Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Yitzhaki, M."
  1. Yitzhaki, M.: ¬A draft version of a consolidated thesaurus for the rapidly growing field of alternative medicine (2000) 0.00
    0.0028703054 = product of:
      0.005740611 = sum of:
        0.005740611 = product of:
          0.011481222 = sum of:
            0.011481222 = weight(_text_:a in 5417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011481222 = score(doc=5417,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5417, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Shoham, S.; Yitzhaki, M.: ¬The impact of cultural and technological changes of titles content and their use in information retrieval (1996) 0.00
    0.0020506454 = product of:
      0.004101291 = sum of:
        0.004101291 = product of:
          0.008202582 = sum of:
            0.008202582 = weight(_text_:a in 5155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008202582 = score(doc=5155,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5155, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5155)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The use of the title as a source of information about books in library catalogs and as a device for retrieval has undergone many changes over time. The paper touches on its historical development, described the impact of technological changes, and analyzed the impact of the computers on the informativity of titles. Also, the differences between Western and Eastern cultures regarding use of title is described
    Type
    a
  3. Shoham, S.; Yitzhaki, M.: Classification systems and the online catalog (1994) 0.00
    0.001674345 = product of:
      0.00334869 = sum of:
        0.00334869 = product of:
          0.00669738 = sum of:
            0.00669738 = weight(_text_:a in 7731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00669738 = score(doc=7731,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 7731, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Arguments in favor of using classification numbers for subject access are discussed. A survey of online catalog users of the Israeli academic libraries (the ALEPH system), together with monitoring of user transactions of this system revealed almost no use of classification numbers as an access point; the basic reason being that users do not understand the meanings of the codes. Also, it is maintained that monographs, in which much activity is invested, are not our main source of information, and stet the use of the online catalog for subject search in any case declines over time. Therefore, it is suggested that resources be channeled in other directions
    Type
    a
  4. Yitzhaki, M.; Hammershlag, G.: Accessibility and use of information sources among computer scientists and software engineers in Israel : academy versus industry (2004) 0.00
    0.0014647468 = product of:
      0.0029294936 = sum of:
        0.0029294936 = product of:
          0.005858987 = sum of:
            0.005858987 = weight(_text_:a in 2388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005858987 = score(doc=2388,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 2388, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2388)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Hypothesizing that workplace significantly affects information-seeking patterns, this study compared accessibility and use of information sources among 233 Israeli computer scientists and software engineers, employed in industry and academy, using a mail questionnaire, which yielded a usable reply rate of 33%. The two groups were found to differ significantly in age, education, seniority, and type of research they performed (basic vs. applied). Printed textbooks, professional journals, and oral discussions with colleagues or experts in the organization were common to both groups, topping almost all lists of accessibility and use. For most information sources, however, the two groups differed significantly and consistently. Printed professional journals as weIl as printed and electronic conference or meeting papers were consistently more accessible and more often used by the academy group, while the industry group reported greater access to and more frequent use of electronic textbooks and trade or promotional literature. In regard to handbooks and standards, in-house technical reports (printed), government technical reports (Internet), librarians and technical specialists (Internet), and oral discussions with supervisors, no significant differences in accessibility were found, but their use by the industry group was much higher. In both groups, accessibility was only partly related to use, and more so among the academy than the industry group.
    Type
    a