Search (77 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  1. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.03
    0.027868524 = product of:
      0.05573705 = sum of:
        0.05573705 = sum of:
          0.010875782 = weight(_text_:a in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010875782 = score(doc=1901,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041389145 = queryNorm
              0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.044861265 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044861265 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14493774 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041389145 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    TOSCANA is a computer program which allows an online interaction with larger data bases to analyse and explore data conceptually. It uses labelled line diagrams of concept lattices to communicate knowledge coded in given data. The basic problem to create online presentations of concept lattices is solved by composing prepared diagrams to nested line diagrams. A larger number of applications in different areas have already shown that TOSCANA is a useful tool for many purposes
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81
    Type
    a
  2. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.02
    0.023882624 = product of:
      0.047765248 = sum of:
        0.047765248 = sum of:
          0.008511645 = weight(_text_:a in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008511645 = score(doc=5095,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041389145 = queryNorm
              0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
          0.039253604 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039253604 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14493774 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041389145 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an abstract formalization of the notion of "facets". Facets are relational structures of units, relations and other facets selected for a certain purpose. Facets can be used to structure large knowledge representation systems into a hierarchical arrangement of consistent and independent subsystems (facets) that facilitate flexibility and combinations of different viewpoints or aspects. This paper describes the basic notions, facet characteristics and construction mechanisms. It then explicates the theory in an example of a faceted information retrieval system (FaIR)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06
    Type
    a
  3. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.02
    0.023882624 = product of:
      0.047765248 = sum of:
        0.047765248 = sum of:
          0.008511645 = weight(_text_:a in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008511645 = score(doc=2654,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041389145 = queryNorm
              0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.039253604 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039253604 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14493774 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041389145 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
    Type
    a
  4. Prediger, S.: Kontextuelle Urteilslogik mit Begriffsgraphen : Ein Beitrag zur Restrukturierung der mathematischen Logik (1998) 0.01
    0.014019146 = product of:
      0.028038291 = sum of:
        0.028038291 = product of:
          0.056076583 = sum of:
            0.056076583 = weight(_text_:22 in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056076583 = score(doc=3142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14493774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 2.2008 15:58:22
  5. Wille, R.: Lattices in data analysis : how to draw them with a computer (1989) 0.00
    0.003439224 = product of:
      0.006878448 = sum of:
        0.006878448 = product of:
          0.013756896 = sum of:
            0.013756896 = weight(_text_:a in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013756896 = score(doc=3043,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Ganter, B.; Stahl, J.; Wille, R.: Conceptual measurement and many-valued contexts (1986) 0.00
    0.0030093212 = product of:
      0.0060186423 = sum of:
        0.0060186423 = product of:
          0.012037285 = sum of:
            0.012037285 = weight(_text_:a in 3137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012037285 = score(doc=3137,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3137, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3137)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Classification as a tool of research. Ed.: W. Gaul u. M. Schader
    Type
    a
  7. Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Data analysis based on a conceptual file (1991) 0.00
    0.0030093212 = product of:
      0.0060186423 = sum of:
        0.0060186423 = product of:
          0.012037285 = sum of:
            0.012037285 = weight(_text_:a in 3140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012037285 = score(doc=3140,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3140, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3140)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.00
    0.0030093212 = product of:
      0.0060186423 = sum of:
        0.0060186423 = product of:
          0.012037285 = sum of:
            0.012037285 = weight(_text_:a in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012037285 = score(doc=595,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  9. Lex, W.: ¬A representation of concepts for their computerization (1987) 0.00
    0.0029784553 = product of:
      0.0059569106 = sum of:
        0.0059569106 = product of:
          0.011913821 = sum of:
            0.011913821 = weight(_text_:a in 618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011913821 = score(doc=618,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 618, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=618)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A lattice theoretical description of concept hierarchies is developed using for attributes the terms "given", "negated", "open" and "impossible" as the truth-values of a four-valued logic. Similar to the theory of B. Ganter and R. Wille so does this framework permit a precise representation of the usual interdependences in a field of related concepts - such as superconcepts, subconcept, contrary concepts etc. -, whenever the concepts under consideration can be sufficiently described by the presence or absence of certain attributes ...
    Type
    a
  10. Luksch, P.; Wille, R.: ¬A mathematical model for conceptual knowledge systems (1991) 0.00
    0.002814962 = product of:
      0.005629924 = sum of:
        0.005629924 = product of:
          0.011259848 = sum of:
            0.011259848 = weight(_text_:a in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011259848 = score(doc=3033,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Objects, attributes, and concepts are basic notations of conceptual knowledge; they are linked by the following four basic relations: an object has an attribute, an object belongs to a concept, an attribute abstracts from a concept, and a concept is a subconcept of another concept. These structural elements are well mathematized in formal concept analysis. Therefore, conceptual knowledge systems can be mathematically modelled in the frame of formal concept analysis. How such modelling may be performed is indicated by an example of a conceptual knowledge system. The formal definition of the model finally clarifies in which ways representation, inference, acquisition, and communication of conceptual knowledge can be mathematically treated
    Type
    a
  11. Kaytoue, M.; Kuznetsov, S.O.; Assaghir, Z.; Napoli, A.: Embedding tolerance relations in concept lattices : an application in information fusion (2010) 0.00
    0.002740105 = product of:
      0.00548021 = sum of:
        0.00548021 = product of:
          0.01096042 = sum of:
            0.01096042 = weight(_text_:a in 4843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01096042 = score(doc=4843,freq=26.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.22966442 = fieldWeight in 4843, product of:
                  5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                    26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4843)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) is a well founded mathematical framework used for conceptual classication and knowledge management. Given a binary table describing a relation between objects and attributes, FCA consists in building a set of concepts organized by a subsumption relation within a concept lattice. Accordingly, FCA requires to transform complex data, e.g. numbers, intervals, graphs, into binary data leading to loss of information and poor interpretability of object classes. In this paper, we propose a pre-processing method producing binary data from complex data taking advantage of similarity between objects. As a result, the concept lattice is composed of classes being maximal sets of pairwise similar objects. This method is based on FCA and on a formalization of similarity as a tolerance relation (reexive and symmetric). It applies to complex object descriptions and especially here to interval data. Moreover, it can be applied to any kind of structured data for which a similarity can be dened (sequences, graphs, etc.). Finally, an application highlights that the resulting concept lattice plays an important role in information fusion problem, as illustrated with a real-world example in agronomy.
  12. Priss, U.: Lattice-based information retrieval (2000) 0.00
    0.0026061484 = product of:
      0.0052122967 = sum of:
        0.0052122967 = product of:
          0.010424593 = sum of:
            0.010424593 = weight(_text_:a in 6055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010424593 = score(doc=6055,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 6055, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A lattice-based model for information retrieval was suggested in the 1960's but has been seen as a theoretical possibility hard to practically apply ever since. This paper attempts to revive the lattice model and demonstrate its applicability in an information retrieval system, FalR, that incorporates a graphical representation of a faceted thesaurus. It shows how Boolean queries can be lattice-theoretically related to the concepts of the thesaurus and visualized within the thesaurus display. An advantage of FaIR is that it allows for a high level of transparency of the system, which can be controlled by the user
    Type
    a
  13. Priss, U.: ¬A graphical interface for conceptually navigating faceted thesauri (1998) 0.00
    0.0026061484 = product of:
      0.0052122967 = sum of:
        0.0052122967 = product of:
          0.010424593 = sum of:
            0.010424593 = weight(_text_:a in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010424593 = score(doc=6658,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a graphical interface for the navigation and construction of faceted thesauri that is based on formal concept analysis. Each facet of a thesaurus is represented as a mathematical lattice that is further subdivided into components. Users can graphically navigate through the Java implementation of the interface by clicking on terms that connect facets and components. Since there are many applications for thesauri in the knowledge representation field, such a graphical interface has the potential of being very useful
    Type
    a
  14. Wille, R.: Begriffliche Datensysteme als Werkzeuge der Wissenskommunikation (1992) 0.00
    0.002579418 = product of:
      0.005158836 = sum of:
        0.005158836 = product of:
          0.010317672 = sum of:
            0.010317672 = weight(_text_:a in 8826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010317672 = score(doc=8826,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 8826, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz
    Type
    a
  15. Skorsky, M.: How to draw a concept lattice with parallelograms (1989) 0.00
    0.002579418 = product of:
      0.005158836 = sum of:
        0.005158836 = product of:
          0.010317672 = sum of:
            0.010317672 = weight(_text_:a in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010317672 = score(doc=592,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  16. Rusch, A.; Wille, R.: Knowledge spaces and formal concept analysis (1996) 0.00
    0.002579418 = product of:
      0.005158836 = sum of:
        0.005158836 = product of:
          0.010317672 = sum of:
            0.010317672 = weight(_text_:a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010317672 = score(doc=5895,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  17. Großkopf, A.; Harras, G.: Begriffliche Erkundung semantischer Strukturen von Sprechaktverben (2000) 0.00
    0.002579418 = product of:
      0.005158836 = sum of:
        0.005158836 = product of:
          0.010317672 = sum of:
            0.010317672 = weight(_text_:a in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010317672 = score(doc=4204,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  18. Ganter, B.: Algorithmen zur formalen Begriffsanalyse (1991) 0.00
    0.0024318986 = product of:
      0.004863797 = sum of:
        0.004863797 = product of:
          0.009727594 = sum of:
            0.009727594 = weight(_text_:a in 3038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009727594 = score(doc=3038,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3038, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3038)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  19. Wille, R.: Line diagrams of hierarchical concept systems (1984) 0.00
    0.0024318986 = product of:
      0.004863797 = sum of:
        0.004863797 = product of:
          0.009727594 = sum of:
            0.009727594 = weight(_text_:a in 3040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009727594 = score(doc=3040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  20. Wille, R.: Bedeutungen von Begriffsverbänden (1987) 0.00
    0.0024318986 = product of:
      0.004863797 = sum of:
        0.004863797 = product of:
          0.009727594 = sum of:
            0.009727594 = weight(_text_:a in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009727594 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a

Years

Languages

  • e 43
  • d 34

Types

  • a 70
  • m 5
  • s 3
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…