-
Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974)
0.03
0.031078164 = product of:
0.062156327 = sum of:
0.062156327 = sum of:
0.006079746 = weight(_text_:a in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006079746 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.056076583 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056076583 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14493774 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
-
Dahlberg, I.: Principles for the construction of a universal classification system : a proposal (1978)
0.00
0.0036856506 = product of:
0.0073713013 = sum of:
0.0073713013 = product of:
0.014742603 = sum of:
0.014742603 = weight(_text_:a in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014742603 = score(doc=67,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬A faceted classification of general concepts (2011)
0.00
0.0024032309 = product of:
0.0048064617 = sum of:
0.0048064617 = product of:
0.0096129235 = sum of:
0.0096129235 = weight(_text_:a in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0096129235 = score(doc=4824,freq=20.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- General concepts are all those form-categorial concepts which - attached to a specific concept of a classification system or thesaurus - can help to widen, sometimes even in a syntactical sense, the understanding of a case. In some existing universal classification systems such concepts have been named "auxiliaries" or "common isolates" as in the Colon Classification (CC). However, by such auxiliaries, different kinds of such concepts are listed, e.g. concepts of space and time, concepts of races and languages and concepts of kinds of documents, next to them also concepts of kinds of general activities, properties, persons, and institutions. Such latter kinds form part of the nine aspects ruling the facets in the Information Coding Classification (ICC) through the principle of using a Systematiser for the subdivision of subject groups and fields. Based on this principle and using and extending existing systems of such concepts, e.g. which A. Diemer had presented to the German Thesaurus Committee as well as those found in the UDC, in CC and attached to the Subject Heading System of the German National Library, a faceted classification is proposed for critical assessment, necessary improvement and possible later use in classification systems and thesauri.
- Source
- Classification and ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar, 19-20 September 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands. Eds.: A. Slavic u. E. Civallero
- Type
- a
-
Dahlberg, I.: Why a new universal classification system is needed (2017)
0.00
0.0023790773 = product of:
0.0047581545 = sum of:
0.0047581545 = product of:
0.009516309 = sum of:
0.009516309 = weight(_text_:a in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009516309 = score(doc=3614,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research history of the last 70 years highlights various systems for contents assessment and retrieval of scientific literature, such as universal classifications, thesauri, ontologies etc., which have followed developments of their own, notwithstanding a general trend towards interoperability, i.e. either to become instruments for cooperation or to widen their scope to encompass neighbouring fields within their framework. In the case of thesauri and ontologies, the endeavour to upgrade them into a universal system was bound to miscarry. This paper purports to indicate ways to gain from past experience and possibly rally material achievements while updating and promoting the ontologically-based faceted Information Coding Classification as a progressive universal system fit for meeting whatever requirements in the fields of information and science at large.
- Type
- a
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬The future of classification in libraries and networks : a theoretical point of view (1995)
0.00
0.002149515 = product of:
0.00429903 = sum of:
0.00429903 = product of:
0.00859806 = sum of:
0.00859806 = weight(_text_:a in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00859806 = score(doc=5563,freq=16.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Some time ago, some people said classification is dead, we don't need it any more. They probably thought that subject headings could do the job of the necessary subject analysis and shelving of books. However, all of a sudden in 1984 the attitude changed, when an OCLC study of Karen Markey started to show what could be done even with an "outdated system" such as the Dewey Decimal Classification in the computer, once it was visible on a screen to show the helpfulness of a classified library catalogue called an OPAC; classification was brought back into the minds of doubtful librarians and of all those who thought they would not need it any longer. But the problem once phrased: "We are stuck with the two old systems, LCC and DDC" would not find a solution and is still with us today. We know that our systems are outdated but we seem still to be unable to replace them with better ones. What then should one do and advise, knowing that we need something better? Perhaps a new universal ordering system which more adequately represents and mediates the world of our present day knowledge? If we were to develop it from scratch, how would we create it and implement it in such a way that it would be acceptable to the majority of the present intellectual world population?
- Type
- a
-
Dahlberg, I.: Towards a future for knowledge organization (2006)
0.00
0.0021060861 = product of:
0.0042121722 = sum of:
0.0042121722 = product of:
0.0084243445 = sum of:
0.0084243445 = weight(_text_:a in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0084243445 = score(doc=1476,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Eds.: K.S. Raghavan u. K.N. Prasad
- Type
- a
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬The Information Coding Classification (ICC) : a modern, theory-based fully-faceted, universal system of knowledge fields (2008)
0.00
0.0020106873 = product of:
0.0040213745 = sum of:
0.0040213745 = product of:
0.008042749 = sum of:
0.008042749 = weight(_text_:a in 1854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008042749 = score(doc=1854,freq=14.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 1854, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1854)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Introduction into the structure, contents and specifications (especially the Systematifier) of the Information Coding Classification, developed in the seventies and used in many ways by the author and a few others following its publication in 1982. Its theoretical basis is explained consisting in (1) the Integrative Level Theory, following an evolutionary approach of ontical areas, and integrating also on each level the aspects contained in the sequence of the levels, (2) the distinction between categories of form and categories of being, (3) the application of a feature of Systems Theory (namely the element position plan) and (4) the inclusion of a concept theory, distinguishing four kinds of relationships, originated by the kinds of characteristics (which are the elements of concepts to be derived from the statements on the properties of referents of concepts). Its special Subject Groups on each of its nine levels are outlined and the combinatory facilities at certain positions of the Systematifier are shown. Further elaboration and use have been suggested, be it only as a switching language between the six existing universal classification systems at present in use internationally.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains".
- Type
- a
-
Dahlberg, I.: Information Coding Classification : Geschichtliches, Prinzipien, Inhaltliches (2010)
0.00
0.0012159493 = product of:
0.0024318986 = sum of:
0.0024318986 = product of:
0.004863797 = sum of:
0.004863797 = weight(_text_:a in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004863797 = score(doc=4057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Dahlberg, I.: Ontische Strukturen und Wissensmuster in der Wissensorganisation (2004)
0.00
9.11962E-4 = product of:
0.001823924 = sum of:
0.001823924 = product of:
0.003647848 = sum of:
0.003647848 = weight(_text_:a in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003647848 = score(doc=3155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Dahlberg, I.: Wissensmuster und Musterwissen im Erfassen klassifikatorischer Ganzheiten (1980)
0.00
7.5996824E-4 = product of:
0.0015199365 = sum of:
0.0015199365 = product of:
0.003039873 = sum of:
0.003039873 = weight(_text_:a in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003039873 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
