffsysteme und für Medien wie Bild und Video, für die herkömmliche Verfahren des Information Retrieval (noch) versagen. Die Beherrschung der Film- und Bilderfülle, wie wir sie bei Flickr oder YouTube vorfinden, ist mit anderen Mitteln als dem intellektuellen Einsatz der Nutzer nicht vorstellbar - eine professionelle Aufbereitung angesichts der Massendaten (und ihrer zu einem großen Teil auch minderen Qualität) nicht möglich und sinnvoll. Insofern hat sich Tagging als ein probates Mittel der Erschließung herausgebildet, das dort Lücken füllen kann, wo andere Verfahren (Erschließung durch information professionals, automatische Indexierung, Erschließung durch Autoren) fehlen oder nicht anwendbar sind. Unter dem Titel "Good Tags - Bad Tags. Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" und der Herausgeberschaft von Birgit Gaiser, Thorsten Hampel und Stefanie Panke sind in der Reihe Medien in der Wissenschaft (Bd. 47) Beiträge eines interdisziplinären Workshops der Gesellschaft für Medien in der Wissenschaft zum Thema Tagging versammelt, der im Frühjahr 2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien in Tübingen stattgefunden hat. . . .
  13. Derntl, M.; Hampel, T.; Motschnig, R.; Pitner, T.: Social Tagging und Inclusive Universal Access (2008) 0.01 
    0.012263858 = product of:
  0.04905543 = sum of:
    0.04905543 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04905543 = score(doc=2864,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.29887244 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  14. Panke, S.; Gaiser, B.: "With my head up in the clouds" : Social Tagging aus Nutzersicht (2008) 0.01 
    0.012263858 = product of:
  0.04905543 = sum of:
    0.04905543 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04905543 = score(doc=2883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.29887244 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  15. Kuchler, T.; Pawlowski, J.M.; Zimmermann, V.: Social Tagging and Open Content : a concept for the future of e-learning and knowledge management? (2008) 0.01 
    0.012263858 = product of:
  0.04905543 = sum of:
    0.04905543 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04905543 = score(doc=2892,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.29887244 = fieldWeight in 2892, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2892)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  16. Schillerwein, S.: ¬Der 'Business Case' für die Nutzung von Social Tagging in Intranets und internen Informationssystemen (2008) 0.01 
    0.012263858 = product of:
  0.04905543 = sum of:
    0.04905543 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04905543 = score(doc=2893,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.29887244 = fieldWeight in 2893, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2893)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  17. Birkenhake, B.: Semantic Weblog : Erfahrungen vom Bloggen mit Tags und Ontologien (2008) 0.01 
    0.012263858 = product of:
  0.04905543 = sum of:
    0.04905543 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04905543 = score(doc=2894,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.29887244 = fieldWeight in 2894, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2894)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  18. Braun, S.; Schmidt, A.; Walter, A.; Zacharias, V.: Von Tags zu semantischen Beziehungen : kollaborative Ontologiereifung (2008) 0.01 
    0.012263858 = product of:
  0.04905543 = sum of:
    0.04905543 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04905543 = score(doc=2896,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.29887244 = fieldWeight in 2896, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2896)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  19. Güntner, G.; Sint, R.; Westenthaler, R.: ¬Ein Ansatz zur Unterstützung traditioneller Klassifikation durch Social Tagging (2008) 0.01 
    0.012263858 = product of:
  0.04905543 = sum of:
    0.04905543 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04905543 = score(doc=2897,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.29887244 = fieldWeight in 2897, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2897)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  20. Pammer, V.; Ley, T.; Lindstaedt, S.: tagr: Unterstützung in kollaborativen Tagging-Umgebungen durch semantische und assoziative Netzwerke (2008) 0.01 
    0.012263858 = product of:
  0.04905543 = sum of:
    0.04905543 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04905543 = score(doc=2898,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16413501 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036405887 = queryNorm
        0.29887244 = fieldWeight in 2898, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2898)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 30
  • e 21

Types

  • a 47
  • m 3
  • b 2
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications