Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Townley, C."
  1. Townley, C.: College libraries and resource sharing : testing a compact disc union catalog (1992) 0.00 
    0.0024318986 = product of:
  0.004863797 = sum of:
    0.004863797 = product of:
      0.009727594 = sum of:
        0.009727594 = weight(_text_:a in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009727594 = score(doc=3109,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041389145 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In 1990, the 17 collegiate members of the Associated College Libraries of Central Pennsylvania tested a CD-ROM union catalogue to determine its effects on resource sharing in a college library consortium. Reports the outcomes of the test in the area of bibliographic quality, user evaluation, public relations strategies, and operating guidelines. Desired enhancements and additional research needs are identified
    Type
    a
  2. Geng, Q.; Townley, C.; Huang, K.; Zhang, J.: Comparative knowledge management : a pilot study of Chinese and American universities (2005) 0.00 
    0.0018428253 = product of:
  0.0036856506 = sum of:
    0.0036856506 = product of:
      0.0073713013 = sum of:
        0.0073713013 = weight(_text_:a in 3876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0073713013 = score(doc=3876,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041389145 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 3876, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3876)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Comparative study of knowledge management (KM) promises to lead to more effective knowledge use in all cultural environments. This pilot study compares KM priorities, needs, tools, and administrative structure components in large Chinese and American universities. General KM theory and literature related to KM in higher education are analyzed to develop the four components of the study. Comparative differences in KM practice at large Chinese and American universities are analyzed for each component. A correlation matrix reveals statistically significant co-variation among all but one of the study components. Four conclusions related to comparative KM and suggestions for future research are presented.
    Type
    a

Authors

Years