Harvey, L.; Rousseau, R.: Development of text-editing skill : from semantic and syntactic mappings to procedures (1995)
0.00
0.0024318986 = product of:
0.004863797 = sum of:
0.004863797 = product of:
0.009727594 = sum of:
0.009727594 = weight(_text_:a in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009727594 = score(doc=3845,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers whether joint syntax (a single step linking object and procedure) or disjoint, 2 step, processes are best suited to particular tasks of text editing. Finds that specific procedures are not necessarily faster to use than general ones. users of joint editors consulted the help menu less often and for longer and experienced a greater workload than users of disjoint editors. The experiment shows that general text editing procedures obeying a disjoint systax minimize workload. Specific objects and joint syntax are advanced features that should be reserved for experienced users
- Type
- a
