Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Garcia Marco, F.J."
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Garcia Marco, F.J.; Esteban Navarro, M.A.: On some contributions of the cognitive sciences and epistemology to a theory of classification (1993) 0.00
    0.002735886 = product of:
      0.005471772 = sum of:
        0.005471772 = product of:
          0.010943544 = sum of:
            0.010943544 = weight(_text_:a in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010943544 = score(doc=5876,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Intended is first of all a preliminary review of the implications that the new approaches to the theory of classification, mainly from cognitive psychology and epistemology may have for information work and research. As a secondary topic the scientific relations existing among information science, epistemology and the cognitive sciences are discussed. Classification is seen as a central activity in all daily and scientific activities, and, of course, of knowledge organization in information services. There is a mutual implication between classification and conceptualization, as the former moves in a natural way to the latter and the best result elaborated for classification is the concept. Research in concept theory is a need for a theory of classification. In this direction it is of outstanding importance to integrate the achievements of 'natural concept formation theory' (NCFT) as an alternative approach to conceptualization different from the traditional one of logicians and problem solving researchers. In conclusion both approaches are seen as being complementary: the NCFT approach being closer to the user and the logical one being more suitable for experts, including 'expert systems'
    Type
    a
  2. Garcia Marco, F.J.; Esteban Navarro, M.A.: On some contributions of the cognitive sciences and epistemology to a theory of classification (1995) 0.00
    0.0024318986 = product of:
      0.004863797 = sum of:
        0.004863797 = product of:
          0.009727594 = sum of:
            0.009727594 = weight(_text_:a in 5559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009727594 = score(doc=5559,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5559, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5559)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses classification as a central resource of human informational activity and as a central aspect of research for many sciences. Argues that thinking about the background of classification can help improve, or at least clarify, the practical tasks of documentary workers and librarians. Discusses the relationship and gaps between cognitive science and information science, and considers the contributions of epistemology and cognitive psychology; in particular, focuses on the role of the latter in the development of an integrative theory of classification
    Type
    a
  3. Garcia Marco, F.J.: Contexto y determinantes funcionales de la clasificacion documental (1996) 0.00
    0.0023790773 = product of:
      0.0047581545 = sum of:
        0.0047581545 = product of:
          0.009516309 = sum of:
            0.009516309 = weight(_text_:a in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009516309 = score(doc=380,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers classification in the context of the information retrieval chain, a communication process. Defines classification as an heuristic methodology, which is being improved through scientific methodology. It is also an indexing process, setting each document in a systematic order, in a predictable place and therefore able to be efficiently retrieved. Classification appears to be determined by 4 factors: the structure of the world of documents, a function of the world of knowledge; the classification tools that allow us to codify them; the way in which people create and use classifications; and the features of the information unit
    Type
    a

Languages